As for the solution that everyone talks about water and dragging, be sure to come in and take a look

Speaking of which, this is the third time I've opened a single chapter.,In the future, I'll still put these notification chapters into the work.,It's best for everyone to take a look.,Because it's generally okay, I'm too lazy to open a single chapter.。

Well, to get down to business.

Today's opening chapter will solve one thing -- about the problem that everyone has reported about saying that I am water or grinding.

I don't recognize the words about water, but if the plot drags on...... Speaking of which, even I feel that way......

cough,But,There's a problem in this that I don't know if you've noticed.,That is, to say it hard.,Everyone actually can't tell where my plot is dragging on.,After all, the story of "The Sky and the Moon on the Other Side" is an inherent plot, not an extraneous branch, and everyone understands in the process of telling it, I'm already trying to speed up as much as possible, and every description is a necessary process, and there is no insertion or water at all.

So, where does this feeling of dragging the plot come from, I thought about it, or it boils down to two points.

The first is, of course, that everyone is not interested in this plot, and it is annoying if you are too lazy to watch it.

Second, and most importantly, the point. That's ...... I have too few chapters, or rather, I'm stuck too many words.

Speaking of which, you may not understand it very well, but I simply said that the previous updates of this book did not reflect any water problems, and now it has appeared, am I becoming more abrasive?

Not really.

I just changed the way I took it out of context.

In the past, when I wrote a chapter, I wrote it according to the paragraphs of the plot, that is, this chapter I thought I should write to which plot was out of context, and I wrote it again and again, and the result was that I couldn't control the number of words in each chapter.

But now, the situation is different, because I changed the way I was out of context before, and I started to read the word count out of chapters, two thousand words a chapter.

The difference between these two methods is very big, to briefly explain, the previous chapter is the content of the chapter that I really want to give you as an author, the reading experience that I arranged for you, and the rhythm that I arranged for you as the author, with transitions, climaxes, and tensions, so as to bring you into the plot I want to present to you.

It can be seen that the number of words is not the same.,It's like a forced division by the system.,It's very rigid to split the original chapter into pieces.,The sense of compactness that should have been the same chapter is gone.,And even if it's the content of the same chapter.,But the way to write according to one chapter and write according to three chapters is of course different.,This is offset.。

For example, I originally had to finish a content in 5,000 words, but I split it into three chapters, and it became 6,000 words, so where did the extra 1,000 words come from?

As a result, the impression that everyone thinks the plot is dragging has been formed.

About this point of breaking the chapter by the number of words, in fact, I'm really sorry, but in fact, I'm quite helpless, maybe you don't believe it, if you write a chapter according to the previous way of writing it takes enough time to write three chapters now.

This is not to say the same amount of words, I used to write a chapter of 4,000 words and often wrote three or four hours, which is quite fast, but now with the same number of words, I only need two hours for two chapters and 2,000 words.

I can't say why, but for me, it takes less time to write systematically out of context than it does to write on my own, so I've used this method before.

But!

Now that I see everyone's more consistent reaction, I just thought about it and felt that I still have to work hard to write well.

So I would like to mention the solution to this problem here.

Originally, the system of quantitative two changes was abolished not long after it was proposed, and I decided to believe in the reins and resume the previous way of writing, in this case, it may be that I can't guarantee a few changes every day, because I can't guarantee how many words a chapter has, maybe 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, 5,000, but in any case, I promise that the number of words updated every day will not be less than the 4,000 words that are now updated every day.

Is this a solution acceptable?

Let's ask for everyone's opinions today, and if everyone agrees, then start to follow this plan.

Well, above. (To be continued.) )