At the same time, "Defending the Earth", which was released at the same time as "2012", film reviews about Pan American Entertainment's blockbuster film also began to appear on the Internet.

It's just surprising that compared to the strong reaction of audiences and journalists, some well-known film critics seem flat, as if they are deliberately evasive and unwilling to make any comments on the film.

Even if someone evaluates "Defend the Earth", it is all some high-sounding routines, and after saying it, I just can't see whether these people think the movie "Defend the Earth" is good or bad?

Because the reaction of the audience and reporters is strong, it is because they all say that the movie is not good, too old-fashioned.

Some of the more extreme fans even scolded Pan American Entertainment on the Internet for deceiving their feelings, and this "Defending the Earth" is not as good as advertised.

"Oh my God! After watching it for 10 minutes, I can guess what the final ending is, and this plot is terrible. ”

"Is this also a blockbuster? Is it a super blockbuster that Pan American Entertainment spent 200 million yuan on Zuò? God, isn't this really a joke?"

"Aside from the special effects, which are a bit of a sight to behold, the rest is simply useless. ”……

Both the media and the audience gave Pan Am Entertainment a bad review of the blockbuster that had just been released, because the film did not surprise them.

Most people's comments are not that this movie is shoddy, but the plot is really bad.

In terms of graphics and special effects alone, if this movie was put 10 years ago, it would definitely be a classic.

But the audience and the media have long been tired of this kind of plot similar to the hero saving the world at the last second, so to speak, as long as you watch it for 10 minutes, the next plot can basically be guessed, and it is not bad.

In particular, the media has given merciless ridicule to Pan American Entertainment and Corkley.

Whoever made the previous movie publicity, Pan American Entertainment almost didn't promote this movie in the sky, a rare classic on the earth, and you will definitely regret it if you don't watch it, which makes everyone who has watched this movie feel that they really regret it.

It's not as good as advertised.

It can be said that Pan Am Entertainment's pre-release publicity does not match the quality of the film itself, and this strong contrast makes all media and audiences taste it.

The next day, when the newspapers of various media outlets came out, they basically praised "2012" and criticized the news reports of "Defending the Earth".

And Garcia also made a large film on "2012" in his own special version, giving 8. A high score of 6 points.

"2012: The End of the Earth Disaster Movie!"

"The first point to say is that "2012" is much cooler than the disaster films in Hollywood history, much more spectacular, simply a hundred times or even ten million times! "2012" will inevitably stand as the first disaster film in the history of the world for a long time. ”

"With the cooperation of the huge screen and surround sound of the theater, the spectacular scene of the film is really brought into full play! "2012" is simply a work of God! There are no words to describe it!"

"There are so many exciting scenes in the film, and many times it is nervous, especially at the end of the film, the heart beats as fast as if I have just finished a cross-country race. ”

"After the film ended, I also asked myself, can we be selfless in the face of disasters? Hundreds of millions of people lost their lives in an instant, and the sentence that the damned did not die and did not deserve to die is still important at this time? Although this is just a movie and will not happen in n years, it still tells us some truth. Just like the central idea of previous disaster movies, if we don't take care of the only earth, disasters will really happen, and there will not be a happy ending like in the movie. ”

At the end of Garcia's review of his special edition, he gave a very high evaluation to Yang Ming's human moral choices at the end of the movie.

Compared with Garcia's one-sided praise, many other film critics who watched "2012" also gave positive reviews, and "2012" is indeed worthy of their evaluation.

However, there is one person who is more unusual, and made a strong criticism of "2012" on his own media page.

"This is a movie with empty scenes and an impetuous plot, except for special effects, there is nothing surprising about the whole movie, and the logic of the plot is very unreasonable. ”

"There is no suspense, no accidents, only survival that makes people visually tired, and the embarrassing humanitarian spirit under the imminent disaster. ”

"The plot and the characters are a bit flattering. ”

"The rhythm of the film is not very tight, basically waiting for the big scene, and I don't have any expectations for the plot. Especially at the end, it took a long time to get a floodgate, and the plot was childish and ridiculous. ”

Anderson made a very caustic review of "2012" on his media page, and when his special page came out, it immediately caused an uproar among everyone who saw this film review.

It's so shameless.

It's simply reversing black and white, referring to a deer as a horse.

Yang Mingtong Guò Barber also knew this Anderson's evaluation of his own movie, he still didn't believe it, he went to buy a newspaper in person, read it carefully, and said to himself in surprise: "I shouldn't have a blood feud with him, right?"

He really couldn't figure out how a person could say it the other way around.

However, Yang Ming quickly put this matter in the back of his mind, because his attention is now on the box office results, and he doesn't have the heart to pay attention to these at all, and believes that Barber will handle it.

And he believed that this Anderson film critic quickly regretted this statement.

Indeed, Anderson quickly regretted his review after it was published.

Because among all the positive film reviews of "2012" in the media that day, Anderson's negative film reviews are simply the sun in the starry sky, and Tainyima attracts attention.

In particular, the words he said in film reviews have attracted countless controversies, and of course, scolding.

"I really doubt that with this person's IQ, how can he become a film critic and have his own media section? ”

"It can't be that you have received black money, right? This kind of shameless movie review can also be written?"

"This gentleman named Anderson, can you disclose your address, I promise not to kill you. ”

"Reading this movie review is simply lowering our IQ. ”。

Many fans of Yang Ming, as well as fans who have watched "2012", after reading this film review, after a short period of stunned, they are even more indignant, and it is estimated that if Anderson appears in front of them, he will definitely be killed.

The media and other Hollywood celebrities were also amazed that Anderson had written such a film review, and they really didn't expect Anderson to dare to write such a film review that reversed black and white.

Film critics use Spring and Autumn penmanship or crooked buttocks, which is generally not a big problem, even if there is a little controversy, it is fine, but it is outrageous to be as black as Anderson so thoroughly and so disregarding the facts.

There's definitely an inside story in this!