In the radio cluster of the starting point, I met the famous chicken-rabbit co-cage test again, this is another version, and it is indeed the first time I have seen this solution.

Shen Zhou also mentioned it in the article "No. 027 of the "Re-deletion of Thoughts" volume of "The Source of Intelligence". But the number jù is different!

The shining point of this broadcast is not the solution itself, but the way of thinking of "seeking common ground while reserving differences" to solve problems.

The way of thinking has its own ins and outs. From the language and writing, you can understand it.

It's nothing, it's the real price to be able to use it. It's really worth it not only for problem solving, but also for widespread use.

Difficult problems are not easy to solve.

Grasp the commonalities and find out the differences; after opening up the commonalities, the "Mr. Dongguo" mixed in will naturally not be able to hide. It's also a management trick.

The simpler the trick, the more practical it is, and it's a good example of simplifying a complex problem.

At its core, it's all about swarming!

In a collective, no shrewd leader wants chickens and rabbits to be in the same cage.

If this happens in his team, he's either preparing another cage if he doesn't clean it up.

If someone is too different, no matter how clever, capable, and capable you are, whether you become a rabbit in a flock or a chicken in a rabbit team, your result will be unfortunate!

Alternative, go find another way, this is not the place for you.

Even if you are the strongest, you are recognized as the strongest, but what can you do? If you insist on staying, it is equivalent to who is sinking the boat now.

Then, you will be treated the same as who is sinking the boat today—the worst!

In a collective, there must be commonality. In order to unify the pace, 'the same pace, the battle is won'. Therefore, there must be a unified guiding ideology.

Therefore, if the main position of the organizational structure is one, it is easy to have problems.

Different voices can only be subordinate, and the uniqueness of the main job is the law! No matter how strong the different voices are, at most they are only the ability of the rules, and they are destined to be suppressed.

This is most important for a newcomer to an organization.

If it can't be unified, there must be miscellaneous.

At this time, it is necessary to use the means of seeking common ground while reserving differences to separate the dissent. It's like separating a chicken from a cage.

Again, the key words in this article are "same, different, divided!"

Okay, let's take a look at the topic.

Attached: Jin Zixiu: My local tyrant friend has never read a book, but the business is quite large, and I have always been curious.

I went to visit him today, and finally found the answer! His son is doing his homework, and he can't answer any questions, so he asked us to help!

The question is: 15 chickens and rabbits, 40 legs, how many chickens and rabbits? I answer, "Let the number of chickens be X and the number of rabbits be Y...... I haven't figured out the answer yet, my friend has already given the answer!

He said that it is strange that those of you who have studied are not crippled, and his algorithm is: assuming that both chickens and rabbits are well trained, blow a whistle, lift one foot, 40-15 = 25. Then blow the whistle again, and raise one more foot, 25-15=10, and then the chickens are sitting on the ground, and the rabbits are still standing on two feet. So, there are 10÷2=5 rabbits and 15-5=10 chickens.

So his son was first in the math exam. This kind of algorithm makes the Olympiad teachers embarrassed!

Besides: the problem itself is not very simple, with the authentic solution, after all, it is a binary equation, and it is difficult to calculate it orally.

But there is such an easy way for us to figure it out, and if we don't see it, I don't believe it!

I've been enlightened, how about you?

Is there any other solution?