Chapter 257: 'Stealing' and 'Stealing'

However, in addition to criticizing such people who have been poisoned by the imperial examination system, the bigger shadow of Kong Yiji is actually people's misunderstanding and rejection of 'knowledge and intellectuals'. Pen, fun, pavilion www. biquge。 info

There is a saying that if you don't talk more than half a sentence, Kong Yiji can't talk to these adults, because they don't have any other topics except for the real firewood, rice, oil, salt, sauce, vinegar and tea, so he goes to the children and talks to the children.

And left behind the passage that has been ridiculed for nearly half a century, 'Do you know the way to write the word hui?'

The child was indifferent to Kong Yiji's four ways of writing, and even a little impatient.

The last original text is:

Kong Yiji had just dipped his fingernails in wine and wanted to write on the cabinet, but when he saw that I was not enthusiastic, he sighed again, and looked extremely sorry. ’

This description turned the image of Kong Yiji as a 'nerd', he saw that the child was not interested, so he did not write hard, and sighed and chose to give up.

What is a child? A child is the future.

What is Kong Yiji, Kong Yiji is a reader.

Readers teach children to read, but children are not enthusiastic, is this a satire of readers, or a satire of the future?

If Kong Yiji symbolizes knowledge, then Lu Xun's Kong Yiji is only desolate and deeply lonely.

Kong Yiji's character lives a down-and-out life, and he often defaults on drinking money, but he pays it back as long as he has money, which is a person's reputation, but he will steal books.

What does it mean for someone who can steal things to steal books instead of money?

Although Kong Yiji is a little confused and pretentious, is it really his fault?

If most people think that the four ways of writing hui are useful, will Kong Yiji still end up being killed for stealing books?

Although Mr. Lu Xun used it, he was probably dead.

This approximately, too, is intriguing.

'Everything always needs to be studied to understand, it has always been this way, right?' are two sentences from "Diary of a Madman".

Kong Yiji's sadness is not understood by the public, but he will definitely be understood by a few people, just like he steals books, but does not steal money.

Stealing itself is wrong, but it's all stealing, but stealing books feels a little different, maybe because, stealing books, isn't stealing?

The word stealing was originally used for unethical fornication between men and women, in order to steal people and cheat.

The word plagiarism, on the other hand, is a private and humble connotation, and it is used in the context of information and knowledge.

Although both of them are through illegal means, the fundamental meaning is completely different, why did Kong Yiji use this to justify himself, he may just want to tell the onlookers the difference between 'stealing' and 'stealing'.

And the onlookers don't care about this at all, they just want to ridicule and cancel his sour 'intellectual'.

On the question of the difference between 'stealing' and 'stealing', Kong Yiji's method was called 'sophistry' in the ancient Zhuzi Hundred Schools.

But is sophistry just nonsense, and is there no point in excusing oneself?

Hegel, the famous Western philosopher, had an objective explanation for sophistry.

When we talk about sophistry, we always think that it is just a way of thinking that distorts justice and truth and expresses things from a fallacious point of view. But this is not a direct inclination to sophistry. The original view of the sophists was nothing but a 'rationalized argument'. ’

Sophistry, if used correctly, is a spirit of studying the truth, and most people do not have this spirit and way of thinking, they are accustomed to beating people to death with partial generalizations and a stick.

There is no doubt that Kong Yiji is wrong to steal books, but the gap between 'stealing' and 'stealing' is indeed correct.

In the book "Kong Yiji", the 'cheongsam' has always been defined as the pedantic skin of feudal remnants, but in the last scene of "The Big Shot", Wang Yao uses the white sheets of the madhouse as the 'cheongsam', which means asking.

Is this 'cheongsam' really problematic in itself?

'Useless is a scholar

abolished the imperial examination and bent his waist

Cumin is what a body

One-collared kaftan fluttering in the wind'

In the Yue opera "Kong Yiji", the cheongsam is the sustenance and belief of all the spirit of Kong Yiji, if the name of this cheongsam is replaced by culture, it may be another style.

'The short clothes are short and make people laugh, and the long robes are more sloppy.

The golden cicada sheds its shell and leaves the old branches, why not take off the robe and hang it on the treetops.

No, no, no!!

The thousand-year-old spirit is there, the fragrance of books for hundreds of generations is floating, and only the caftan is coquettish. ’

The caftan is Kong Yiji's last sustenance, but at the end of the Yue Opera, Kong Yiji took off this gown that was regarded as life and gave it to the female actor who could talk about Fengyue with him.

The actress asked, "Sir, you have left me this last one, so what else do you have?"

Kong Yiji replied, "A long shirt hangs on the remnants, and it is easy to return in the wind." ”

This is Mr. Shen Zhengjun's original manuscript "Kong Yiji", and finally Kong Yiji took off this long shirt, which is Mr. Shen, as a literati who was almost the same period as Kong Yiji, experienced the compromise after the changes of the times, and let go of his obsession.

But Mao Weitao changed the ending when he adapted it four years ago.

Finally, wearing a shabby robe like a flutter in the wind, Kong Yiji stood in the wine shop and smiled at the guests who laughed at him.

"I'll sing you a little song and change the pot of wine, okay?"

This belongs to Mao Weitao's own understanding of 'culture' and 'tradition', she does not have the literati style of Mr. Shen Zhengjun, but she has the flexibility of the 'cultural inheritor' of the new era.

It is precisely because of the final adaptation of this play that Wang Yao feels that this resonates with a series of directors such as "Big Names" or Feng Xiaogang and Zhang Yiyan.

Perfect for the occasion.

Reporter Zhu returned with a full load and left with Zhu Xiaoxia, and Wang Yao was interrupted by a visiting visitor before he could inform Mao Weitao to prepare for "Kong Yiji".

"Brother Xu, why do you have time to come here?" Wang Yao looked at Xu Shoucheng in military uniform in surprise.

"Xiao Yao, long time no see. Xu Shoucheng smiled and patted Wang Yao's shoulder, "Is Mr. Qigong here?"

"I'm still taking a nap, what's wrong?" asked Wang Yao.

"It's a little bit of a thing. Xu Shoucheng said with a smile, "Some time ago, a number of cultural relics were unearthed in Goryeo, including a movable type book with movable type printing, and then there was a little contradiction. ”

"Movable type printing?" Wang Yao raised his eyebrows slightly, "What contradiction can there be?"

"They advertised movable type printing in the media. There is also the invention of block printing, which originated in Goryeo and was inscribed on the World Heritage List by the United Nations. Xu Shoucheng said with a smile.

"What era is the movable type book?" asked Wang Yao with a frown.

"The 1377 one still works. Xu Shoucheng said with a smile.

"In 1377, when Bi Sheng invented movable type printing, it was around 1000 years ago, and it would not exceed 1100 years, and they were still vassals of the Northern Song Dynasty at that time. Wang Yao smiled dumbly, "Is your brain in water?"

"The academic community didn't promote it, but the media began to publicize it, and we didn't take it seriously, but when it came to the international community, the impact was too bad. Xu Shoucheng said with a smile.

"To be honest, the four major inventions were all made by foreigners in order to elevate themselves and belittle Huaxia, and they were guided by public opinion with political purposes, and we academics don't seem to take this seriously," Wang Yao smiled.

The concept of the world's four great inventions was put forward by the early English sinologist Joseph Needham, a famous biochemist and scientist in England, and at the same time had a peculiar plot for the mysterious China.

He wrote the book "Science and Civilization in China", which gave scholars from all over the world an impression of the backward New Dragon Kingdom after the war.

Among them, the four great inventions of ancient China, papermaking, the compass, gunpowder and printing, have been affirmed by most scholars, but in fact, Engels, Bacon, Maddox and other great people have expressed their approval.

But at the same time, it also set off the first round of the world's exploration and research of Chinese civilization, a large number of scholars from all over the world came to visit, and then when exploring the ancient Chinese civilization, they found the most terrible place of the Chinese nation, that is, the cohesion brought by the continuous inheritance of civilization.

And it is also commonly certified, Huaxia is an extremely intelligent race.

As a result, the 'Chinese civilization threat theory' has become prevalent in various countries, which has also indirectly caused the invasion of Western culture into China.

However, there are too many inventions in ancient China, and the four great inventions are known as great inventions that have changed the course of human beings and science and technology, which is a place to be proud of in the eyes of Chinese researchers, but not a place worth boasting about, because excessive praise and propaganda are suspected of being praised.

However, in order to establish the national confidence of the Chinese culture in the international status of the people at that time, it was still too much to talk about the four major inventions, but to be honest, this is not a particularly important thing in the academic world.

Moreover, the right to invent needs historical research, and the four major inventions have been recorded in the entire Chinese historical documents, and some cultural relics also exist, so it also confirms that China is indeed the earliest civilization to 'use' these things.

Chinese scholars modestly use 'use' instead of inventions, which is to express a kind of modesty, after all, these four major inventions are certified by the mainstream of the world.

And this time Goryeo so openly challenged the right to invent this invention, which really makes people laugh and cry.

Even China, a country with a 5,000-year-old civilization, did not dare to use the word 'invention', and they even wanted to apply for a patent, and they still publicized it in their country, which was a challenge to cultural authority, so Chinese scholars went to Goryeo to investigate this incident and found that it was indeed true.

What was unearthed is a Buddhist scripture, "Baiyun Monk Transcribed the Buddha Pointing to the Heart and Body Festival", it is indeed 1377, and it is also the only metal printing cultural relics unearthed at present, but it is indeed a bit ridiculous to snatch the invention right by virtue of this alone.

So the Chinese scholars and the Korean scholars began to study and discuss the matter, and wanted to solve it privately, which embarrassed everyone at that time, after all, the relationship between the two countries is okay now, but the Korean media hyped that 'printing was invented by Goryeo' and caused the people of their country to feel blindly following the trend.

Most importantly, the news reached Treasure Island.

A certain party in Baodao, which has always been known as provoking the authority of the mainland, has added fuel to the fire and spread this matter to Hong Kong and Dongying, and it has become more and more popular, and seeing that it is about to be introduced to the mainland, the state has finally taken it seriously and begun to prepare for a formal discussion of this matter.