Chapter 807: Why Does the U.S. Imperialist Always Want to Be the Enemy of China?
Why does US imperialism always want to be the enemy of China?
In fact, this problem is also a problem that Yang Weiping repeatedly studied in his previous life.
At that time, the economic ties between China and the United States were so close, the trade volume was so huge, and China bought so many U.S. Treasury bonds. In terms of economic interests, the United States should have no reason to openly become an enemy of China. As far as ideology is concerned, hundreds of millions of American fans in China worship the United States so much, and it should not be a reason for hostility.
I think that at the beginning, the US imperialists wanted to board the "Yinhe" and said that they would inspect it, and if they wanted to bomb the embassy in China, they would make the problem clear with a single bombing. Diaoyu Dao, the US imperialists say that if it is not Chinese, it is not Chinese, and if it is not allowed to use force against Japan, China will honestly do so.
In order to curry favor with the U.S. imperialists, he even invited the Oheima's family as guests to travel to China, which can be described as extremely respectful.
China has done this, why should the US imperialists openly regard China as their enemy?
In the final analysis, in fact, it is the material enjoyment brought about by reform and opening up that has made most Chinese people have no blood, no backbone, and no backbone, and they are afraid that the rich life that they have finally achieved will become nothing because of the war.
China has defeated the United States three times.
In the War of Liberation, the Kuomintang, the Party, and the Government supported by the United States fell into the hands of the Chinese Communist Party;
In the Korean War, the US-led multinational coalition was defeated by the Chinese Communist Party;
In the Vietnam War, the United States was also defeated by the Viet Cong, which was strongly supported by the Chinese Communist Party.
Therefore, as long as we carefully analyze the grievances and grievances between China and the United States, it is not difficult to see that US imperialism has always regarded China under the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party as a potential threat to US hegemony, and US imperialism has never changed its hostility toward the Chinese mainland from the beginning to the end.
No matter how hotly the Chinese people try to curry favor with the US imperialists, the US imperialists will not change their consistent strategic thinking. On the contrary, it will also make the US imperialists think that China is following the example of the ancients and hiding their guts.
The hostility of US imperialism towards China is not an ideological divergence at all. Ethnic contradictions and ethnic conflicts are the root causes!
Because the values of US imperialism are not freedom and democracy, but conquest and hegemony!
The reality is so cruel, people just want to be your enemy, do you still have to be a friend?
After the collapse of the Soviet Union, it seems that US imperialism is an enemy of China everywhere. But in fact, the biggest threat to US imperialism is Russia, led by Pu the Great, not China.
This is because Russia has enough weapons at the bottom of the box to level the United States! Although China also has quite a few nuclear warheads, the number of nuclear warheads is obviously not enough to level the United States.
Russia inherited more than 80 percent of the Soviet Union's military technology and weapons reserves, and its military strength is even stronger than that of the United States in some areas.
Do not think that for more than two decades after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the military power of US imperialism has been developing at a high speed. On the contrary, it was precisely because of the collapse of the Soviet Union that the United States had no real competitors, and then the development of its military technology slowed down.
Arguably. Whether it was the Soviet Union before the collapse or Russia after the collapse, the US imperialists were crushing this polar bear with money. He never dared to push the polar bears too militarily. Because the US imperialists are afraid that the Slavs will really be annoyed, and give them a fish to break the net!
Why is the lioness reluctant to provoke the bison, because it has a huge scar on its belly, because it has seen its own child die under the iron hooves of the bison, although it finally pounces on its opponent......
As a capitalist and imperialist country, US imperialism has always regarded the socialist camp as a thorn in its back, as if it had the ambition to destroy the imperial diet. Of course. The socialist camp also cherishes its hard-won political achievements and has always been in a wrangling with US imperialism.
However. It can be seen from the fact that the US imperialists sent troops to resolve the issue of the former Yugoslavia, sent troops to crusade against Afghanistan, sent troops to destroy the former Iraqi regime, sent troops to destroy the disobedient Gaddafi regime in Libya, and militarily deterred developing countries, and so on, it can be seen that US imperialism is not an ordinary "paper tiger", but a paper tiger made of space materials.
It can't be helpless with ordinary force, on the contrary, this paper tiger has an incomparably strong lethality against socialist countries. If you are not careful, any socialist country can become a wolf meal.
Of course. In the course of the confrontation between US imperialism and the socialist camp, US imperialism has not always been unscrupulous. In particular, when confronting the former Soviet coalition government, the United States has gone to great lengths but it is not easy to bargain. Especially during the Cold War, the two sides were basically evenly matched, and neither could control the enemy to death.
Don't look at Yang Weiping's bottom line that seems to be "unscrupulous" to provoke US imperialism. In fact, the string in Yang Weiping's heart has always collapsed tightly.
If it weren't for the Soviet Union, a polar bear, who continued to show its teeth and claws, Yang Weiping would never have started the Kra Canal project at this time.
Whether it is OUCC or Huaxia, it needs time for development now.
Fifteen years at most, as long as the Eastern Union and Huaxia have gone through the rapid development of the three five-year plans, even if the Soviet Union falls, Yang Weiping will have enough confidence to confront the paper tiger made of space materials of the US imperialists!
In view of the sustained and rapid economic development of OUC, it will inevitably compete directly or indirectly with US imperialism in the capital market, including the commodity market, the energy market, and so on, and the hegemonic ambition of US imperialism will definitely not be willing to give up.
In the course of the rise of the Eastern Union and China, sooner or later they will have to come into a head-on conflict with US imperialism! This is an objective law of existence that does not depend on any personal will.
The U.S. imperialists will never give up their position as global hegemon to the ancient and young Chinese Empire, which has 5,000 civilization inheritances!
Wait! The evil American emperor, in this life, I, Yang Weiping, must have revenge and revenge!
ā¦ā¦
The day before Yang Weiping left Moscow, Queen Elizabeth II and members of the royal family attended an impromptu meeting of the British Ceremony and delivered a speech.
Elizabeth II said that the British government looks forward to strengthening the cooperative relationship with OUEC.
The British royal family then issued a statement saying that although Baron John Young gave up the lifelong noble baronial title of the British royal family after serving as the head of state of the Eastern Union, the royal family will always retain Sir Yang's honorary knighthood, and also set up a special room for Sir Yang in Buckingham Palace, where Yang Weiping stayed at Buckingham Palace after arriving in London.
On November 17, 1985, Yang Weiping and his wife arrived in London, the capital of the United Kingdom.
Three years ago, former North Burmese President Yeo Ka Sing visited the United Kingdom at the invitation of the British royal family, and also had a meeting with Queen Elizabeth II.
At that time, as Yang Weiping's microphone, Yang Jiasheng made it clear at the press conference at Buckingham Palace: "During my visit to the UK, the two sides issued a joint statement and decided to establish a comprehensive strategic partnership between Myanmar and the UK, and we also identified the key areas of cooperation between the two sides in the future. ā
After that, Yang Jiasheng briefed the British media and reporters on the economic development of North Burma and the shape of North Myanmar, and said that Myanmar-UK relations have entered a new stage.
After the merger of North and South Myanmar to form the Federal Republic of Donghui, this was also the first visit to the United Kingdom by a leader of the Eastern Union countries.
For Yang Weiping, it is certainly not the first time he has come to the UK.
In a certain sense, the friendly relationship between Yang Weiping and the British government and the British royal family is not much worse than that between Yang Weiping and Huaxia.
Whether it is the Tiangong Group, or the Tiangong Shi YĆ n Room, including the later Northern Burma, and now the Eastern Union, they are all inextricably linked with the British royal family and the British government.
Of course, this has a lot to do with the fact that the British royal family and the British government have always wanted to integrate the development of North Burma into the Commonwealth system.
In other words, it is basically impossible for any other person in this world to get rid of British control after receiving so many benefits from the British. However, the British Empire was unlucky, and met Sir Yang, a once-in-a-lifetime "son of God", and all the plans of the British Empire turned into a bamboo basket to draw water.
Yang Weiping knew early on that Britain had long sought to use what was then Northern Burma as a bridgehead for its re-entry into the Far East and the Asia-Pacific region.
Regarding John Niu's wishful thinking, Yang Weiping's countermeasure is, of course, to borrow chickens to lay eggs and take advantage of the trend. Otherwise, if Britain had not supported North Burma in the international community, US imperialism would not have allowed North Burma to have a stable period of peaceful development.
The British could not calculate that Yang Weiping's Northern Burma could quickly develop into a new generation of Asian power with economic strength even exceeding that of the British Empire in just eight years.
And what makes Britain feel most helpless is that this new country is not only economically strong, but also militarily powerful.
If it had not been for the Falklands War, the British government might have considered using warships and artillery to show Yang Weiping the prestige of the British Empire, as in the Second Opium War.
It's a pity that in the Malvinas Islands, the British Empire can't even pack up a third-rate country like Argentina, and if it faces North Burma, which is stronger than Argentina in the navy, land and air forces at the same time, Britain will definitely become the most laughing stock in the world.
In desperation, in order to protect British interests in Northern Burma, the John Bulls had to once again sacrifice the magic weapon of the Jing Proper Policy, and go all out to strengthen the friendship with Sir Young.
Yang Weiping still remembers that three years ago, Husfield came to Mandalay to find him, and there was no need for Yang Weiping to marry the Yang Tusi family in northern Myanmar, and a direct marriage with the British royal family was the most in line with the interests of Yang Weiping and Northern Burma. As a result, he was naturally rejected by Yang Weiping.
Just kidding, marrying the British royal family, wouldn't it be true that the Eastern Union is taking the "evil road" of capitalism + imperialism!
The Eastern Union and the British Empire can be diplomatic friends, but they must not develop friendships into kinship.
Since Margaret Thatcher, the Iron Lady, had the ambition to revive the empire on which the sun never sets, Yang Weiping did not mind helping her appropriately.
Because, the re-emergence of the British Empire in Europe must come at the expense of the interests of American imperialism in Europe and Africa. (To be continued......)