This girl is not a fuel-efficient lamp!

Jiang Shuiyuan knew that his morale could not be discharged, and at the critical moment, his main general must harden up, rush forward, and return the color ruthlessly, so that the other party knows that Ma Wangye is three eyes, so as to gather people's hearts and save the decline. So after hearing the host's prompt, he didn't read from the book with the card he had written before like the thin-lipped opponent, but played freely with his empty hands:

"Good morning, the moderator, the judges, the opponent's debaters, our view is that 'knowing etiquette' has nothing to do with 'canglio'. Carefully deducing the 'cangli is real and knows the etiquette', we can draw two conclusions, one is that the cangli is not true, the people can not know the etiquette and observance, and the other is that the cangli is full and then the people can know the etiquette and observance. In fact, the opponent's argument is exactly what he did in his argument, and repeatedly cited Mencius as the basis of his argument that 'the people are the way, those who have constant production have perseverance, and those who do not have permanent production have perseverance' as the basis of their argument. Is this really what is written in the book "Mencius"? Or is the meaning expressed by the opponent's defense friend the original meaning of Meng Ke's writings?

First of all, the 'people' in Meng Ke's book refers to the peasants who make a living from farming, which is why he often mentions 'a five-acre house, a mulberry tree, a chicken, a guinea and a dog, and an animal that does not lose time, and a land of 100 acres, do not take away the time.'" However, the opponent's defense friend secretly changed the pillars, equating the 'people' in Meng Ke's book with today's people, and deliberately excluded scholars, industrialists, merchants, and even ministers and nobles from the scope of the people. Because she knew that there was also a sentence in the book "Mencius" that "those who have perseverance without permanent property are only able to do so", which can directly shake the foundation of her arguments.

- Is it great to quote Mencius? I will too, and more smoothly than you!

Immediately afterwards, Jiang Shuiyuan said: "In addition, according to the record of "Mencius", Meng Ke said such a sentence when he talked with Zou Mugong: 'In the fierce year of hunger, the people of the king are old and weak and turn to the ravine, and the strong are scattered in all directions, and there are thousands of people; Note that he mentioned Zou Guo's 'Cang Li' and 'Fu Treasury', but Zou Mugong and his courtiers deceived and brutalized the people, and were indifferent to the people's livelihood and suffering, can this be regarded as 'knowing etiquette'?

Some people may think that Zou Mugong and his courtiers are just individual cases and cannot represent the majority of people. However, please don't forget that 'the virtue of a gentleman, the virtue of a villain, and the wind on the grass will die', so Confucius said in the Analects: 'His body is upright, and he does not obey orders, and his body is not right, although he does not obey orders.' If even the king and his courtiers are not able to observe propriety after the barns are full, how can the common people be expected to do so? ”

- I dare to quote not only Mencius, but also the Analects!

Jiang Shuiyuan raised a third finger: "When the opponent's defense friend invoked 'looking up to his parents, condescending to his wife, happy for life, and free from death in a fierce year' as a specific expression of 'Cang Lishi', he deliberately ignored a very crucial sentence at the end, 'and then drive away the good'. Note that Meng Ke uses the word 'drive' here, indicating that the people were forced to learn rituals, not spontaneously and voluntarily, and that 'knowing rituals' was only the result of the king's forced indoctrination, not the result of 'Cang Liao Shi'. At most, the 'cangliao is solid', so that the monarch has no worries about the future, and can rest assured that he can boldly carry out education.

"History also proves that Cang Lishi may not know etiquette. For example, during the time of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, 'the country has nothing to do, unless it encounters floods and droughts, and the people give enough to their families, and the government treasury is full of goods. The money of the Beijing division is huge, and it is rotten and cannot be studied. Taicang's Su Chen Chen Xiang is full of dew and accumulates outside, so that it is corrupt and inedible', but according to the "Historical Records and Pingzhun Book", 'At this time, the net is sparse and the people are rich, and the service wealth is arrogant, or even the gangsters who merge the Hao Party, so as to arbitrarily make decisions in the countryside. The clan has the following ministers and doctors, striving for luxury, and the chamber is subordinate to the top, and there is no 'indefinite', and there is no atmosphere of etiquette and observance and harmony throughout the country. May I ask the other side, how can this be explained?"

- I dare to quote not only the Analects, but also the Records of the Historians!

Of course, the original text of the "Historical Records" is also mixed with a sentence that is unfavorable to oneself, but it was deliberately ignored by Jiang Shuiyuan. I believe that as long as you don't deliberately flip through the book to find it, everyone present will not think that there is such a sentence in the "Historical Records". Jiang Shuiyuan relied on his ability to never forget, and made it clear that he bullied the other party to master historical materials and classics, and he was not as proficient as himself:

Even if you find out later, what can you do?

Jiang Shuiyuan's tone immediately changed: "The above three points are enough to prove that the opponent's understanding of Mencius is distorted, one-sided, and taken out of context! And the conclusion based on the erroneous understanding of the classics is naturally a tree without roots, water without a source, and nonsense, and it is not worth arguing. On the contrary, the evidence that proves that 'knowing etiquette' has nothing to do with 'Cang Li's truth' is full of sweat in the history books, and it abounds!

"For example, Guan Zhong, who first put forward the theory of 'Cang Liao actually knows etiquette', 'is rich in the office', but uses the three returns and anti-kun that only kings can enjoy, which was ridiculed as rude by Confucius; For example, Ji Zha, as a prince, is the most promising to inherit the throne, but he can push the throne and give up the country, hang up the sword and believe in it, while Lou Arat, in "Fifteen Guan", is hungry and cold, and finally robs and kills, harming goodness. Doesn't all this mean that 'knowing etiquette' has nothing to do with 'canglio'?"

The judges didn't have much impression of Jiang Shuiyuan before, after all, as a group of big men, when they first met with the debaters, they thought more about the complex relationship between the appearance and temperament of the female debaters and the flexibility of the score, and they had no time to be distracted to explore other issues. But the moment Jiang Shuiyuan stood up, they found that their eyes suddenly lit up, and then let out a long sigh: It's a pity that she looks like this, it's a pity!

The judges sat slightly upright. In an ordinary selection competition, it should be very interesting to meet a girl who knows "Mencius" well, and a boy who looks like a beautiful person!

Who knew that Jiang Shuiyuan's next move made their eyes shine again: this handsome debater like a woman actually chose to take off the script!

As we all know, debate tournaments are actually language wars. In order to be clear and not let the opponent grasp the handle, in order to cite accurately and not let the referee find loopholes, debaters usually write down what they want to say and quote on the card in advance, and just read it directly when they speak on the spot. This is especially true for competitions such as the difficulty of Chinese studies that require frequent quotations from classics. And the rules of the game also acquiesce to this kind of behavior. Who knows that this debater actually chose to take off the script, is this so confident that he is bursting, or is he planning to break the jar?

After listening to Jiang Shuiyuan's speech, the judges' eyes were completely blinded: Nima, I originally thought that the girl who was familiar with "Mencius" was already very demonic, but I didn't think that there would be even more fierce, and she was very easy to understand the chapters and sentences in "Mencius" and the "Analects"! Well, there are many people in this world who can memorize the "Analects", which is not surprising, but what is the matter with reciting the "Historical Records" in large paragraphs? Could it be that the children nowadays are so rebellious?

One of the judges couldn't help but sigh: "I said that Huai'an Mansion can send a high school child to be the main general, the ** family has long known that this child is talented and knowledgeable, and he is familiar with the scriptures and history, so he is unconventional and innovative! The funny thing is that some of us thought he was a soft persimmon, but I didn't expect it to be a copper pea that can't be steamed, cooked, flattened, fried, and chewed in the mouth and can break out teeth, right?"

Chu Hanyi, who has always been above the top, also had to bow his head and admit his mistake at this time: "This time I really looked away!"

Zhou Zhiwat said with a smile: "Don't say it's you, even the old man, I heard that a 14-year-old child will be the master, and he muttered in his heart." But then again, Huai'an Mansion really can't be underestimated, although they have been mediocre in the selection competition for Chinese studies over the years, but after all, it is the first school in Huai'an Mansion, and it recruits the most top-notch students in the province every year, who knows what kind of genius there will be?"

With the wonderful remarks of the two main generals in front, the following mutual attacks and arguments and summary of attacks and defenses are a little dull. It wasn't until she entered the free debate that the thin-lipped girl got the opportunity to ask a question and argue, and immediately fired up:

"Just now, the opponent's defense friend claimed that when I invoked 'look up to my parents, look down on my wife, live a happy life, and avoid death', I deliberately ignored the very crucial 'and then drive away the good'. Then I would like to ask the opponent's defense friend, in the phrase 'then drive the good' there is also a sentence 'the old people are also light', why don't you say it? Because the word 'light' in this fully reflects that 'Cang Liao Shi' can effectively promote the realization of 'knowing etiquette', not if the other party's 'Cang Liao Shi' has nothing to do with 'knowing etiquette'. I wonder if the opponent's defense friend thinks so?"

Jiang Shuiyuan replied without moving: "I don't think so!" First of all, although I didn't directly say the phrase 'the old people are also light,' but I have roughly expressed the meaning of this sentence, that is, 'Cang Liao Shi' can make the monarch have no worries about the future and rest assured that he can boldly carry out education, which is also the realization of the other party's defense friend to promote the promotion of 'knowledge of etiquette'. But whether it is an effective promotion, we have a different opinion!

"The so-called 'full of warmth and abundance', people will have more ideas and pursuits after abundant food and clothing, wanting to know that etiquette and observance are only one of them, and I am afraid that there are many of them that are contrary to etiquette, such as eating, drinking, and having fun, stopping wives and remarrying, gambling and cockfighting, doing evil, annexing land, and so on. Xu Jingzong of the Tang Dynasty said: 'Tian Sheweng has accumulated ten wheat, and he still wants to replace the old woman. It also proves that 'Cang Liao Shi' has nothing to do with 'knowing etiquette'!"

Answering my question about the thin-lipped girl, Jiang Shuiyuan did not take advantage of the victory to pursue, but gave the opportunity to ask and refute the question to Chen Di and Fu Shouzhang. He knows that the free debate session is more about teamwork and mutual cooperation, and it is useless to be good alone. In some competitions, individual people will firmly control their own voice, and all questions and answers will be handled by one person, and the others will not even speak from beginning to end, resulting in a poor impression on the judges and the audience, and often in the end, that person is often given the best debater, but the overall score is very low.

This is also a lesson that he learned from carefully watching the video of the competition after writing the book.

Obviously, the thin-lipped girl didn't realize this, and after answering Chen Di's question, she pointed to the water source again: "The works of the great poet Du Fu of the Tang Dynasty are called 'History of Poetry', and he wrote in his famous poem "Memories of the Past", 'Recalling the heyday of the Kaiyuan Dynasty, Xiaoyi still hides thousands of rooms. The rice is fat and the corn is white, and the public and private warehouses are abundant. There are no jackals on the roads of Kyushu, and the sun rises far away. Qi Su Lu is in the car class, and the male ploughing and the female mulberry are not lost. The saint in the palace plays the cloud gate, and all friends in the world are glue painted. There has been no catastrophe for more than 100 years, and the uncle and grandson are happy and happy. It vividly describes the process of 'knowing etiquette' from 'Cang Li' to 'knowing etiquette' in the prosperous era of the Tang Dynasty and Yuan Dynasty. May I ask the opponent's defense friend, can't such realistic and expressive poems still explain the causal relationship between 'Cang Liao Shi' and 'Knowing Etiquette'?"

Dealing with this sharp-tongued opponent, Chen Di and Fu Shouzhang were a little difficult, so they could only continue to go out from Jiang Shuiyuan: "I think the opponent's defense friend made four strict mistakes in the process of asking questions, the first is to take things out of context. Since you have recited a few lines from the second poem of "Memories of the Past", why don't you read it together with the phrase "The dog Rong came straight to sit on the royal bed, and the hundred officials stomped their feet with the king of heaven" in the first poem and "The palace of Luoyang burned down, and the temple newly removed the fox and rabbit' in the second poem"?

"The second is the rubber pillar drum. Although Du Fu's poems are known as 'poetry history', not every sentence is realistic, and every sentence can be found in the history books, otherwise we can suspect that he really only lived less than sixty years old according to his '100 years of illness and solo stage', and we can also calculate how many buckets of wine Li Bai drank and wrote a few poems in his life according to his '100 poems of Li Bai'.

"The third is hearsay. Is the prosperity of the Kaiyuan Dynasty necessarily full of warehouses? The answer is no. According to the records of the Old Tang Book, there were many floods, droughts and locust plagues in the 29th year of the Kaiyuan Dynasty, and the people were hungry and displaced, such as in the first month of the spring of the second year of the Kaiyuan Dynasty, 'Guanzhong had no rain since the autumn of the last year, and there were many people hungry'; for example, in the autumn of the 15th year of the Kaiyuan Dynasty, 'water in 63 prefectures, frost and drought in 17 prefectures, and hunger in Hebei'; and for example, in the 21st year of Kaiyuan, 'the rain in Guanzhong harmed the crops and the Beijing teachers were hungry'. If, as the opponent's defense friend said, there is a causal relationship between 'Cang Lishi' and 'knowing etiquette', wouldn't it be that the people in the Kaiyuan period should not have understood etiquette?

"The fourth is to cover your ears and steal the bell. Since the opponent's defense friend mentioned Du Fu, "Memories of the Past", and the prosperous era of the Kaiyuan Dynasty, he should definitely know that the Anshi Rebellion broke out more than ten years later, and An Lushan, the initiator of the Anshi Rebellion, learned and grew up in the Kaiyuan Dynasty and entered the official career. If Cang Lishi knew etiquette, as An Lushan, who was born in the spring breeze and grew up under the red flag, and successively served as the envoy of the Pinglu Festival and the Fan Yang Festival, it is impossible not to be Cang Lishi, and it is impossible not to know the etiquette, why does he still raise the flag and rebel?

"Based on the above four points, we can clearly see the absurdity of the other party's argument, and it also proves more and more that there is no direct relationship between 'Cang Lishi' and 'Knowing Etiquette'!"

Chen Di, Fu Shouzhang and others, who had already seen how unnatural Jiang Shuiyuan's memory was, were completely accustomed to him casually reciting Du poems and "Old Tang Book", and it was not surprising that they were not surprised. But when have the judges and the opposing debaters ever seen such a crazy and cool demon that hangs the sky? Hearing him talk about the disaster in the Kaiyuan period with his fingers crossed, he instantly felt that the whole person was not good!