"Aware of what", these words can shatter all cause and effect, and can also shatter things like time.

Slowly, I was dying, and the twist in my mind was shattering.

Destroy this, nothing can survive.

The distortion in my head is garbage, I knew it from the beginning, but I didn't dare to throw it away.

And some things that are useful in life have been pretending to be real, and I am willing to pretend not to see them.

For example, I wouldn't jump off a building because I believe that "gravity is just an element of the picture and an element of the picture".

Although I wanted to jump off the building very strongly, and thought that it would be okay to jump down.

My senses are not limited by my body, I should have known about this thing a long time ago, but I didn't want to see it.

I've been saying that "it's easy to present anything you want to do", but now I'm starting to understand the meaning of this sentence.

From understanding intellectually, to understanding and understanding, in the end, you still have to die.

The very existence of the character is, I am a fake in itself, and there is nothing worth surviving.

Hallucinations are no longer hallucinations, they are still the content of awareness, just the length of time and the number of people.

And what those mentally ill people see, doesn't it just mean that they are just the presentation of picture elements, and there is nothing limited by the body.

Even if scientific theories are used to explain that the brain can see things that it does not have, just like hallucinations, then how can it be proved that things that normal people see actually exist?

Die, there's no need to talk about these things anymore, every time you talk about it, it feels funny and ridiculous.

Moreover, I'm only interested in slashing, and it seems that any chat can involve slashing, and any discussion should discuss whether the world is real or not.

It's funny to think about, what a simple question, since the mentally ill person sees an illusion, since the thing the mentally ill person sees is not real, then how can I prove that the table and chair I see are not an illusion?

Stopping these questions makes me feel like I've been living like an idiot for so many years.

In other words, the picture elements present these unbelievable memories, is it used to be funny?

It's such an amazing state that I never ask if the world is real or not, and I can't imagine why I wouldn't ask.

Die, the Grim Reaper cutie seems to be smiling, satisfied with the falsehood of my see-through world.

You want to kill, you want to destroy, you want to destroy, and you want to die.

Perhaps, if I hadn't been alone, my family would have been in a mess a long time ago.

However, if this really happens, it can only mean that the elements of the picture are presented in this way, and there is a natural reason for it.

But I don't necessarily understand this reason, and I don't even believe it at all.

For example, maybe my quarrel with my family was about smashing the jar to free the cockroaches trapped in the jar.

And the reason I can find is just a distortion in my head, and the reason why "I think" these things are happening is this.

But is it really this?

Actually, I don't know, and the reasons don't matter.

It's not like I've found the reason and then I'm able to move forward with that reason and go down the river.

But after going downstream, you will see the reason.

Of course, no matter how reasonable the reason, it is not true, it is just a statement to enrich the truth of the moment.

It makes sense to make this false world seem perfect, and the causality and linear passage of time allow the characters to immerse themselves in the experience.

It's like the story of the farmer and the snake, it seems that because the farmer saved the snake and put the snake in his arms, he was bitten later.

But the reason for "the farmer saves the snake" is not real, it is just the memory of the elements of the picture at this moment, and the explanation of the reason presented is just to make the moment "the farmer was bitten" seem real.

And there is no need for the farmer to regret it, because all this is just the content of realization, and it is not the farmer who chooses to save the snake at all.

Even, this regret is only what I realized.

It seems that "the farmer saves the snake" is the farmer's choice, and the farmer himself will have a strong sense of reality, and it was because I saved the snake that I was bitten at this moment.

Unfortunately, at this moment, I can't be sure if I was the one who saved the snake before, or if the act of saving the snake really happened.

But in fact, it is only aware that the farmer chooses to save the snake, only that the farmer is bitten by the snake, and only that the farmer regrets it.

Strictly speaking, it is only at this moment that the farmer is bitten, and the previous reason is only the memory of the picture elements, and it is impossible to prove that it really happened.

Even if it was false, it could not be proven.

The characters are still struggling, and they want to say something, even if these are graphic elements, even if these are false, it has happened.

It's like the content of the movie, although it's not real, it still happens from the beginning to the end.

It's just a compromise, a reassurance to save the character.

Back to the previous question, whether the thing behind the wall is presented.

The character still wants to be alive, and he still wants to continue to hold on, which is really tenacious.

Let's die, die completely, the distortion in my brain is to keep entangled, to keep talking nonsense, and to keep mixing up and changing concepts.

That's what you realize at the moment, that's all.

It is still the belief in the existence of time that will think that the memories in the brain have happened falsely, just like the story in the dream is not real, but it has happened from the beginning to the end.

At the moment, all I can prove is the moment, so why should I believe things that I can't prove at all?

Believing that something that can't be proven is brainwashing.

It's just what you're aware of, and it's here and now.

I don't know the rest, so I should keep the attitude of not knowing.

But I had to believe it, and I said that if it can't be proved, it means that it doesn't exist.

I don't believe that the story in my memory really happened, how should this stop believing be described to be more understandable?

What I realize at the moment, I have to say that those memories have happened, what kind of hellish mentality.

Those memories are the visual elements that I perceive at this moment, and they don't exist anywhere else, and I have no reason to believe that those memories actually happened.

The character is reluctant to discard these things, and once they do, it means the character's death.

The point is that the world is not real, it is only the content of awareness, and the causal relationship between these realized contents is just presentation.

These causal relationships are not real, and the linear passage of time is not real, so what am I still discussing?

It seems that I have a hard time throwing away the linear passage of time, and it seems that I still want to continue to believe in the existence of time, but time does not exist and is not real at all.

It's just a character who still believes in the world, and it doesn't affect that awareness, and there is no way to escape that awareness anyway.

Genius one second to remember the address of this site:. Mobile version reading URL: m.