It is said that primitive people had neither numbers nor words, but they often encountered the problem of whether there were more pearls or more shells.

To solve this kind of problem, they put one pearl in one shell and another pearl in another, and they do so all the time...... If the pearls are used up and there are still some shells left, they know that there are more shells than pearls, and vice versa. If they run out of both, they know that there are as many pearls as there are shells.

This one-to-one correspondence allows them to compare the number of pearls or shells without having to consider the exact number of them.

[This primitive method of equal distribution, derived from ignorance, if modern people travel through other worlds and do not know how to use it, they are real fools - I have not yet read this kind of writings of the stars. 】

It was under the inspiration of this method that the German mathematician Cantor defined the concept of one-to-one correspondence and founded set theory, which greatly promoted the development of modern mathematics.

When I think about it, I don't believe in this legend, but prefer to believe that this is the interpretation and speculation of later generations on the distribution method of primitive people, rather than believing that it is true.

This may be the reason why clever people find the way of thinking and acting in the ignorant era of their predecessors.

[Words spoken] "Scholars have two taboos, self-exaltation and self-narrowness, self-exaltation is like a cliff, rain and water do not hang, self-narrowness is like an urn, the head water is difficult to accommodate, good at learning it is like the sea, and there is no shortage of dissatisfaction."

This is a poem that many people are familiar with, and even memorized backwards, I will now use the true distance of language to peek through the loopholes, and find many strict mistakes of people.

First, we prove the mechanical inevitability of self-exaltation and self-narrowing;

Second, the effect of self-exaltation and self-narrowing in learning and its characteristics of time and time are analyzed more comprehensively;

3. The great distance of the metaphor;

Fourth, self-exaltation is not as good as a cliff, and it is not as narrow as an urn, why should it be like an ocean to learn well, and it is also a great ability to learn a little bit of common sense.

Kindness is too general, what is good, what techniques are good, I think this is the most important thing.

, I have never advocated any taboos, full of self-overflow, the road is narrow and there is another way, the urn is lost, how do you know if it is a blessing?

== As mentioned above in 1987, it was Yue Pingqiang who solved people.

【Words spoken】Red, yellow, blue, white, black, Han Manchu returned to Mongolia and Tibet.

The person being taught should be smarter than the person who teaches it in order to grasp it better.

Singles trees and cacti are the same ones that have withstood the rigors of nature's drought.

Among them, the singles tree may have been 'built' by me in 1987, just for that "Villain".

The 20-year-old Engels once said to a friend: "Work, life, and the vigor of young people are the most important things in life." ”

A lot of words are said to be worthless to cry, no matter how wonderful the idea, what a genius power!

Even though we are full of pride, we don't express it.

Fakashan's war poem: "It doesn't matter if you suffer, as long as the doctrine is true, if you lose one of you, you will be happy for a billion people." The warrior made his voice heard.

It is needless to say whether he 'suffered' or not.

If one billion people can be happy if 'I lose one', the happiness of the people will come too easily, right?

Are we aware of the limitations of our knowledge......

The secret phenomenon of sentences, the good sentences obtained under passion, often lack accuracy and do not stand up to rational scrutiny. For example, scolding the driver and my own 'leave my song here' and so on.

The phenomenon of unpondered blowouts of language is another key topic that we should pay attention to in the thinking of de-truth.

Compared with the sacrificial spirit of willing to 'lose one of me', the most criticized thing is the ancient funeral system.

According to the oracle bone inscriptions, the largest number of slaughters of human and animal was 2,656. This number is exquisite, and it is very different from our perceptual number jù "billion", which is a number that people use mathematics and numerical numbers to study.

Even the numbers are so sensible, why do they do unreasonable bloody and cruel evil deeds of burying them alive?

How do they balance the evil deeds of the funeral with the good deeds that can be attained in the body?

This is no longer a kind of cognitive ignorance, nor is it a pathological psychology named by modern people, it is a kind of distorted formation of concepts. In the face of that concept, funeral is no longer an evil act, but as it should be......

The emperor of heaven, the emperor of the earth, people are different, birds come in pairs, and they make wedding clothes for others. The thoughts of our predecessors are not something that we can fully taste on the tip of our modern tongue. That's why some people use modesty to whitewash their ignorance.

Or the 'gentleman' said it well: "I don't even have hypocrisy, and I have to borrow some modesty to be humble!"

Under rational conditions, a huge distance can also be generated, which is an important issue that cannot be bypassed by the true distance of language and must be faced with all our might.

There are a number of chickens, they have a total of 50 heads, and 140 legs, ask how many chickens and rabbits? This is the famous chicken-rabbit cage problem.

Suppose there is a ridiculous situation below, when counting the number of feet, some golden roosters are independent, and some rabbits stand up, what should I do?

This is already another issue and cannot be equated with the previous one. Nor can it be explained by the answer to the previous question. Problems are constantly changing, and a problem always has its own preconditions, even if it happens to the same thing, the problem is not the same......

And our thinking is facing different problems that arise in the same thing, and there is often an inexplicable continuity to continue the last thinking.

This is the distraction that our minds need to get rid of!