When I was at my smartest, I was when I first started slashing.

At that time, I seemed to have discovered a lot of great things, and I kept trying to show them, and I was constantly trying to convince others.

The head is the Tao, all kinds of analysis, all kinds of Chinese reading, which directly makes the other party unable to open his mouth at all.

Now, I don't seem to remember the killings, or the rhetoric.

It's as if I hadn't experienced a slash at all.

If someone asks me the same question again, I don't even remember how to answer it.

Perhaps, when it comes to explanation and persuasion, I was much higher then than I am now.

It's really stupid, and my brain seems to be rusty, and I can't turn around at all.

Best, forever rusty and then stuck, I don't need a brain at all.

The reality of the whole world is collapsing, and it was only reason that knew that none of this was real.

Nowadays, the unreality of intuitive perception is becoming more and more obvious.

Of course, the feeling itself is false, and there is nothing remarkable or magical about it.

After the real wakes up, or, after the slash is completed, the character is still just a character.

It's hard for me to imagine what that state would be like, and there's no need to guess.

When I stand in that state, I naturally understand what kind of state it is.

Kill the character, destroy the character.

Destroy all this and leave nothing behind.

Burn it directly, destroy it directly, there is no hope, and there is no expectation.

If the character isn't me, then please die.

It's so unreasonable, it's so unbalanced.

Thinking twice is just, just a trick of fear.

Seeking the best solution in a limited perception is a joke in itself.

I want to stay away from the distortion in my head, whether it's my own or someone else's.

There is also falsehood, these hands are not my hands at all, just picture elements.

I just feel that there are hands shaking here, and I am aware of the world, but it doesn't mean anything.

Fear is still presumptuous, this is a normal phenomenon, what is abnormal about the presentation of picture elements?

I always like to compare theory with reality, and I believe in theory more than reality.

If something happens that is beyond the basic theory, I will not hesitate to judge it as, and the reason is simply that it does not conform to the scientific theory.

Is this Nima?

Obviously, theories are just things that are summed up to explain phenomena, but now that the phenomena have happened, I firmly hold on to the theories.

An article that proves that this scientist is wrong, that epoch-making theory is wrong, are these things right?

It's speculation, it's artificially distorted, it's just.

I'm really ashamed of myself that I haven't seen through such a simple thing.

He also boasts of being smart, cognitive upgrades, and the like, deceptive things.

It's a piece of in my head, and I'm embarrassed to force others to approve of this piece of.

The most ridiculous thing is that I know this is a piece of, but I don't dare to throw it away.

There is nothing more ridiculous than this, and the very existence of the characters does not have this absurdity.

I wondered how I had been brainwashed into believing these scientific theories.

However, I don't have any interest in explaining this to anyone, it's too much trouble.

If it was the first time to kill, I was very interested and wanted to convince people all over the world by myself.

But now, I'm stupid, and it seems like it's going to take a long time to remember how I convinced myself.

I couldn't believe in science, but I couldn't remember why I didn't.

To explain from the beginning, about the way of science, the reasons why those theories are true, and then find out the contradictions from them.

And, the other person must also be honest, otherwise I will face a wave of emotional confrontation.

See, if someone else had consulted me, it would have been easier and smoother.

If you want me to take the initiative to convince others, forget it, I don't have the slightest interest.

The behavior of the plump character, what am I trying to convince others?

It's not fun at all, and it's important to emphasize the wishful thinking that you're right.

And I don't want to argue, so I can't talk about persuasion.

If the other party is honest, then there is no need for me at all, right, an honest person can see this for himself.

I don't understand how the Buddha could have thought of leading people, or purifying sentient beings or something.

There are no sentient beings at all, Pudu is a fart!

Maybe, it's just added by later generations, who knows.

Full of compassion?

If compassion is interpreted as having to do good deeds, what does that have to do with reality?

And after the slaughter is complete, it is impossible to think that it is necessary to do good deeds.

Either compassion has another explanation, or it's.

There's nothing to say, I don't know anything about the Buddha myself, it's just hearsay.

Perhaps, the Buddha has some unique moves, but there is a round-the-clock pursuit of truth.

"This is not scientific", it is funny to think about it, what does this sentence express?

Is it trying to express that this matter violates scientific theories and is therefore false?

Or do you just want to express yourself unexpectedly?

However, the unexpected itself means believing in science, and still going back to square one.

If nothing is known, it seems that anything that happens is okay.

The presentation of picture elements does not need to violate any so-called laws at all.

It's good to present a character flying in the sky, just present it directly, do you need to fight against any gravitational force or something?

Is the law itself really a law?

Who is arranging these nouns?

It's disgusting, and the thought of believing in this shit for so many years makes me feel sick for a while.

What planets are autobiographical, what planetary masses cause space-time to collapse, leading to the presentation of gravity.

Aren't these speculations?

Why take these for real?

And, when a phenomenon contradicts these theories, it is directly judged to be false?

Some of the new theories are okay, and it seems that everyone has discussed the past, and it seems to have a very scientific spirit and atmosphere.

And for some of the old theories, it seems that after proving that there is a problem, it is a big deal.

What headlines, what rewrites textbooks and stuff.

However, some of the older theories seem to be treated as if they were true.

Could it be that a theory that has been around for a long time has directly become true?

Science, science, what kind of, such easy brainwashing.

It is estimated that it has something to do with the application of science and technology brought about by science.

But who still doesn't believe in science these days?

Funnily enough, scientific theories are not scientific at all.

In other words, when scientific theories are propagated, the scientific spirit must be concealed.

It can only be done to a certain extent, not all the time.

In life, I don't seem to care so much about the scientific spirit and theories.

These are just things used to enrich the character's attributes.

Whether it is superstition or scientific theory, only if you can plump up the character, then you can take it directly.

In fact, it's all wishful thinking. (https:)

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: