In this case, Michael Jackson was charged with a total of four major counts: *** crime, *** attempt, providing alcohol to a minor, and conspiracy.

The so-called conspiracy crime refers to Michael Jackson's conspiracy to kidnap the boy's entire family (the plaintiff's side) in order to clear his name.

For example, the BBC's documentary "Living with Michael Jackson" caused many negative controversies after it was broadcast. In order to fight back, Jackson's team invited the boy's family to participate in the filming.

The boys' family accused Michael Jackson of kidnapping and imprisoning them, so the family is full of praise for Michael Jackson in the film. and claimed that on the night the film was filmed, Michael Jackson sexually assaulted the boy.

During the court questioning, the boy's sister came forward and became a witness for the prosecution.

She said that their words in the film are all scripted, all arranged in advance, and can be seen in the final tidbits of the videotape, with the manuscript in their hands.

However, in the film in which Michael Jackson fought back, the video clip of the boy's family talking about Jackson was not selected. When prosecutors searched the videographer's home, the film was untouched.

Michael Jackson did not hesitate to kidnap the boy's family to coerce them to shoot for such an inconsequential film, but in the end he did not use this part of the material, why?

The prosecution's statement is too inconsistent!

In addition, the plaintiff's side claims that they acted according to a "script" written by Michael Jackson's German agent, Diat Wiezner, but is that the case?

Diat Wizner's English is terrible!

I can't even understand the words, let alone write the "script" in English.

……

Another scene.

Michael Jackson's lawyer pulls out an American adult magazine, "The Edge of Cheating in the Attic." This was found by the prosecution under Michael Jackson's bed.

The lawyer asked the boy, "Did Michael Jackson show you this magazine?"

Boy: "Yes!"

Lawyer: "Are you sure it's this magazine?"

Boy: "Yes!"

Well, the facts are clear.

Subsequently, the lawyer clarified to the judge and jury that the magazine was published in August 2003, and that the plaintiffs' family had last left Neverland in March 2003.

The timing is not right!

The court was in an uproar.

……

Another scene.

The boy's parents are divorced.

In the divorce proceedings, the boy's sister accused her father of sexual assault against him and was also imprisoned for wrongful imprisonment. Then, the control of her and her brother belonged to her mother.

Exactly the same accusation against Michael Jackson.

The lawyer questioned this, but the boy's sister answered it with errors.

Compared with the trial record of the divorce lawsuit, it is full of loopholes. In the end, I could only prevaricate on the grounds that "I was still young at the time" and "I don't know".

But in fact, if she was really sexually assaulted by her father, it would be a painful memory for a lifetime, and it would be impossible to forget. Especially when she cried in the courtroom, trying to win the sympathy of the jurors, the jurors turned their heads impatiently.

If this obvious inconsistency had happened to an adult, there would have been no need for the case to be heard.

You can close the case directly!

Dare to play tricky in court?

……

Another scene.

The lawyer questioned the boy: "Your family has been in Neverland for a few weeks, right?"

Boy: "Yes. ”

Lawyer: "Mr. Jackson paid for your food, right?"

Boy: "Maybe, maybe." ”

Lawyer: "Do you know that there are still people who pay for this?"

Boy: "I don't know, I'm pretty sure Michael." ”

Well, again inconsistent.

Lawyer: "You've been on a Rolls-Royce once, haven't you?"

Boy: "I just sat in a Rolls-Royce once when I was away from Neverland with my grandmother. ”

Lawyer: "Escape?"

Boy: "Yes. ”

Lawyer: "But you went back a few days later, how long after you fled?"

Boy: "In a few days." ”

Lawyer: "So you went back and had a second escape, right?"

Boy: "I think so, whatever." ”

Lawyer: "And then you went back and had a third escape, right?"

Boy: "No!"

Lawyer: "So is there a third escape?"

Boy: "I don't know. ”

It's over, and I'm completely confused.

In fact, he went in and out of Neverland three times. If even the last one is not considered an "escape", how can the first two times be considered an escape?

……

Another scene.

Lawyer: "Your family was kidnapped by Michael Jackson, so ...... Did you call the police at the hotel?"

Boy: "No. ”

Lawyer: "Did you scream for help while you went shopping?"

Boy: "No. ”

Lawyer: "Did you call the police while you were staying at your grandmother's house?"

Boy: "No. ”

Lawyer: "Did you talk to the social workers at Neverland about the kidnapping?"

Boy: "No. ”

……

Because Michael Jackson's case has too much social influence, it has caused thunderous public opinion.

Therefore, the court decided that although the case involved minors, the media would be allowed to report on the proceedings after the adjournment.

The requirement is that there can be no information about any minors.

So when the court adjourned at noon, Yahoo, MSN, AOL, Myspace and other websites flowed out a lot of records of the morning trial.

Traditional media also reported on it.

A momentary uproar!

This case is really ridiculous!

In an interview with CNN, a reporter at the trial said: "When the boy said that he was sexually assaulted by Michael Jackson, he was as calm as if he was telling someone else's story, but when he said that he was snubbed by Michael Jackson at Neverland, his face began to show excitement." ”

On CBS's midday live commentary, legal expert Andrew Cohen commented: "This alleged victim of molestation did not act like a victim in court. At the critical moment of the prosecution's case, there is no part of the boy's story that is without loopholes and accurate under question. Sometimes sullen, sometimes competitive, sometimes impudent, sometimes evasive, the boy behaved more like a hooligan than a criminal victim in court. ”

NBC's midday news commented: "The plaintiff boy complained plainly that Michael Jackson had repossessed a car that had been used by his family, and then complained that the watch that Michael Jackson gave him was not worth much. If that's gratitude, if that's gratitude, then now the case is over. ”

FOX News: "When he testified, he spoke more like he was reciting a story he had just read than retelling his own experience. In this way, he looks more like a person who has over-rehearsed and fabricated than just a person who has been instigated. ”

……

Don is having dinner with four beautiful young women in bikinis.

It's a nice feeling!

Under the beautiful food, the appetite has also improved a lot.

It seems that when you eat in the future, if it is convenient, you can arrange some bikini beauties to accompany you, which will be more comfortable.

The restaurant's television station was broadcasting a CNN feature on the Michael Jackson case.

The host of CNN even gave his own opinion very arbitrarily: "I think Michael Jackson will definitely be acquitted! I don't know if Mr. Jackson has committed a crime, but this case is a typical false accusation! It is extortion!"

Leighton Mester was wearing a green wrap-around bikini, very sexy, sitting next to Donne, she especially liked Jackson, and was pleasantly surprised to hear such a point of view: "Donn, do you think he will really be acquitted?"

Donn said seriously, "I think it will." ”

Leighton Mester was relieved, "Then it will be." Great, I knew he had been wronged. ”

Amber Heard suddenly said: "At first glance, it is the result of the influence of the movie "The Hunt". ”

"Yes, Donne, you're great!" Leighton Mester looked at Don with her chin raised, her eyes shining with adoration.

Alexandra D'Addario also pursed her lips and said: "It's really ...... that you can influence the outcome of a major case through a movie It's amazing! so much better than my stupid daddy!"

Don En smiled dumbly and shook his head, "Are you still in a cold war with your parents?"

Alexandra D'Addario let out a soft "um," I told them straight, ...... Say I met a big guy in Hollywood, and I'm sure I'll be able to make a difference. They didn't agree and kept reprimanding me. I haven't spoken to them on the phone for more than 10 days. ”

Don twitched the corners of his mouth.

You're so big-hearted!

Can't you just panic and hide it first? Do you have to tell the truth?

If only Amber Heard, Amanda Seyfried and other ordinary families could see their daughters have a chance to become a big star, even if the road is a little more complicated, they can accept it.

Not to mention Leighton Meester, her best mother can't help but use her as a cash cow.

I couldn't sleep for a few nights when I was excited.

But Alexandra D'Addario's family conditions are very good, her father is a high prosecutor, her mother is a lawyer, and she is very influential in New York.

"Don't mention my name to them. Don had some scruples and admonished.

Alexandra Daddario was slightly stunned, then smiled, "I know, they kept asking me, I didn't tell them." Hee-hee, they thought I was following a bad old man. ”

"Poof!"

"Haha!"

The girls laughed amusefully.

……

At 3:30 p.m. that day.

The trial ended.

The sensational news has finally come out.

Pop superstar Michael Jackson is acquitted!

。 m.