When the fifth episode of "The Truth" of Shaohu TV was broadcast, the ratings reached 1.26 because of Wang Qian's reputation, which is not too high in the programs produced by Wang Qian, and it is on par with ordinary variety shows.

However, after the broadcast, the wide spread on the Internet made the online click rate of this issue of "The Truth" soar unusually high, reaching tens of millions of clicks in just one day.

"It has the feel of a foreign horror movie. ”

"It's really good overall. ”

"It's a big commercial, but it's made with a lot of care. ”

"The backstory of a game is more than two hours long, and it doesn't look like the game is going to be bad. ”

"I'm looking forward to the game "Silent Village" and I'm ready to play it with the original version. ”

"I hope the game doesn't disappoint me, I want a nightmare experience like that of a cute girl. ”

"I heard that the VR version of this game felt completely different from the normal version, so I decided to buy the Niso VR console and try the immersive feeling of the VR version. ”

……

Wang Qian's fifth issue of "The Truth" has also caused huge controversy on the Internet.

Many parents of students complained about this episode, saying that it frightened their primary school students, causing them to have mental problems, afraid to sleep alone at night, and unwilling to go to school the next day.

Originally, there were many people in the TV industry who were unhappy with Wang Qian, but after Wang Qian became the director of the Shaohu Radio and Television Bureau and the director of Shaohu TV, there were even more people who were unhappy with him. As soon as these people saw that the opportunity had come, they all made all kinds of noise and exaggerations, infinitely exaggerating the negative impact of "The Truth" on teenagers.

The matter became bigger and bigger, and finally Ma Wenxuan of the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television called Wang Qian and asked him to be cautious when making programs, not to do too terrifying programs, which are easy to be criticized, and he is not easy to explain to the above.

"Is this show terrifying? It's just a dried corpse, teenagers haven't seen a dried corpse? The museum also openly exhibits dried corpses from ancient times! This is scared, isn't it too psychologically fragile?" Wang Qian disagreed.

"But the dried corpses in the museum won't run around, right?" Ma Wenxuan's face was black.

In the end, Wang Qian could only compromise, and would no longer produce such a terrifying show in the future, so as not to embarrass Ma Wenxuan.

Although Ma Wenxuan tried his best to help Wang Qian eliminate the negative impact of "Truth 5", of course those who were unhappy with Wang Qian would not let go of this opportunity, and they continued to crusade on the Internet, strongly demanding that Wang Qian get out of the TV circle.

There are also some TV program producers who are unhappy with Wang Qian, and they also create all kinds of news and try all kinds of ways to attack Wang Qian.

For example, a certain TV station has a new news program, claiming that the students of a certain school are addicted to "Glory of the Emperor", and the school has made a very serious punishment: hold a mobile phone destruction meeting, smash it with a hammer, throw it into a bucket! The parents of the students applauded one after another, and then accused their children of being addicted to the game of the micro-communication company and could not extricate themselves, and the micro-communication company harmed a whole generation.

……

Of course, Wang Qian will not let anyone attack.

"Welcome to this issue of "The Voice of Justice", in this issue of "The Voice of Justice", we talk about the school smashing mobile phones. ”

"With the popularization of mobile phones, many students will have their own mobile phones, the problem is, if the school does not bring mobile phones, I don't know how to deal with it when you are studying? Some school teachers find that students bring mobile phones may be confiscated until the holidays, but some schools have made more serious punishments: hold a mobile phone destruction meeting, smash it with a hammer, and throw it into a bucket!"

"According to reports, the incident occurred in a middle school in Nanhe, dozens of mobile phones confiscated from the hands of students were destroyed in public, in this regard, the school staff said that the mobile phone to the school is not handed over to the teacher, and if you secretly play "Glory of the Emperor", it will be destroyed once it is found, "parents are very cooperative, everything is for the good of students". ”

Let's take a look at the comments of netizens on this matter. ”

I just smiled and didn't speak. ”

"Why don't parents take it home?

"It's disgusting, I say it's for the good of the students at every turn!"

"I deserve it! I should have smashed them all! So that I won't be pitted by elementary school students when I beat the king. ”

"It's all legally illiterate, and when I saw these strange behaviors in school, I realized that everyone's legal awareness was shattered by the school. ”

"Destroying other people's property for more than 5,000 yuan should be punished, right?"

"I especially can't understand that it is purely a simple legal issue, illegal possession and damage of other people's property, the circumstances are serious, the amount of money is huge, the impact is vile, the matter is handled by people, go to the public security bureau or the court to file a lawsuit, and arrest the school leaders and teachers concerned should be judged in any way, why should they come out to judge? How can there be room for judgment for this kind of criminal behavior? Why does everyone want to use ethics to set aside the law?"

"It is recommended that teachers also smash their mobile phones and computers, which is also for the good of students, how to concentrate on education when teachers play with mobile phones and surf the Internet during class time, and how to set an example for students?"

"The main thing is that you, as a student and a parent of a student, can't object even if you are unhappy, which is the most sassy. ”

"Parents definitely disagree, but they don't dare to say it. ”

"It's the same as forcibly evicting people, an abuse of power. ”

……

In an interview, a relevant person from the school said that the school's high-profile ban on aircraft was to create a strong learning atmosphere. ”

"The school did not allow the use of mobile phones, confiscated them and destroyed them in public. Yesterday morning, five or six students successively called the "Voice of Justice" to complain that at about 7 o'clock in the morning, after the school's routine flag-raising ceremony, in front of thousands of teachers and students in the school, the school leaders smashed dozens of confiscated students' mobile phones in public and threw them into buckets. ”

"Several students excitedly said that the mobile phone was purchased by the parents, and the school destroyed it without authorization.

A boy in his first year of high school said that half a month ago, the school issued a strict ban on students from carrying and using mobile phones, and signed an agreement with the parents of students. According to the experience of other schools and the actual situation of our school, it is strictly forbidden for students to carry and use mobile phones after entering the school, and if they are found, they will be confiscated and publicly destroyed. ”

"If the student refuses to hand it over, the student will be punished according to the circumstances up to and including being ordered to withdraw from the school. After this regulation was put into effect, every morning and evening, school leaders, class teachers and other teachers inspected from time to time, and once found, their mobile phones were immediately confiscated. Even mobile phones worth thousands of yuan, such as strawberries and mountain stars, were confiscated. ”

The boy said that in front of all the teachers and students of the school, the chairman of the school union carried several file bags, took out dozens of confiscated mobile phones inside, smashed them with a sledgehammer in front of the students, and then poured them into the bucket with a hula la. As soon as this move came out, it caused a commotion among everyone, and they jumped up and wanted to see what was going on. But it was too far away to see what the phone looked like. ”

The student also claimed that after dozens of mobile phones were destroyed in public, school leaders suspected that students in two classes were still carrying mobile phones, and that they were left behind to be checked one by one like plane security checks. ”

Another student said that recently, the school has banned students from carrying and using mobile phones, and students secretly use them, forming a stalemate between light and dark. Yesterday afternoon, he took advantage of the break to introduce to reporters through his mobile phone that inside and outside the classroom, monitoring equipment was installed in many places on the campus, and after the school ban was issued, everyone did not dare to use mobile phones rashly. ”

Even when communicating with reporters, he sneaked into the stairwell, covered it with books, and hurriedly made up text messages. In doing so, I didn't dare to publicize it loudly, nor did I dare to inform my classmates, for fear that they would report it to the teacher and put on small shoes for myself. He said that his every move was like a gangster in a movie, which was very mysterious. ”

Another student, who asked not to be named, said that they were born in the 00s of this century, and since childhood, various electronic products, including mobile phones, have been accompanied by them, and they have become a part of life. The school's one-size-fits-all ban sounds like it cares about everyone, but in doing so, it actually invisibly deprives everyone of their rights and interests. ”

Parents and students have their own opinions on this. ”

One student said indignantly that there is no law that allows citizens to use communication tools normally if they comply with the law. Several of the students interviewed said that in their view, the ban on computers introduced by the school was almost too much. At present, information is developed, and they need to understand the outside world while learning knowledge. In response to this situation, the school should consider it humanely. ”

"For example, before class every day, give the phone to the teacher for safekeeping, and then return it to the individual when the school is out in the afternoon, leaving 20 minutes of private space for the students to dispose of by themselves. ”

The school's move has caused a lot of confusion and discussion among students, but almost all of the parents interviewed agree with the school's approach. They say that the age of 15 or 6 is the golden season for storing knowledge, and holding a mobile phone to surf the Internet every day will naturally distract one's energy, and it will be difficult to improve one's academic performance. ”

A parent surnamed Li said that he would very much welcome the ban on middle school students. He said that going to school to seek knowledge was a long and lonely journey. As a student, you must endure loneliness and learn systematically through hard reading and organized learning under the guidance of teachers, so as to master a variety of knowledge. Obtaining knowledge or reading through mobile phones is shallow reading, and this information can be stored and mastered by everyone through short-term charging, and professional knowledge, only through systematic learning, can be integrated into the mind and create excellent results. ”

As the leader of the campus ban incident, the chairman of the school trade union said in an interview: The school is forced to do this out of desperation. In the current era of advanced information, mobile phones playing games and surfing the Internet not only make many adults love it, but also the favorite of underage children. In order to purify the learning environment and create a strong learning atmosphere, the school stiffened its wrist to eliminate students from bringing mobile phones into the campus. The promulgation of this school rule has received a positive response from the majority of parents. ”

The purpose of this move is to make an example to students who continue to use mobile phones on campus, and the union president also claimed that they are not the first to ban students from using mobile phones on campus, and he knows of many schools that have done so. ”

"The Voice of Justice" believes that confiscating mobile phones and destroying them in public, it is hard to imagine that such a brutal scene can take place in a teaching and educating school. The barbaric behavior of the school not only directly harms the students, but also gives them a bad hint of growth. ”

The school said the purpose of the move was to set an example for students who used mobile phones at school. But are students chickens or monkeys? Is education an example? Although it is only a metaphor, it exposes the deviation of educational philosophy. ”

"The destruction of students' mobile phones is not a new initiative for this school, it has been seen in other schools before, and all kinds of similar absurd regulations are not uncommon on campus. ”

"Some schools prohibit students from coming into contact with students who are not in their own class, some schools stipulate that meals and snacks cannot be purchased from outside the school, and some schools require that the distance between boys and girls should not be less than a few centimeters, to put it mildly, these are all typical educational violence. Has the introduction of the system been fully demonstrated, especially has the opinions of the students been listened to? Has the implementation of the system taken into account the feelings of the students? What should be done if it causes psychological harm to the students?"

"The "Truth" program is a little scary, there are so many people who complain that they have caused psychological harm to students, and the school smashes mobile phones in front of all teachers and students, so violent acts and damage to other people's property will not cause psychological harm to students?"

"It is worth noting that the school, including some parents, will always find many reasons for the absurd rules, and the most common argument is that the school's original intentions are good. For example, the school that destroyed mobile phones stipulated that students' mobile phones would be confiscated and destroyed, and it was said that parents agreed. ”

"But is a good intention the same as the right behavior? Can a parent's consent violate the law? Compulsory search of students' school bags and public destruction of students' belongings are not only barbaric, but also suspected of violating the law! It is untenable to be reasonable. If the original intention is good, but the mistake is caused by an accident in the process, it may be interpreted as doing something wrong with good intentions, but something like destroying a mobile phone is simply taking the initiative to do something wrong, how can you talk about kindness!"

"We don't need to beautify the behavior of students with mobile phones, we take it for granted that it can facilitate students to find information, etc., in general, students bring mobile phones to play more than study, and even some students play "Glory of the Emperor". If students are keen to play with mobile phones, it is likely to cause distraction and affect learning, so many schools also advocate that students do not bring mobile phones to school. ”

"The key is that advocacy is necessary, it is a reminder, a guide, but the initiative is still in the hands of the students. Even if a student uses a cell phone at an inappropriate time and it is confiscated, the phone should be returned to the student after educating him/her. However, once advocacy becomes compulsory, the nature changes completely, and it is inevitable that students will be resented. ”

"Education is not only the inheritance of book knowledge, but also the process of cultivating and shaping students' character, the barbaric behavior of the school not only directly harms the students, but also gives the students some bad hints to the growth, so that after the students enter the society, they will also take such violent means against the people around them, because they receive such education in school. ”

"Our education must be student-centered, and the formulation and implementation of school rules must follow the laws of education and respect students' rights. As society develops, students' awareness of their rights is rapidly improving, so why bother to apologize and revise the regulations when students react emotionally? In such a repetition, it is not only the rights of students who are hurt, but also the spirit of education and the dignity of educators. ”

At the end of the program, "Voice of Justice" also wanted to say a few words of its own opinion on education in Huaguo. ”

"Why do our students not like the current way of education, but prefer to be addicted to mobile phones? Should our education system reflect on the problems with this way of education? In the past, China was very poor and needed a lot of cheap labor to build the world's factory, so this kind of concentration camp education was born. Now that China's economy has developed, there are fewer and fewer labor-intensive industries, and it is time to change the concentration camp-style education method! It is time for our children to unleash their natural instincts!"

"If the education method is reformed into a form of edutainment, with a variety of interesting activities and interesting education methods, it will naturally win children away from mobile phones. If the child really doesn't want to learn, there is nothing wrong with playing "Glory of the Emperor"! In the future, when he grows up, he can still engage in live game broadcasting! Even if he doesn't engage in live game broadcasting, he can write and upgrade his skills in the newly built literary network of Weixin Company, and he can eat with his own interests, so why hang himself on a tree?"

"As far as I know, in the new literary network of our micro-news company, there have been several authors who only have primary school education to become great gods and platinum gods, and they can achieve an annual salary of millions, tens of millions, or even more than 100 million yuan by relying on the knowledge level of primary school, in this case, why do you have to force the child to do things that he is unwilling to do and do not like to do?"

"Interest is the best teacher, our entire generation of youth has been ruined in the 'educational concentration camps' of that era, we should not let this tragedy continue in our next generation, our children are not born to become cheap labor in the world's factories, they have their nature, their interests, let them develop in their interests, we properly guide them is the most correct way. ”

"If you like it, then let him! Who knows if he will become the sixth white in the Central Plains in the future? If you like games, then play games! Even if you do a live game broadcast in a micro-communication company, if you don't play too badly, you won't earn less money a month than most graduates who graduated from college but have no skills. ”

"How to make interest the best teacher for children should be what our education management department, education practitioners, and parents should study and discuss. Blindly pushing the responsibility for the failure of children's education to the mobile phone and "Glory of the Emperor" not only does not help, but it is easy to form a kind of inert thinking, cling to the defects, and continue to continue the previous concentration camp-style education method and do not let go, which is in fact a dereliction of duty on the part of the education authorities and education practitioners. ”

"Nowadays, if China wants to achieve a leap in science and technology and productivity, and wants to further increase GDP, it needs talents who can fly their minds and have the ability to take the initiative to create, rather than the cheap labor in sweatshops trained in education camps. ”

"I'm the host Wang Qian! Thank you!"