Fear is still harassing me, it's a real annoying thing.

It's just a twist in his head, what qualifications do you have to be arrogant here, and you can be presumptuous for so long?

Am I too cowardly, or am I too powerful?

There's nothing wrong with fear, it's a quick time to do something. For example, if you are afraid of not having money, you can make money well, and then everyone will do this to build a new era of empire. Another example is the fear of getting sick or the fear of something bad happening, which will push the character to do something.

As long as I weigh it through the twist in my head, then there should be fear. After all, I'm not omniscient, and if I want to achieve a certain goal through some means, I will naturally leave loopholes. Because I have no idea if those means will achieve the goal, it will naturally give fear the opportunity to make up the future.

The world is not real, what am I expecting?

The real never ceases to exist, and the unreal does not exist. In other words, truth exists, not truth does not exist.

It can be said that tables and chairs do not exist because these limitations are not real. It can also be said that all this is true and true, because there is no such thing as non-truth. Then, these tables and chairs are not tables and chairs, but the awareness, the essence of which is real.

Not to think in terms of content, but to know that none of this has anything to do with me. That mind has no control over anything at all, and all this manifestation falls within the realm of "I don't know".

There is no me in this world, or rather, this world is all me.

The overall presentation of the whole picture element creates all this, whether it is thinking or otherwise.

I became aware of the fear, I realized that I was happy, I realized that there was a table, I realized that something was happening, I was aware of my judgment of these things, was there anything wrong with that?

In the same way, is there any difference between "aware" and "aware" in the above discourse?

How do I know how the content of the realization came about, why it came into being, how it will continue, etc. I can guess, I can reason, but I can't be sure that my guess is true.

It seems logical, it looks like Apple will definitely land, but in the end it is just wishful thinking. Interpreting picture elements with picture elements and predicting content with what you are aware of is not credible.

What if all this is destroyed? What do I cherish not at all, but where is "I"? When I perceive that a mind says to cherish and realize that a certain idea is important, do I listen to these things in my head?

Is it really what I put in my head? Why is it the same as everybody else? Why does it have to be the same as everybody else? If everybody has their own opinion, what's the difference?

A million monkeys knocking on a million typewriters will always knock out a book. There are so many people in the world, if everyone has their own independent thoughts, should they be completely polarized? From extreme good to extreme evil, they should all be presented.

But it seems that everyone wants the same thing, and everyone pursues the same thing.

If my brain says to cherish it, I have to listen to what is in my head? Before listening to what is in my head, I should first ask if what is in my head is my own?

What's more, everything in my head is distorted, one-sided, and unfounded affirmations. Why should I believe this shit, and why should I let this shit run wild in my head?

Yes, fear, who knows if you will die worse? right, believe in the distortion in your mind, if you don't succeed, at least you won't fail too badly. Even if it is obscure, it can at least barely make ends meet. In this society, it is not easy to starve to death by listening to the distortion of the mind.

And to discard the distortion in the mind is not just to discard the wrong knowledge, but to throw away the whole brain. Because, everything in the mind is distorted, nothing is not one-sided, and nothing is not an unfounded affirmation.

So, what are you keeping?

My former self thought that I knew what the future would bring, and although it wasn't perfect, at least it wasn't too far off. Maybe there are some discrepancies in the achievement of goals, but at least there is no fear of planetary explosions, alien slaughter or anything like that.

Although there are many distortions in the mind, you will still know that you have to earn money, support your family, have responsibilities, be filial, and so on. To kill is to kill these self-definitions, to kill the emotion of "thinking that something must be true".

It can also be said that the persistence of the character's attributes is slashed.

How can a person not be filial? This is a strong emotion, this is something that needs to be killed. And when you start to kill, you will naturally be afraid, because after the killing, there is nothing left.

For example, killing filial piety does not mean that it is not filial. The black-and-white trap is a means for the characters to keep playing. And the distortion in the mind must be on one side of the duality, so that an unfounded affirmative sentence can be formed.

What should I do after I am killed? This is a question that Yuan Changwen often encounters, and what he should do is the right thing.

But in fact, there is no conclusive conclusion at all. If a person doesn't care about anything, then there is no need to kill anything. It is because of the existence of the character, and because I believe that I am the character of Yuan Changwen, that I will firmly grasp all the self-definitions that constitute the character.

Rebellion against fate? sounds bloody, because I always think "why". However, I seldom ask "why do I have these things in my head", "why can my self-esteem control me", "why can money and parents be arrogant in my head", and so on.

I will only ask why I am so poor, why I am at the bottom of society, why I trample on my dignity, etc.

What the character wants to do or how he emotions has nothing to do with me.

It's not like I'm manipulating all of this. In other words, all this is not the manipulation of this mind at all. Thinking is only a picture element, and the words and deeds of the character are also just picture elements.

Without me.

Yuan Changwen fell in the depths of the lake, and when he decided to commit suicide, all this was irreparable. It looks like you can go back in time with just a nod, but the part that is "willing to nod" is the part that is going to be killed.

I'm still falling, I don't know when it's over, or even if it's over. Let me see what kind of drama can be staged about the role of Yuan Changwen. Escape the costume, what the hell is that awareness?

The death of the character, but not the death of the body, what kind of state will it be. What form will the truth that is admired by the sages be presented? ()

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: