I think I'm full of sanity and I'm very organized in my work, and every step has its own cause and effect.

It's all liars.

When I chose what I remembered, I was already deceived. Although that would make life easier, falsehood is falsehood.

Even, what words and deeds the character of Yuan Changwen will have, I can't predict at all. I'm not the character of Yuan Changwen, and I can't exert the slightest influence on this role.

That's how these things happened.

"There's an apple here", sorry, that's a wrong expression, it should be "I think there's an apple here." ”

As for whether there is really an apple here, I don't know, but "I think" there is one, so there is nothing to argue about. It's all "I think", what else can you fight for?

No matter what the other party thinks, life must work hard, love is responsibility, filial piety to parents is a must, the earth is spherical, the world is real, you must not regret it in this life, you should be full of passion...... These are all things that the other side thinks, so what's there to argue about?

And most of the things I think are uncertain, and these are also things that "I think". Why convince others, and why let others convince me? The characters are all fake, just various characters acting out their lives in the elements of the picture.

Is it wrong to think that the earth is round, to think that the earth is square? Who is at fault? Where is the fault? It's just "I think," it's just a kind of "I think" to make life more convenient. Who would trouble their lives, who would think that something they didn't agree with was in their heads?

What's wrong? There's no right, what's wrong. All perceptions are just "I think", they are just things presented by the elements of the picture that I perceive at the moment, what's wrong?

"This world is not real", is it correct? It's just that I think it's not real, it's just that the character of Yuan Changwen thinks it's not real, it's just that the picture element called "thinking" that I perceive at the moment presents the thinking content of "this world is not real", that's all.

It has nothing to do with the content, but the words and deeds are the elements of the picture itself, and it has nothing to do with right or wrong. That's how it is presented, it is the picture element that I perceive at the moment, where there is anything wrong with it.

I don't agree with what other people think. I have any opinions, others simply disdain. Who's wrong? That's right, because the whole scene is just a perceived element of the picture, and there is no such thing as a mistake.

There may be a right or wrong in the content of the argument, but in terms of the whole act and the whole scene, there is no right or wrong. Maybe the character of Yuan Changwen will also point out the mistakes of others, but it's just that the picture elements are presented like this. It's like a painting of two people arguing, it seems that the content is right and wrong, but in fact it is just a picture, what is right or wrong.

What is good and what is bad? In terms of what the mind considers, there may be good and bad. For example, a broken hand is a bad thing, although it will comfort some blessings and misfortunes, but the comfort itself is to think that it is a bad thing, otherwise it would be good to celebrate directly.

There is nothing good or bad, even if the mind thinks it's good or it's bad, it's not good or bad. It's just a picture element that is perceived at the moment, and a character's mind thinks that this thing is bad, what kind of bad thing is this?

The elements of the picture are presented in this way, and there is no right or wrong, good or bad. It's not just that the distortion in the brain doesn't know whether it's good or bad, it's not just that the distortion in the brain can only judge the so-called good and bad right and wrong at this stage, but the whole scene is the presentation of the picture elements, where is there any good, bad, right or wrong?

Even if you quarrel, even if you argue about what is good or bad, right or wrong, its own behavior is an element of the picture. Several comic book characters are arguing, and several movie characters are arguing about a certain opinion, and finally come to a certain conclusion.

What's right or wrong about the whole picture?

In the past, it was thought that no one was qualified to judge, and that the distortion in the mind was only a judgment made within a certain range of knowledge and cognition, and this judgment itself was a kind of nonsense. But now it seems that whether it is or not, there is no such thing as good or bad right or wrong in its actions.

It's just a visual element that is perceived at the moment, and that's it.

There's a picture of a man who says the earth is round. Is there anything right about this?

Another painting depicts a man who says the earth is square. Is there anything wrong with this?

Yuan Changwen felt that faint weirdness permeating his heart, not very strong, but very clear. Maybe you will still get caught up in the role, but what you see is what you see, and the means to divert attention are just a delaying measure.

That awareness is everything, and all things are just visual elements that are perceived at the moment. Time will not exist, because without the support of the picture elements, time cannot exist.

The reason why I think that time exists, and I don't hesitate to think that time exists, is because these picture elements can be compared. For example, I am like this at the moment, and then I remember how young I was ten years ago, and those photos, those videos, and my diary and so on.

But these things are only the picture elements that are perceived at the moment, and if the picture elements are removed, then the contrast is no longer there. Naturally, time does not exist. The same is true of space, where the characters, the ideas, the scientific theories, all disappear.

Yuan Changwen began to gradually understand that the sentence he figured out before, "No matter what the character does, it is all false." understands more deeply that there is nothing to do with the role of Yuan Changwen, all of which is just the presentation of picture elements.

The elements of the picture that we perceive at this moment include not only others and the scenery in front of us, but also ourselves. Not only other people's words and deeds belong to the picture elements, but also their own words and deeds and their own thinking also belong to the picture elements.

I'm no more real than the table, and I won't be more real than anyone else. The characters will always subconsciously change their concepts, obviously the world is not real, and everything is unreal, but it is gradually replaced by a real me walking in this false world.

The subtext is that I'm real and others aren't. Then, again fall into the path of plump characters, such as what theories are promoted, such as looking down on others, such as self-righteous compassion and kindness.

I'm not done yet, but I thought I was done, and I was clamoring that there was nothing to kill. However, there will always be some new realizations, and there will always be discoveries of how naïve my previous self was.

How could I think I was done with the slaughter?

Yuan Changwen felt the strangeness in his heart, and he was still a little flustered and uneasy. It's good, it's all good, even the panic and uneasiness are good.