People say I'm on the wrong foot......

Something like this.

wrote that Cao Fangfang's development direction will be mainly adapted from online texts.

Then I think readers want to see familiar and immersive online articles.

Make these online texts into film and television dramas, and not in the way of copying, the protagonist is only responsible for adaptation, which is both reasonable and respectful of other authors.

In other words, some authors of reality, like Jin Yong in me, exist in the form of projections of another world.

But many readers said that they had to get permission, and the other authors agreed.

Then I realized that these great god authors are very difficult to find...... Basically, QQ won't reply.

I'll hold the editor accountable, and the editor in charge will say you write it, and people won't care.

Then I struggled and asked him to help me get in touch.

He asked me rhetorically, did you contact the other works or celebrities that appear in your book?

This......

Then I started to do logic.

The logic goes like this.

Many authors choose to copy directly, and carry the popular works in reality into themselves, and the reader doesn't feel anything, it seems to be taken for granted, and I don't feel anything, so I wrote this one.

But I vaguely feel that the copy is not very good, and it is not reasonable.

Isn't it more respectful to carry the author and the work together, half-overhead?

But in fact, it is the same, in principle, it is not possible.

If I write about Dou Po Heaven's adaptation of a TV series, Zhu Xian's adaptation of a TV series, or a moving movie, readers often don't have doubts, because everyone writes like this.

But writing other online works, no.

People think you're infringing on copyright.

It's weird......

In fact, these copyrights are all at the starting point......

I delved into the logic and realized that in fact, I wrote about the Condor and the Pretender, but in principle, I couldn't.

Modern poems and songs are not good.

Entertainment, unlimited streaming, and so on...... In principle, none of them work, they should not exist.

This logic goes down...... I don't even know if I should write it down or not. ==

Write, scold, original, scolded.

There's no system, I can't write a small script from a subjective point of view, the main character doesn't travel into that world, and the dry writing will be boring.

I don't think it's logical to carry other readers' insensitive works.

Why do I want to respect the authors of online texts and let them appear in the work as a whole, even in the world, the work is still theirs, this is not okay.

But I copied other more famous works, but this one?

Why is it okay for other people to copy the whole world......

I'm awkward and can't get by.

The root of the problem becomes, in principle, entertainment should not exist...... But I've already written it.