"Presiding Judge, can I make a request?" This time it was Lian Lian, the legal counsel of Jucai Company, who spoke. ΩＥ ΩΩ％．

The presiding judge frowned slightly: "Don't say things that don't matter. ”

"Okay. Lian Lian nodded and said, "At the second hearing, we provided the appraisal report of the appraisal company, but the plaintiff raised doubts, and then agreed that the court would entrust the appraisal agency to conduct the appraisal again. This time, the court commissioned a total of two institutions to conduct appraisals, and the results of these two appraisals are completely consistent with those provided by us. This shows that the plaintiff has falsified the contract, and it also shows that the plaintiff is falsely accusing us, which has caused great damage to our reputation and caused mental damage to the relevant parties of the defendant. Therefore, we ask the court to take into account the plaintiff's moral compensation and compensation for lost work when making a judgment. ”

"Defendant, the appraisal results can explain some problems, but they cannot determine that the other party has the intention of making false accusations. Moreover, the plaintiff is a pure farmer, and many of his families are in a state of poverty and belong to the disadvantaged group. On both counts, the Court cannot uphold what you have just said. The presiding judge rejected Lian Lian's proposal.

We believe that the other party has made false contracts without permission, made trouble in our company many times, and finally used false accusations to defraud. Lian Lian's words changed, "After this verdict, our company will immediately sue the other party and sue them for these frauds." ”

The presiding judge said in a deep voice: "Defendant, your remarks have nothing to do with this case, please don't mention it again." ”

"Presiding judge, please give us another chance, we have to find an appraisal agency to conduct a new appraisal. Chu Jiaxiong fought again.

The presiding judge's tone was very cold: "Plaintiff, you have already made this request just now, and I have also replied that 'the court will not support it'. In this case, which has been evaluated twice by three institutions, do you not believe in the competence of these institutions, or do you doubt the professional ethics of these institutions, or do you have doubts about our courts?"

Yu Jiaxiong hurriedly said: "Don't dare, I just want to add another appraisal item, because ......"

The presiding judge waved his hand: "I shouldn't have interrupted you, but I have respected your request last time, and I have specially found two different institutions to do the appraisal for this purpose." Is there any suspicion of deliberate delay in making such a request now? The court will not block the conduct you want to evaluate, but today we are going to make a judgment on this lawsuit. Okay, let's make a final statement. The plaintiff came first. ”

After stabilizing his emotions a little, Zhu Jiaxiong said: "Honorable presiding judges, judges, and jurors: Everyone has worked hard! Thank you to the court for giving us the opportunity to make a final statement. In this case, the judge held the trial in strict accordance with the relevant procedures, and also respected some of our requests, and we did not question the fairness and impartiality of the court, and expressed our gratitude to the court for its appropriate understanding. The court does not support the re-appraisal in this lawsuit, and we understand, but after the end of this trial, we still have to conduct the appraisal unilaterally again.

We are a whole group of farmers in the mountain village, and we filed this lawsuit in order to reasonably and legally fight for our rights and interests. In the eyes of many wealthy people, especially many large companies, the rights and interests we claim may be insignificant or even worth mentioning. However, this is an important source of income for the 21 peasant households, and the hope of 97 men, women, and children facing the loess with their backs to the sky. Regardless of the final verdict, we respect the verdict and accept it. However, we will continue to fight for our rights and interests, and we will continue to take up legal weapons to defend our reasonable demands. Judges, we are indeed a vulnerable group, a truly vulnerable group, please ......"

Listening to Chu Jiaxiong's statement, Chu Tianqi nodded secretly, and said in his heart: He is worthy of being a legal worker of the Legal Aid Center, and he is worthy of being well-known in Dingye City, and it is not easy to listen to this final statement. It not only affirmed the work of the judges, expressed respect for the court and the tribunal, but also deliberately emphasized the weak position of the plaintiffs, and also showed a firm and indomitable attitude. Chu Jiaxiong's entire statement can be said to be reasonable, powerful, and responsible.

At the end of the plaintiff's statement, the presiding judge asked the defendant to make a statement.

Lian Lian smiled at the judge: "Honorable presiding judge, judges, and jurors: Thank you for your hard work, and thank you for giving us the opportunity to make this statement." Modern society is a society governed by the rule of law, and the people's courts are exemplary institutions that strictly enforce the rule of law, and they are also practitioners of 'everything that relies on evidence'. In this case, the evidence was conclusive and the facts were clear. I believe in the courts, in our people's judges, and in your fair and just judgments, based on the facts and the law." That's it, thank you. ”

Chu Tianqi noticed that although Lian Lian's statement was very concise, it was very rigorous, and he firmly grasped the strong point for his own side - the evidence. Her words seem to be objective, but they put a high hat on the judge without a trace, although these words have no impact on the judgment, but at least they do not arouse the judge's disgust. Moreover, she deliberately emphasized 'based on the facts, the law as the criterion', and at the same time emphasized 'fairness and justice', which implies that if the appraisal results are not fully respected, it is unfair and unjust. This is equivalent to an army of judges, but I can't find fault with her words.

After listening to the statements of the two, the presiding judge did not comment, but said directly: "Now the court is adjourned, the collegial panel will deliberate, and the court will resume in 30 minutes." With that, he got up with the other two judges and walked out of the room.

Lian Lian stepped on the rhythm of "click", walked towards the west gate, and when she passed by Chu Tianqi, she stopped and smiled slightly: "Director Chu, Secretary Chu, please give me one or two, how about it?"

"As I said, I'm here to sit in. Chu Tianqi said lightly.

"Oh, listen. Lian Lian nodded, her tone yin and yang, "Secretary Chu is really a pro-man, don't be tired of your body." I heard that the county asked the Public Security Bureau to take the lead in handling this matter, and you did it yourself, then I am relieved. If you encounter difficulties in implementation, please ask Director Chu to lend a hand, and I will trouble you at that time. ”

Of course, I could hear that this woman was sarcastically interfering in this matter, and at the same time showing off her upcoming victory, and even more so mocking herself for working in vain. In the end, the woman did not forget to slap herself in the face with a vague little - to help her execute the villagers herself. Chu Tianqi said coldly: "Don't worry, I will definitely take care of this matter to the end." ”

Seeing the other party gritting his teeth, knowing that the other party was angry, knowing that the other party was a little angry, Lian Lian was very happy, so she continued to stimulate the other party: "You can talk and count, you are a big leader!"

Extremely disgusted with the tone of this woman's speech, Chu Tianqi said in a deep voice: "I know what to do. Of course, I'm always a man who counts. ”

"That's good. After Lian Lian said this, she turned around gracefully and walked out of the room.

Yang Ercheng came to Chu Tianqi and squeezed out a bitter smile: "Thank you, thank you for your hard work." ”

Seeing Yang Ercheng laughing more ugly than crying, knowing that the other party was very bitter in his heart, Chu Tianqi stood up, patted his right hand on the other party's shoulder, did not speak, and walked out.

Suddenly, a long sigh and a woman's sobbing sound rang out in the room behind Chu Tianqi.

……

The 30-minute break was approaching, the plaintiff and the defendant were already sitting in their seats waiting, and the villagers had returned to the auditorium.

Yang Ercheng looked at the auditorium again, and the seat next to the door in his last row was empty, and the other seats did not have the tall figure. He couldn't help but feel a chill in his heart, not because the other party was leaving, but because he understood that the person had no confidence. Since knowing the identity of that person, Yang Ercheng pinned all his hopes on the other party, and now that the other party has no confidence, how can he have confidence?

The clerk walked into the room and shouted again, "All stand up." ”

The crowd responded and stood up.

The three judges walked in through the east gate and stood directly in front of their seats.

It was noted that the presiding judge was holding a piece of paper with handwritten text on it, but the exact contents could not be seen.

The presiding judge glanced at the audience, hesitated slightly, and said: "The case was filed on July 13, and three court sessions were held on July 25, August 9, and August 15. After presentation, presentation of evidence, cross-examination, debate, in-court mediation, and off-court mediation, the court comprehensively considered individual special factors under the premise of 'taking the facts as the basis and the law as the criterion', and formed a judgment after collegial deliberation by the collegial panel. I will now announce the verdict, which will be handed down at a later date. With that, the presiding judge held the piece of paper up in front of him.

Everyone's eyes were drawn to the piece of paper, and they pricked up their ears and listened carefully.

"The collegial panel held that in this case, the biggest disagreement focused on the contents of the two contracts, and it was precisely because of the great difference in the contents of the contracts that the corresponding disputes arose. To this end, the defendant unilaterally conducted an appraisal, and then, at the request of the plaintiff and the defendant, the court entrusted two more institutions to conduct an appraisal. The final result was that there were many inconsistencies between the facts stated by the plaintiff and the appraisal results of the contract provided, and the facts stated by the defendant were consistent with the contract provided by the defendant. Based on this appraisal report and other evidence, the court determined that the defendant's contract should be the original appraisal contract. Speaking of this, the presiding judge paused, glanced at the plaintiff, then withdrew his gaze, and continued, "After deliberation in the collegial hall, the judgment is as follows, and the original ...... is dismissed."

"Wait, wait, don't pronounce a sentence. A man shouted, pushed open the door and burst in.