In the face of MGM's "Huang Shiren" aggressive debt coercion, "Yang Bailao" Disney did not choose to repay the debt, let alone choose to escape! After all, Disney could not hide from this losing bet, and everyone was watching it,.。

If Disney lost to MGM in this "Lion King War", only losing its position as the king of animated films, then once Michael Eisner and Disney choose to repay the debt, then Disney will lose or even bury its nearly 100-year foundation.

Therefore, even Disney's "tyrant" Michael Eisner can only obediently pinch his nose and carry this matter, perhaps with a calm attitude to solve the matter, there is still a little chance of saving Disney's lost face.

So, in the hustle and bustle of the media who are not afraid of big things, in the fierce and aggressive momentum of Peter Chernin and Shirley Lansing, in the face of the menacing MGM - Disney finally responded.

Michael Eisner, the chairman of Disney, finally accepted an interview after being silent for N days, and responded positively to all the things about the "Lion King" bet.

"We at Disney are willing to pay all the price for our underestimated enemies, we are willing to gamble and lose, and Disney will abide by the agreements and agreements signed with MGM. Therefore, please rest assured that we will complete the transfer and handover of the copyright and the film and television adaptation rights of the pirate theme park with MGM as soon as possible. ”

This is Michael Eisner's formal commitment to Disney to show his generosity as much as possible, after all, this is about Disney's reputation and fame in the future.

Obviously, Michael Eisner and Disney did not have the brains to choose to be "old friends" to repay their debts, and to be honest, they did not dare to choose to repay their debts - the foundation of Diss for nearly a hundred years cannot be destroyed in the hands of their generation.

Now that the reputation has been brushed up and the money machine is running normally, MGM naturally wants to "break the donkey" and complete this matter with Disney as soon as possible, so as not to have too many dreams at night.

Soon, MGM and Disney agreed on the time and details of the "bet" delivery, and then it was time to see the real thing.

Therefore, under the witness of a third-party notary, Peter Chening and Shirley Lansing represented MGM, and Michael Eisner and Roy Disney represented Disney, and the two parties officially completed the transfer of all copyrights.

Taking over the rights to Disney's animated film from Roy Disney, a member of the Disney family, Peter Chernin and Shirley Lansing both felt a little weird in their hearts, but when they tasted it, it was really cool.

Compared with Peter Chenin and Shirley Lansing, who are quite good-looking, Michael Eisner and Roy Disney, the "Disney duo", obviously have a bad face. However, in this regard, Peter Chernin and Shirley Lansing said that they quite understand, after all, they are losers, especially Roy Disney, who is the "unscrupulous descendant" of the Disney family.

But what's the matter, anyway, this "Lion King War" bet finally came to a perfect end, and MGM crushed Disney without any objections and obtained the "spoils" he won.

Subsequently, in response to this matter,、、、 ABC and CBS and other media outlets, under the bewildered gaze of everyone, praised Michael Eisner and Disney for being trustworthy and rhythmic. Anyway, how good these media are to say it, they almost praised Michael Eisner and Disney, the "losers".

For a while, Hollywood and the whole United States were a little confused, Nima, this style of painting is obviously a little wrong, right?

Who doesn't know that these media outlets led by MGM are all MGM's "allies", but now they are praising Disney and Michael Eisner. If so, if those Disney "comrades-in-arms" say this, that's normal, but what do these people mean?

Is it a killing?

However, no matter what others say, several media outlets continue to praise Michael Eisner's great contribution to Disney, and even call him the second only "super leader" in Disney history.

In several media reports, the reason why Disney's fiasco was defeated by MGM was not Michael Eisner, but the person in charge.

Hehe, so who is in charge of Disney's this?

Don't even ask, it's the famous "ghost talent" Katzenberg.

Yes, several media outlets put the reason for Disney's loss of the bet directly on Katzenberg, and Michael Eisner was completely chosen - as if the whole thing had nothing to do with him.

In this case, the "clear-eyed person" can see it at a glance - this Nima is completely the "media water army" invited by Michael Eisner to wash his name, no way, this routine is too obvious.

However, you have to say that these media outlets dragged Katzenberg down this pool of sewage, absolutely completely black. Quite simply, this "Lion King War" arose because of Katzenberg's "big mouth", and moreover, it was Katzenberg himself.

So, now that Disney has lost the "Lion King" bet, Katzenberg's responsibility is absolutely impossible to run away - but he is only a secondary responsibility.

Michael Eisner, the chairman, should bear the main responsibility, not to mention, this "Lion King's War" bet contract was signed by him and Frank Wells and MGM. Now that Frank Wells has died in a helicopter crash, Michael Eisner is forced to bear this "primary responsibility".

However, the media did not mention Michael Eisner's responsibility in this matter, and sang praises for him, as if the matter really had nothing to do with him. Compared with Michael Eisner's "good treatment", Katzenberg is much worse, in these media writings, he is the culprit of the defeat of this battle, and almost has become Disney's "sinner through the ages".

However, it is obvious that these unscrupulous media have deceived the ordinary "melon-eating masses", with a rhythm, as for insiders, it can be seen at a glance - the main reason why Disney lost the "Lion King War" is not Katzenberg at all, but Michael Eisner, the chairman.

Therefore, in the eyes of "insiders", the media's one-sided and large-scale attack on Katzenberg must have been instigated by Michael Eisner, just to wash away his own mistakes.

Hehe, but is that really the case?

In fact, this is completely a "routine", and it is an insidious "routine......