There are so many things that big data can do, and even when Takahashi first discovered this uncultivated virgin land, he thought that this was not an area that companies should intervene in.

Even, if the data is enough and detailed enough, Wanhu can even effectively predict a person's survival trajectory, what kind of achievements he will achieve, and what position he will have in society.

Because in the eyes of each individual self, it is a very unique life, but under the comparison of big data, a similar template can always be found.

In other words, everyone is not special.

In such a situation, big data can even "predict the future".

If Wanhu obtains such information and knows that some people will have a greater probability of achieving success in the future, then Wanhu can invest in advance.

You can invest in him at a very low price before he has made a fortune.

In this way, even big data looks like a bit of a fortune teller.

But then again, the so-called fortune telling is actually an application of big data.

Judging according to a person's family background, educational background, and his own personality in three dimensions, plus the stage on which the person is about to appear, if you have enough samples, you can judge his future to a certain extent.

And in ancient China, or any ancient country or region of mankind. There will be people who come up with such results simply because they are not guided by a scientific mind, and they only know some superficial things, and they rely on these things to the occult.

For example, in ancient times, fortune telling looked at a person's hand, and if the key was not prominent, it would be said that the person was a nobleman.

Why?

Because of the low productivity in ancient China, most people had to engage in production. And people who are engaged in heavy physical work will have large joints because of the wear and tear of the joints.

And the joint is not large, which means that the person does not have to engage in heavy physical labor, and there is nothing wrong with saying that such a person is a nobleman.

It's just that, for various reasons, those fortune tellers only remember the results, and forget the process of reasoning.

As a result, what is in their mouth becomes a black box.

If the knuckles are not prominent, they are noble, and if they do not have calluses on their hands, they are nobles among nobles.

There's a pig stuffed in from here, and canned pork comes out of there. And they don't care what happens from here to there.

In ancient times, when the productive forces were weak and the degree of control over information was not high, this was all that could be done.

And in a world where electronic information is ubiquitous, it is certainly easy enough to grasp a person's destiny more accurately.

And, in real life, it's never about doing something that will give you feedback on success.

Nothing most of the time.

Therefore, having a way of entertainment with fast positive feedback will make people like it quickly.

And Wanhu can use the data they collect to know what the vast majority of people are anxious about.

If, let their anxiety get a false release in the game, let them have pleasure. Is it from this negative and positive feedback, you can know that the player is completely sinking.

In this case, Wanhu can judge in advance that some people have more development potential, while some people lack development potential.

Isn't that so that those who have development potential can develop, and those who have no development potential can be completely addicted to the game and become the wallet of ten thousand households?

Maybe it's cold to say, and even a little infiltrating.

But it's all based on professional judgment based on statistics.

In other words, in terms of high probability, if a person does not influence and induce him to become addicted to games, he will still become a garbage man.

In this way, since the result is doomed, why can't he become a useful garbage man for thousands of households?

This may be too cruel for one person.

But for most regimes in the world, it's welcome.

Ancient China paid attention to fooling the people, why should we fool the people? How to fool the people? These are all knowledge.

Why fool the people?

Because the more the people know, they will know that the rule of the ancient Chinese regime lacked a kind of legitimacy. It's more like a rogue contract with a rogue clause at its core.

For example, why some people can be emperors.

Is it because a fox barked and said that this man could be emperor, or that when he was born, there was a dragon in the sky? Or did he cut off a white snake instead of sleeping with a white snake?

If a scholar brags about these things that he himself does not believe, it means that he is fooling the people.

In comparison, the country woman who thinks that the emperor shovels the ground with a golden hoe and eats ten white-flour steamed buns a day is more sensible.

Because although she is based on her own knowledge, she does not know what kind of wealth the emperor has and what kind of life he lives.

But she still knew that the emperor was still a person, and he was still a person who did not lack gold, silver, treasure, food, drink and merry.

How can you shovel the ground with a gold hoe if you lack gold jewelry?

If this woman, who lacks knowledge but has a correct foundation, knows more and understands where the emperor's wealth comes from, will she start to rebel against the emperor?

This is like why during the anti-Japanese war, the Northeast Army was the best equipped, but it was the easiest to surrender.

Because the soldiers of the Northeast Army are all foolish soldiers.

They don't know anything, and they can't know anything.

Because Zhang Zuolin himself exists, he is a warlord who serves the book.

If ordinary soldiers want to understand all kinds of military knowledge, they must learn, and in the process of learning, they will think, and they will come into contact with nationalist thoughts.

And after they are civilized, they will no longer be loyal to Zhang Zuolin, the leader of the warlord compradors.

That is, the more educated a soldier is, the more he will run.

Even with a higher level of education, they will directly revolt to overthrow Zhang Zuolin.

Therefore, Zhang Zuolin cannot let the soldiers be educated.

And if the soldier is not educated and has a low level of training, a problem will arise, that is, there is no combat effectiveness.

However, the Northeast Army is well armed and equipped with a lot of people.

Even if you can't defeat the Japanese, can't you defeat other warlords who are inferior to the Northeast Army, and don't you dare to educate other warlords under your command?

Absolutely.

The relationship between the Northeast Army and Zhang Zuolin is basically the relationship between the commoners and the emperor in ancient China.

Emperors who have gained unjust power themselves will educate the people unless they face a huge external crisis and perish if they do not change.

Otherwise, why educate the people?

Educate the populace to rebel against themselves?

This is also the reason why after the unification of the world, starvation was everywhere in the face of famine, and even in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, all countries were highly welfare.

Because welfare is not high, the country will perish.

When the country perishes, the monarch will surely die, but the people have a choice.

And the unification of the country, no matter how bad the user experience is, can it still change to another country?

Therefore, it is said, "invincible foreign patients are immortal." ”

Because the user experience is extremely poor, users will revolt to build a new country.

In ancient China, these users were the poor, that is, the Diao people.