Yuan Changwen found that there was a contradiction that he couldn't solve at all.

The idea of killing oneself and wanting to complete it is in itself pinning success on the future, and this act itself is an acknowledgment of the linear passage of time.

If time does not exist, then your own slash is nothing more than a joke. I'm looking forward to the end of the kill, and it's obvious that I'm not finishing the kill at the moment, so it means that I'm looking forward to working my own, waiting for the time to be ripe and then the kill will be completed.

This act itself acknowledges the linear passage of time and trusts one's efforts now to lead to success later. Is my slash my block? And how am I going to kill "my slash"?

It's ridiculous, while saying that time doesn't exist, but his own killing is an act that is completely based on time. Of course, you can explain that you don't care about the completion of the killing, you just want to kill and so on.

But Yuan Changwen knew very well that he was looking forward to the completion of the killing, and he was looking forward to ending this state. However, I also understand that this expectation itself is unfounded. Just like "Happy New Year", why should the New Year be happy?

It looks like it's just a New Year's greeting, but in fact it's a drag show of fear. Why can't we be sad in the New Year? As if being sad is not good, so we must have a happy New Year. Surrounded by fear, but with other loud names, that's how I was toyed with by that bewitching woman of fear.

Yuan Changwen was very uncomfortable, and once again came to a state where he wanted to cry but had no tears.

Why do you exist, or why do you become aware of these visual elements of the mind, body, and so on?

The passage of time is so natural, but I can't prove it myself. Perhaps, I will never be able to guess the real state of cultivation. All you can imagine is what the false character will be like.

Can I really do it, or am I really set up to be a slashing character?

However, if you think about it this way, you don't need to worry about anything at all, and you don't need to worry about anything. My choice is the best choice, and my idea is the best thought, because it's all a certainty.

If it is set, then everyone's behavior will be the same, and there is no such thing as a tailflow. Then, the so-called learning is just a set cutscene. It's like in the game, NPCs have to get something from the player to fulfill their long-cherished wishes.

Do you really need those things? Is it really because you learn?

Is there really anyone?

I always think of myself as human and thinking for myself. Unfortunately, this thought, like this body, is a false existence. When I think I'm real and others are fake, I'm already.

The so-called counter-current is not a counter-current at all. It just looks like a countercurrent, but in reality it's just the only state. Of course, I can distinguish between the state of the downstream and the countercurrent, for example, this is the downstream and the other is the countercurrent.

But where is the need for this distinction? There is no free will, everything is like a movie picture, so where is the necessity of this distinction between going with the current and against the current?

Because there's no such thing as going against the current!

What an idiot I am, I don't even know anything so simple now. It's right in front of me, but I can't see it, which is to describe my state. The character is too strong, and I have to admire it. Just as the sun is there, what kind of power does it take to make me think that the sun brings cold rather than warmth?

The essence of no scene is called downstream, and there is no event that can be called countercurrent, all these things are distortions in the mind.

Who is judging whether this is going with the current or against the current? On what basis? The current situation? Who knows what will happen next? Who can determine the future situation? And this kind of judgment based on the shit in the head is itself a kind of bullshit.

When I understood that things happen this way because things can only happen this way, the concept of going with the flow disappeared. I can't say anything about some of the behaviors of Yuan Changwen's character who are going against the current, there is no such statement.

Because there is no character of Yuan Changwen there at all, and there is no character who moves in space and makes all kinds of behaviors. These are all visual elements that I perceive at this moment, and I have no idea how they appeared.

It seems that the visual elements that I perceive at this moment are completely consistent with the relevant memories in my head, as if I am really going through time and changing. But actually, I can't be sure of these things at all. The only thing that is certain is that these are the elements of the picture that are perceived at this moment.

It's just that "I think" whether this is going with or against the current, or rather, going with the flow and going against the current itself is no longer a description of what is outside. For example, if I have no money, it is because I am going against the current, for example, if something happens, it is also because I am going against the current.

This description itself is, and I was thinking about how to go with the flow, and what to do to go with the flow. It's simply misleading, and very subtle, and if you don't pay attention, you can fall into the trap I had before.

If we have to describe the flow and the backflow, it may only refer to a state of mind, not a description of things. I've become accustomed to describing external things, like here, an apple is red. I will also take it for granted that it is not good to describe the event, which is countercurrent.

But the most fundamental thing is perhaps just the mentality. A mindset that goes with the flow, a mindset that goes against the current, perhaps can be described like this.

On the other hand, isn't mentality an element of the picture that we perceive at the moment? So, when I say that I can change my mentality, is there really such a thing as "change"? Isn't it predestined?

It does seem to be changing, learning by seeing certain scenes, and then suddenly realizing something. It may seem like that, but is that really how it happens?

Why so much resistance to fatalism?

That awareness is everything, and that is nothing more than that, and even this resistance to fatalism is designed. Just like watching a movie, these perceived elements of the picture can only appear in this way.

Is there anything wrong with this?

Yuan Changwen was like killing his own IQ, constantly discarding that knowledge. Although I can still remember gravity at the moment, it is not surprising if the apple really does not fall to the ground one day.

It's all perceived picture elements, and who knows what they will perceive? Those who use picture elements to infer what happens next are themselves a kind of nonsense. Even if an apple lands 10,000 times, it can't be proven that it will still land next time. ()

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: