In Genesis, a reader named "Thank You" posted a long book review that reads as follows:

"This article is a bit high, not low.

It can be seen that the author is a person of a certain age, who has read some books and has a certain amount of knowledge. I don't know what the author thought when he first chose the topic and set the outline? Writing is the same as making products, if you want to be popular, you must first understand what type of readers you write to, where these readers are, and what their needs and preferences are. Obviously, the average level of readers is not as good as the author's daily communication circle cognition. But the article came out in large numbers of things that are professional, but what the author thinks is common sense. Once you have chosen a platform whose features prefer a certain form of content, you should reshape your consciousness structure to match the characteristics of the medium and communication.

In addition, the author selected classic investment cases, people and events from the late 90s to shape the main path. But in terms of dramatic conflict and character building, the landing point is very low. The dramatic conflict is not interesting, it is not high enough, and the conflict events are particularly mismatched with these classic cases. There is a pattern in strategy, a strategy in tactics, and details in execution to be full of wisdom and moving. American dramas have a story in each episode, and an overall suspense is set up in each season. As a result, it was written that the business war was not a business war, and the gold finger was not a gold finger, and there were a lot of trivial things. The character creation is also very thin, a good character will be three-dimensional and plump even if it appears for a short time, and the reader needs to have emotional traction for the characters in it. The author writes books that many times feel that other people have bad brains, making the pattern very low, especially mediocre. For example, when writing about Sun Hongbin, it is all a side description, he and the protagonist are characters who have experienced several chapters of an event, but the author completely explained the matter as if he was in a hurry, and the character was not buried at all. You are writing history, the entire late 90s and early 20th century, such a magnificent change in the human world for 20 years, the history created by these characters, is written by you like this, it is a pity. Even if you are joking, it is an innovation plane, don't you feel sorry for yourself?

Tang Miaomiao's setting is a huge failure. The wider the dissemination of a work, the more consideration should be given to its sensitivity and beliefs that embody the author's values. ”

The above is the comment of this book friend, although you only gave me three stars, but because you wrote very seriously, I decided to reply seriously.

To refine the core of this book friend's comment, there are several main points:

1. The platform is not right, you shouldn't choose Genesis, or since you are in Genesis, don't write about this kind of theme.

A: I said this in my testimonials on the shelves, it was a mistake at the time, and the first issue pointed to Genesis instead of the starting point, but now that I look at it, the readership of Genesis is not as this reader said, I think it's okay.

2. Dramatic conflict and character building.

Answer: I don't shy away from character building, it is indeed incomparable with the character creation of some great gods, but in terms of drama conflicts, I may not understand as a reader, how strict the review of the urban class is now, and the low landing point is also a helpless move. Of course, I do not deny that as an author, I may indeed have better ways of expressing and dealing with conflicts myself, but that way of writing is too dangerous.

As an online article, the type of this book determines that in addition to a few main supporting roles, it is impossible to spend too much ink on each supporting role in the early stage, which also makes readers feel like they are in a hurry. However, it was a rush, laughs. Four or five thousand words a day, and there is no manuscript saved, it is written and distributed now, even if it is Jin Yong, take a look at the first edition and the more mature triptych version that he serialized in Ming Pao, it is almost two. Therefore, I humbly accept the criticism in this regard, but I can't change it, so I can only rely on writing more and gradually improving the level to meet the needs of this part of the readers.

3. Issues that embody the author's values, beliefs, and disseminate ideas.

A: This is just an online serial, written for everyone's entertainment. In addition, emphasis, underline,

I never think that authors have the obligation and the right to spread their own values and ideas to readers!

Every reader, an adult, has their own worldview, values, outlook on life, I don't want to be an evangelist and teach readers, but I just want to be a tour guide, so that readers can see the scenery that they don't usually see.

Letting a tour guide do what the instructor should do is not only the guide's inadequacy, but also the instructor's irresponsibility.

As for the tourists who have already seen these scenes, and even those who are in the midst of them themselves, of course, they will know more about the mystery than the author. But know that most readers are not, they are all coming to this attraction for the first time. Being able to write interestingly, make them interested in the scenery, and feel that it is not in vain, I think the role of this book has been achieved. Moreover, this opinion of yours, and the first opinion you said, is actually contradictory, isn't it?

We often inexplicably elevate the role of online literature, hoping that online literature can be more in-depth. But in fact, depth and breadth are also contradictory, and it is rare for online literature to cover breadth, and as for depth, frankly speaking, so far, no Internet book has really had depth, even the works of a well-received son-in-law and a drunkard.

A senior executive of an online article once said that in today's online articles, it is impossible for such works in the name of the people to appear in online articles, for many reasons, you can take a look at this interview, I think it makes sense.

The above is a reply.,Finally, let's talk about today's update.,It should be two chapters today.,But there's no guarantee.,Tomorrow will be a complete recovery of the double update.。

br painting Tai Sui