, it's all.

And the funny thing is that even though I'm denying the killing, the act itself is a killing. Denying that the killing still belongs to the killing Yuan Changwen himself was stunned.

Luckily, I don't need to sort it out. Burn it, throw it away, this shit.

It's all saying baseless affirmations.,Just to plump up the characters.,I don't care about what I'm saying at all.。

No, it's still a very low level.

It's completely the presentation of the elements of the picture, and there is no reason to speak of it, that's how it is presented.

Whether I'm happy or sad, whether I'm killing or submissive, it's all a representation of the elements of the picture. There is no me in this, only the role of Yuan Changwen.

Including the thinking at the moment, it is also the presentation of the elements of the picture. No matter what happens, I can't escape that.

It's not that I grasp the false, it's not that the emotions grasp the false, but that the grasp is directly presented. What can I do? No.

I don't know, although it seems that I did get rid of a lot of emotional pulls through slashing, I still can't be sure.

Hate falsehood, and then go crazy to kill. However, I'm not sure that slashing can cut off the emotional pull before I start slashing.

What the hell.

I'm not sure how I got to where I am, though my memory tells me very clearly that it was all because of the killing. But, am I sure?

Weirdly, that's how it all happened.

It's like exercising can increase muscle lines, which is something I've always known, but once I have muscle lines, I can't be sure if I've acquired muscle lines through exercise.

It's ridiculous, but I can't find any other explanation, can't be sure is can't be sure. In other words, it may be useful and reasonable to explain picture elements in terms of picture elements, but it is only a reassurance.

Just like I thought the apple would shatter when it landed, even though it was a picture element explaining the picture element, and even though it happened many times, I still couldn't be sure. At the same time, I still believe in it, and try not to let the apple fall to the ground.

No one can pull up and kill, said many times, the role of the theatrical performance only. It has nothing to do with the specific content of the performance, whether it is noble or crazy, it is all false.

In fact, no one can elevate the theatrical performance of any character. No matter how many people agree, no matter how reasonable, it's just nonsense. The same goes for slashing, no matter what the reason, it can't change that it's just a dramatic performance of the characters.

Yuan Changwen was a little hesitant, "Everything is the presentation of picture elements", which has also appeared before. But is this a false means to hinder the kill, or should you really discard the kill?

Why don't you dare to discard and kill?

Damn, it's fear again. Slashing becomes a character attribute, not just the character is promoting that he is slashing, as a means to show off. Also, if you are afraid that after you discard the kill, you will not be able to complete the kill.

What is the difference between this Nima and the fear that if you lose your job, you will be killed by society, and what is the difference between being ridiculed if you are afraid to stop traveling, stop acquiring knowledge?

If you can kill others, why can't you kill "the kill itself"?

Whatever I catch, I have to kill. I often say this sentence, what reason is there to let go of the killing itself? I grasp the killing, and I grasp the killing with emotion, so why let the killing be presumptuous?

The whole process won't stop, and I won't want to.

There's nothing realistic, no character slash or no slash, no one is more real than the other. It's all the same level, and it's just the presentation of the picture elements.

I've had enough of tidying up and need to go crazy now, I need to ruin it all. Reason is just an obstacle, a reassurance to want to keep it and destroy it at the same time.

I should have exploded and then destroyed myself and shattered into pieces. Then, see clearly how these pieces of things are lying on the ground, and how he makes these together into the role of Yuan Changwen.

That awareness is everything, and there is no need to discuss and delve into the elements of the picture at all.

Yuan Changwen felt a burst of darkness, as if the surrounding lake was even darker than before. Or, in fact, it has always been so dark, just the light of my own imagination. The brain seems to be completely paralyzed, and there is no way to get around that cycle.

The whole killing itself is ridiculous, and since there is no causal relationship, where does the causal relationship of the killing itself come from?

How do I kill if I don't make some kind of connection?

No need to reason, no need to think, let it all explode and then destroy it. I knew I was going to lose something, maybe more, but it didn't matter. What does the possession and loss of the character have to do with me?

Fear may arise, worry may arise, but it is not a problem. Whatever you want to appear, it's not up to me to control it anyway. Thinking always thinks that he is the best in the world, as if he can control everything.

And the funny thing is that the mind knows that it can't control it, but it always wants to control it. It's either omniscient or prejudiced. However, I don't know if I have a brain, whether I use the knowledge and knowledge in my head to think.

It may seem so, but is it really so?

Right, the direct presentation of the elements of the picture, where it is logical, where the elements of the picture explain the elements of the picture, is just a subtle misdirection. It looks logical, just to be realistic.

However, is this kind of seeming effort to appear real really necessary? Since it can be presented directly, it doesn't matter what is presented, anyway, it can directly present the beliefs of the characters.

No, these are speculations, and the world simply doesn't make sense. Right, there are so many loopholes, and the biggest one is that things like "objective things, time" are treated as real without being proven at all, and there is no doubt about it.

It's not a perfect world, and it's not a well-planned dream.

The question is, why do you show the character slashing? These vulnerabilities are not vulnerabilities at all, because the characters are just representations of screen elements. So it's not a hard task to show that the characters don't know about it, just like I used to be.

Because it is not a deception, but a direct presentation of the elements of the picture.

So, what exactly do I know?

Yuan Changwen felt that his head was about to explode, but this was not really overused, it was just because of the simple presentation. There are countless picture elements that can explain picture elements, but this one in itself is not real.

Or rather, I can't be sure at all.

What else is there to kill? Every time you kill something, you have to repeat it at once, these are all false, just affirmations spoken for the sake of killing. It seems that the affirmative sentence used to kill makes sense, but it is not fundamentally different from the target of killing.

Die, die, I don't know what I'm doing. ()

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: