Truth vs. Falsehood.

This is a recent meme.,There are a lot of pictures.,It's going to give a lot of truth and falsehood.。

Many of them are reversed.

It was supposed to be that person, but it turned out to be false.

It's just for fun.

The proud work of sand sculpture netizens is quite successful on the Internet and has spread widely.

It's a joke.

And now, how much of a joke is there in Luo Yunfei's article?

"The real anti-war should be to smile when facing children, and even if children pick up lethal weapons, they must hesitate and never shoot them.

However, in the face of the parents and relatives of this little child, as long as they are threatened, as long as they dare to resist, then they will be killed!

Because they're not right!

They're just not right!

……

What about false anti-war?

False anti-war means that there must be no mercy for children.

This kid is a threat to us, so we have to fight!

It's a battlefield!

It's not right that this kid has appeared, what's wrong with Lao Tzu shooting?

It's good to spare him a life!

As for the parents and relatives, I don't know where.

But we know that if we don't fight back, then our parents and relatives will die!

That's right, they're not right!

Or are they wrong.

Why invade the territory of our country?

This is, of course, a false anti-war movement.

……”

This article is quite interesting, and it's the same as those memes on the Internet.

But as soon as this article came out, it was immediately reprinted.

"I didn't understand it at first, but then I realized that yes, it was the Vietnamese who invaded us first!"

"That's right, that's right, now that I look at it, a lot of public opinion has been controlled, and we have been affected by some enemies!"

"Does this have anything to do with Wu Qiang's plagiarism? Yes, but I think Wu Qiang is not plagiarism at all, Wu Qiang is slapping his face!"

"Which is true and which is false, this is indeed a very special question, I think Wu Qiang is trying to express something. ”

"It's interesting, Wu Qiang's technique is still very interesting, using this movie, he must want to say something!"

"So, can this be plagiarized?"

"Why do I think this plagiarism is not plagiarism at all? This shot is not far from the shot in that Hollywood movie, the composition is not the same, and it also has the flavor of the 80s, plus the final result, can this be considered plagiarism?"

Is it whitewashed?

It should be said that it is not washed, but it is totaled by everyone, and I figured it out.

Of course, the role of an article is not very large, Luo Yunfei helped Wu Qiang speak, completely from the perspective of the heart, which is a manifestation of conscience.

And more, there are still a lot of followers, as well as those KOL articles that Boss Wang left.

After all, Wu Qiang is stereotyped on the Internet.

Not to mention Wu Jing.

"Wolf Warrior! This is Wolf Warrior, this time it's a plagiarism Wolf Warrior!"

"Don't talk about anything that isn't plagiarism, this is plagiarism, do you want to have a little face?"

"Where's Little Pink? What about those little players?

"Wu Jing planted it this time, the anti-Vietnam war wolf is finished, haha......"

It's like a carnival.

A large number of people who don't know what's going on are squirting all kinds of abuse on the Internet.

can link this movie to Wolf Warrior, which is also a bit powerful.

It's just that, in such a situation.

Public opinion on the Internet is all kinds of nonsense and plagiarism.

Also, Boss Wang and other bigwigs have launched many domestic blockbusters, such as opponents like "Fierce Insects Across the River".

Plus there is also the strong pressure of the Hollywood blockbuster "Jurassic World 2".

How did "Blitz" perform at the box office?

After the release, there was only 32% of the film schedule, this film schedule is definitely a very decent film schedule, and even to say that Wu Qiang did not use his identity, nor did he use Wu Jing's cast power, nor even did he use Uncle Daoming's old face, let alone the fame of Sister Yaya Datian Tian and Tianxian.

That's what a film is arranged.

directly killed 300 million box office on the first day!

The next day, the film schedule was raised, rising to 40%, breaking through the box office of 400 million!

Awesome!

This box office is very awesome!

As long as you understand the domestic box office, you will understand that this level is already very strong.

And what about the other movies?

"Fierce Insects Across the River" only had a first-day box office of more than 40 million.

Of course, the film schedule of this movie is not too high.

As for "Jurassic World 2"...

On the first day, it also performed very well, and also won 300 million box office.

But the next day, there was a weakness.

Only 200 million!

This one......

200 million, it must not be said to be less, but the single-day box office results of 200 million on the second day are definitely not in line with a super blockbuster like "Jurassic World 2".

And, not only that, but the film's reputation has also seen a huge decline.

Originally, the initial score on Douban exceeded 8.5, but only two days later, it dropped to 7.5.

Directly dropped one point.

Why?!

Why?

"The film "Jurassic World 2" is now going to the mentally retarded. ”

"That dinosaur blew so badly, wasn't it bitten to death by a little dinosaur in the end?"

"Is Star-Lord always so two-cornered? Although I like him very much, it seems that he has been stereotyped, and he plays a two-cornered role. ”

"Don't mention Star-Lord, okay? Under the IP of "Jurassic", Star-Lord performed well, much better than in Marvel. ”

"Star-Lord, come with me!"

"That's right! Star-Lord is a fool! Don't scold and be unwilling!"

What's going on?

Collapse, collapse.

Properly collapsed.

One of the most interesting is Chris Pratt, who has been very successful in his career in recent years, which is much better than the kind of MLM advertising on TV that used to be.

However, wasn't there a "Avengers III" before?

That's right, this movie is indeed a hit, the box office is really good, all kinds of discussions are uproaring, although the lack of stamina makes people see the flaws of fan movies, but, overall, "Avengers III" is definitely a successful movie.

But what about Star-Lord?

Star-Lord's performance in "Avengers III" is like a retarded!

Or it can be said that Star-Lord's performance in it was completely manipulated by the director and screenwriter, just so that Thanos could snap his fingers, and he Star-Lord was so mentally retarded.

It's just a pig teammate.

Moreover, this incident makes this movie series of the Marvel Universe completely confirm the attributes of fan movies.

Why?

Movie fans, both domestic and foreign, are under Pratt's social account and scolding in various ways.

Vulgar, no lower limit, and even various ...... Anyway, it's so ugly.

What's going on?

Isn't this the case only for fan movies?

It's just that there are more fans this time.

What happened to Pratt?

The fat man didn't hold it up, so he apologized.

And now!

"Jurassic World" is also played by him!

He is a male pig's foot, and the first part of the year was because he collected more than $1.6 billion at the global box office.

That time, it was inevitable.

Many people, especially fans who have watched "Avengers III" before, even if they are not fans, they will be black together.

Can this dead fat man not apologize?

To tell the truth, in terms of performance, he acted according to the plot arrangement.

Moreover, Star-Lord is originally a comic attribute, and that's it.

But, it doesn't matter.

What is this like?

Now, it has affected this "Jurassic World 2".

No way, in this movie, Star-Lord still has some ...... Oh no, it's the role of Pratt, and it's still a bit of a mistake.

In particular, some of the arrangements, as well as the plot issues, a lot of things...... For example, the volcanic eruption, you see, the protagonist is just no problem, how can he not die.

Just run away, and you can hide.

There are really a lot of such bugs.

Originally, the first part of this series of movies, many plots were criticized, but this time the second part still hasn't changed, plus the problem of Star-Lord, so the box office of this movie is ...... Some can't get up.

The first two days are the first week.

In the second week of the next week, "Blitzkrieg" directly exceeded 800 million!

And "Jurassic World 2" only has a box office of 600 million.

It doesn't seem to be a big difference, but a discerning person can already see it.

With such a result, the two movies can almost be separated.

The future box office trend can already be booked, and "Blitzkrieg" will be able to take off directly by adding a film schedule to the weekend.

This situation naturally makes many people very unhappy.

……

"Why is this happening again? Holy!"

Faced with this situation, Boss Wang directly burst into foul language.

I can't help it, I can't help it.

Wu Qiang: Isn't that plagiarism?

Naked plagiarism!

Why is plagiarism all like this?

Did we scold?

Scolded!

Did anyone scold on the Internet?

also scolded!

But why is the box office still so high?!

Boss Wang can be said to be puzzled.

Looks like you're going crazy.

As for Chen Hui, Wang Haifeng and others, in fact, they saw some things.

Someone said it on the Internet.

Even if it is plagiarized by Wu Qiang, then we are willing to pay!

Yes, there are such extreme fans.

But in fact, there are other people who say it very clearly.

At present, these films, Xiao Shen's one, that is, "Fierce Insects Crossing the River" from our side, this movie is too embarrassing.

Laughing is not funny.

That Jurassic 2 was disappointing.

In other words, which film can make people feel the urge to watch it now?

There's only Blitzkrieg!

That's it, of course the box office is high.

As for the rest......

"Brother Wang, someone has given Wu Qiang a platform. ”

"Yes, that villain movie review is here, and he gave it a high score!"

"This must be Wu Qiang's trumpet! He must have bought this villain!"

What's going on?

High scores in villain movie reviews?

7.7！

Boss Wang was shocked when he saw this, why is it so tall?

The villain movie critic wants to give a low score.

What's going on?

It's written very clearly.

"It's all said to be plagiarism, but it's not, maybe the situation is the same, maybe the scene is not different, but the result is the biggest difference, in fact, this plot arrangement is like this, the most important thing is the result.

It was the child who laid down his weapon himself and chose not to shoot.

Or take the initiative to stop the kid from killing?

This is the root of this plot, it should be said that even if everything is figured out before, as long as there is a difference in this final ending, it is a world of difference.

I believe that many people can understand this truth.

……

And Wu Qiang's arrangement of this movie coincides with the sweater battle (it is safer to use this homonym), what does he want to say through this movie during this period?

Or rather, what does he want to pass through this place of so-called plagiarism?

We think that what he wants to say should be: we copy each other's line, we learn a lot from the United States, but we are different from them!

……”

This article is really illustrative...

PS: After the two chapters, I'll take a break from the black car, thank you all.