Of course, this seeks to make sense, and darkness seeks development. Since human beings really die, since there is a basis for what is right, and you go against what is right, you do not develop, and even affect the development within the group, and affect the development of human members, you can only coerce or even take action, because the attack on you is controlled under the degree of your harm.

And starting a war, of course, is the worst-case countermeasure, because in order to prevent the crisis of human death, the choice of the road is to learn from the experience, refer to the road of starvation, and there are historical facts to prove that of course, it is necessary to stop the loss to solve the problem and achieve the goal.

Who doesn't want peace? Seek to be strong in times of security, external aggression.

Internal comfort and decay affect the survival and development of oneself and human beings in the face of natural physical damage. The ecological environment is changing in motion, and when it cannot be recycled, the mechanical stop movement will also drive the stop of a series of parts of the instrument.

The loss of internal operations will affect the environment that supports human beings, and the natural ecology of different species is more advanced than machinery, and human beings are more advanced in the world, which is also such a planet from low to high.

With the natural laws of the world, with your actual development model, the group you lead, and what your true thoughts are, you know for yourself whether your development model can adapt to this premise of survival and development, and how to deal with the survival and development of human beings in the natural world.

Is such a system a dead end or a way to live? Whether it is dictatorship or democracy, it is normal for people to have their own independent thoughts and decisions, but whether the people are democratic, autonomous, self-reliant, self-reliant, and moving towards material and spiritual dreams and wealth, and in line with human development, I personally think that no matter what the model, as long as it meets the requirements, and the actual implementation is in place, the facts reflect democracy and unity, self-reliance, self-improvement and unity to deal with the survival and development environment and seek freedom and all-round development, but the superficial form or lack of independence and self-improvement, etcOnly by agreeing and having a basis for the objective situation, can we adapt to the objective reality of nature and the objective conditions of the objective reality of the parties and the good and bad of history based on the right and wrong to deepen decision-making and guide development, to lead and lead development, not to imagine unfounded planning and development, to make scientific decision-making and scientific implementation to scientific development, to promote the overall situation of human development in line with the world's natural value and existence of faith, or ideals, such beliefs are to promote the positive sustainable development of human beings, so it is not in line with the overall development of the human world three lines, will be adjustedIt is meaningless not to adjust and insist on making mistakes, and it is not just hundreds or thousands of people who will be degraded and destroyed by force.

It is inevitable to die, of course, choose the one with small losses to correct and seek development, after all, even if there is a war, no one will be honest and obedient.

I also know that there are many people who are not afraid of death, and even for their own well-being, they can sacrifice the people, and secondly, they are not afraid of death, so they are not afraid of war, so they insist on degenerating, and can only end the cause by force.

And consciously improve their ability, seek the survival and development of human beings, and unite more of their own people to improve the survival rate.

In this way, there is no need for large-scale wars, but in reality they are provoking wars, don't they want to develop?

Do all the groups and everyone reflect on and aspire to peace-building the good?

However, natural disasters do not wait for anyone, too slow to agree to development and disagree with development, all have to change with the situation, deter the forces that hinder development, these changes are all worse, you do not stop the loss, the casualties will be bigger and bigger, that is, the individual himself or the existence of human beings themselves, limited material spirit, can keep up with consumption and replenishment, limited wealth, share and manage resources to deal with various natural and social crises of human beings, limited number of losses.

If you lose too much, you will live a bad and inferior life, and you will even die, if you do not maintain development, if you do not advance, you will retreat, you will not be able to cope with all kinds of problems, and you will be able to deal with the problems and harm, and you will repeat the disasters of the past.

Second, some people or groups even have nothing to do with themselves, I also pay my personal understanding of the beauty to share, and strive to do a good job of seeking valuable contributions, seeking a safe environment to create dreams, but the world is united to seek long-term human development and dreams, and it is necessary to reach a unified consensus, how to fight, and to build a good How to let people know the importance of beauty in the dark and the reality of poverty, the beauty of each other's core values of solidarity and friendliness, or the importance of the beauty of action in the dark, all kinds of ways to make their own voices to build a good world？

Is it true that a good life is not easy and precious only when war is destroyed? Only when the environment is polluted can we know how dry and important a good environment is?

Some things are not about themselves, but they must promote global human solidarity and synergy with nature for common development.

This premise must be guaranteed to advance, and if we do not move forward, we will not be able to keep up with the consumption of environmental resources.

Is it important to stop the development of individual groups that hinder development, or is it important for human development? Can you cope with all kinds of human disasters?

Every year, the environment is more and more abnormally increased in disasters, doesn't this reflect that there is something wrong with human beings that has caused such a worsening of the environment?

The various groups affirm that where the life of the people is not right, because it will not happen for no reason, different species of organisms are non-biological, and only human beings and various things dream of affecting the changes of the situation on the planet, you are in line with the laws of nature, and the environment must be relatively good.

On the contrary, it is a bad insufficiency, and even worse will threaten the survival of human beings. Different species are not efficient enough to influence nature, and even if they are so powerful that they have no natural enemies, they are far less influential than humans.

For the sake of beauty, it is necessary to make the macro parties live and stabilize, but the situation is going bad, and there must be something wrong.

And only a safe environment, their own stable survival and seek to be strong, one is used to do all kinds of things and dreams in many places, create a new situation for mankind to a new height, as a real person, what specific various situations constitute the rhythm, how to take measures to solve problems to achieve goals, how to fight to exist and seek development.

Is it possible to give up the beauty of reality, to create dreams based on reality, to give up dreams and seek a better personal life, to the reality of human life is beautiful, and to grow extreme thoughts to destroy death, and more people are living and dying.

How can mankind still develop, and even if there is a war, there must be something wrong that is not conducive to the development of each other's three fronts.

。 But the other group is sure to develop everyone's good. But the reality is that more people stand up to support the construction of a better world, make a position on development, and believe that human beings can determine the development of their own world, and they can also build a better world away from meaningless wars.

From standing up to build a good and building a good, seek to be rich in materials. Optimize the spiritual life of the officer, enrich the dream, harvest the officer, to move towards more and stronger various professional things, all aspects, each thing, the specific surrounding actual situation, the surrounding parties constitute a rhythm, there are countermeasures to solve, survive and harvest more and stronger.

Rich to strong and more likely to survive, and the next step to continue to seek development and sustainable to eternity, strong you or poor you, what to do next?

Food, clothing, housing and transportation and other things do a good job of maintaining the foundation of survival and health, keep expanding, seek great things, do more things, be good at big things, go bankrupt and starve and do not die, a secure and inclusive society, maintain the momentum of struggle to build a better, do more, and do more things with age, it seems to be tossing and in line with development (hard work and effective methods are the right way, good come true and seek long-term life, until eternity is not easy) enter the new environment to contact new things, understand all parties and new objects to contact the battle and investigate how good and bad, how to adapt and overcome and find and invent things to apply the actual combat system, the problems of all parties, and everyone can not break throughTo seek change, innovation, progress, breakthroughs, solve problems, achieve goals, overcome personal problems, and aim to deal with similar problems on the premise of a community with a shared future, integrate into the entity, and develop into new things.

After all, people are limited, existing things can only solve existing problems to achieve limited results, and if you want a new height and depth, you must innovate to make a difference, and innovation can solve the problem that cannot solve the problem, so as to avoid failure, casualties, and large losses, and can improve the survival rate.

Never-ending pursuit of development. However, to deal with the problem of human life and death, the overall development of human beings is more important than the interests of individual groups, to fight war is the last resort, there is no gentle way to do it, to solve it with the lowest loss, to deal with the darkness, the internal darkness of the struggle or hinder the development of human beings Some groups and collective darkness, can do as much as possible.

Try not to do things that can be solved by talking. Force is a last resort. However, those who commit wrongful crimes and break the law are still individuals, and they have to resist and confront each other, and they have to fight and even use force to fight.

Or the means used when it is hard to hit. This group should not speak. But there is a basis for objective things, not in line with the right basis, hindering development, dealing with it in a gentle way, protesting and warning and educating or how to solve the problem from the lowest loss to achieve the goal, unable to solve the problem to increase the loss of countermeasures, the next strategy to deal with casualties, but the times are different, peace is the mainstream of the overall trend, even if the weak group dares to burn jade, the lethality is great, the harm of war is great, and the bias is offensive fighting style, belligerent, attack at every turn, you are for peace, exercise more communication sources and responsibility, say more and do more, do not do it when you disagree, punish mistakes, and more tolerate and correct mistakes to build a better life。

Other ways of playing to change. Minimize losses to solve problems and achieve goals. And my group, there are crimes and terrors between the groups, and they have to participate in it and seek to build a better at the same time, and they have to intervene in various things to take on the inter-group development of human beings, and they need to fight the battle, and the education of the education, so that they can learn from each other, create a new human race, and form a reality that is different and unique, but it is also more common or can be used to seek survival and development, close the gap and difference, and each other can cope with the darkness without a lower limit and the beautiful construction without an upper limit, forming a new human race, so that individual people, the difference is not big.

Some are spiritual and thoughtful without too many differences and more consensus, and some are just different personalities from person to person, each freely choosing to assemble their own style of play.

。 Therefore, we must fundamentally find the model of the united front to seek to develop mankind, even if there is a meaningful dark war, it should not appear casually, no one has the right to deprive others of their lives without basis, even if there is a basis, they have no right to deprive lives, there are rules of inter-regimental law, what mistakes need large-scale war damage?

Sin is not unto death. But the premise is that everyone stands up and speaks out? Seek moral solidarity and improve the ability to deal with human consumption and natural social problems.

In such a war, should we not stand up and make clear our stance on building a better country, otherwise it will hinder development?

Maintaining unity and seeking to be strong, the harsh natural environment does not wait for anyone, the frontier situation, all kinds of crises do not unite more of their own people all the positive forces that can be mobilized, and the fragile scattered sand in the face of nature in the community of destiny is easy to disintegrate.

How much darkness will it take to stand up and ignore the global and different groups to develop morality and casualties, will it be lost in cold-blooded, natural destruction, moral slippage and destruction, and death from the collapse of nature, or will it directly force humanity to unite and value the protection of nature?

Doing change, not uniting and strengthening, co-production and creation to cope with human beings to cope with the consumption of natural society, existing things can not keep up with innovation and outstanding problems, will hurt more, so there are things that force human beings to build a good thing, all in order to seek development.

There are more forces to address frontier natural, environmental, social, and ethical issues. That's the kind of group. Officers exist.

The officer has ideals. The area lives, what food is around, want to eat better. Food ideal dreams and having food to eat.

Stabilize material life. Everywhere the environment and the ideas and culture shape the quality. and high and low levels, forming a pattern composed of the current situation and the relationship between them, and the reason why different groups are different is that they are tempered.

Able to tolerate tolerance. Competent. But are different groups not human beings from each other, not normal people with the same kind of shared future, or are they similar?

How many distinctions? Not much. I'm in this group. The director has to adapt to the reality of reality, have ideals, and do things that are beneficial to dreams.

These similar thoughts, thoughts, and daily habits are all differences that have been formed over time.

But how much difference is there as a human being? It's just that your style of doing things and playing is too little touch. It's different.

A community with a shared future. Everyone is well-rounded and can have a person who is fully capable of black and white problems. Respond to all levels of living problems with the goal of solving all aspects.

It's just that your daily pattern, the contact is too small, the field of vision is too small, the change is too slow to form a relatively static impression, there is no room for growth when you are old, in fact, it is not, it is not the movement, but the experience is less, and the change is small.

At worst, fight wars for development. Fight for mistakes, solve with minimal losses. In order to benefit each other's development, there is no need to be polite except for not developing and not developing.