Of course, that netizen had no intention of questioning whether Ai Qing had ulterior motives, he meant that it was good to help others, but doing good deeds without leaving a name is usually another possibility. Pen | fun | pavilion www. ｂｉｑｕｇｅ。 ｉｎｆｏ

This netizen's logic is slightly complicated and needs to be carefully analyzed.

This netizen believes that from the perspective of interests, anyone should do anything for their own interests.

However, benefits do not necessarily mean only money, but also other things, such as honor.

But one thing doesn't make sense, that is, there are really people who "do good deeds without leaving a name" in reality!

It can be seen that not all people are "selfish", and there are always exceptions.

However, what that netizen means is that those who "do good deeds without leaving a name" are actually "selfish".

Because they are obviously much smarter than people who "do good deeds and leave a name".

For example, if a person has done three good deeds and left his name all three times, this will naturally be recognized by everyone, but the recognition is not too high.

But the other man did three good things, all of which were left unnamed. The first two good things are known to no one, but the third good thing is known "by accident". Then the social recognition of this person is far greater than that of the previous person who left his name again and again.

Lin Lei is noncommittal about this logic.

Because this kind of thing is really unclear, and I'm afraid that the logic of that netizen will at least hit the "majority" of people who do good deeds without leaving their names.

Back to Ai Qing.

Ai Qing has an important identity, that is, the head of the dormitory.

Maybe in college dorms these days, the head of the dormitory is a chore - not necessarily, every place is different.

However, twenty years ago, the head of the dormitory was also an official.

This shows that Ai Qing is very "self-motivated".

So Ai Qing helps a five-guarantee household, such as helping the five-guarantee household to do housework, etc., that is reasonable. Because of doing this kind of thing, it is obviously much better to "leave a name" than "leave a name", and there is no doubt that in the end, Ai Qing's behavior will definitely be known by the school.

The netizen analyzed that when Ai Qing was doing housework in the Wubao household, there might be a stupid son in the Wubao household, or a disabled person who had a temporary intention and intended to rape, but when Ai Qing resisted, he accidentally killed Ai Qing.

At this time, the elders of the Wubao household saw that the matter had come to this point, and they could only help their relatives to evade responsibility, and finally complete the process of dismembering the corpse and throwing the corpse.

The general reasoning process of the "Five Guarantee Household Theory" is like this, and logically speaking, there is also a certain amount of truth.

First of all, the perpetrator has a difficult life, simply put, he has no money.

This is more in line with the facts of the case, because the most critical point in this case is the plot of 2,000 pieces of corpses.

What kind of criminal will break 2,000 pieces of corpse after murder?

Some say that this seems to mean that the murderer has an unforgettable hatred for the victim, and he has to cut her with a thousand knives - the equivalent of Ling Chi in ancient times.

This statement, Lin Lei thinks it is very unreliable, at least the probability is extremely low.

Because the people who eat melons are always willing to believe in all kinds of "whimsical ideas" that they are willing to believe, in fact, the possibility is almost zero.

We know that, not to mention far away, only when it comes to murder cases after the founding of the People's Republic of China, vendetta and love killings account for more than half of the proportion.

In every case here, whether it is love or hatred, how many cases are more than 2,000 pieces of corpses?

The answer is 0.

The Dongda corpse shredding case is the only case in which more than 2,000 corpses are broken.

Can you say that the hatred of all murderers for the dead after the founding of the People's Republic of China is not as great as the hatred of the murderers for Ai Qing in the Dongda corpse crushing case?

Lin Lei believes that anyone who has a little logical thinking ability will definitely not think so.

Ai Qing is just a little girl from a rural area who has just entered college, how much resentment can she have in a place that has just arrived?

Of course, there are no absolutes in the world, Lin Lei just thinks that this case is broken into 2,000 pieces of corpses because of hatred, which is extremely unlikely.

Now back to the question just now, what kind of criminal will break up 2,000 pieces of corpse after killing someone?

Breaking up 2,000 pieces of corpse is definitely a time-consuming and laborious task, and it takes a long time and is extremely risky.

If the body is being dismembered, and the "water meter is checked" - well, no, if there is any accident, then the murderer is properly "dead".

To do this kind of thing, a more reasonable explanation is to facilitate the disposal of corpses.

The murderer obviously did not have a car or a quick means of transportation such as a motorcycle, otherwise it would be very easy to throw the body, and there was no need to break it into such small pieces at all.

Then it can naturally be deduced that the murderer's life is relatively difficult, and the logical root of the crime committed by the "five guarantee households" comes from this.

Secondly, regarding the motive for the crime, the netizen analyzed that the most likely thing is "rape and murder", that is, because of "lust".

It is true that Ai Qing looks ordinary, but the perpetrator's family conditions are also very poor, and it is very likely that he is mentally challenged or disabled, so he is even more "hungry" in that regard.

Female college students, young, even if they are average in appearance, are very attractive to men from five-guarantee families.

From the day the "Five Guarantees" crime was raised, it aroused great repercussions in society.

Many people who eat melons are convinced, thinking that the truth must be like this.

Even that netizen sent materials to the Dongfang City Public Security Bureau, explaining his reasoning process in detail.

But—

The Dongfang City Public Security Bureau chose to remain silent and did not express any relevant opinions.

Lin Lei glanced at Li Xiaoan and Gu Li, and said lightly: "Xiao An, Gu Li, you have been with me for a long time, and you have also seen with your own eyes how I solved the case." Tell me, what's the difference between me and the others?"

Li Xiaoan and Gu Li were stunned for a moment, and the two glanced at each other, not knowing how to pick up this conversation.

Lu Yun unveiled the answer on the side: "The biggest difference between Lin Lei and others is actually that there are too many people in this world who are similar to Wise and Bright. ”

Previously, when he was in the book, Wise Glory continuously threw out the mystery of reasoning, which was also reasonable.

But what is lacking in the brilliance of wisdom is evidence.

Or uniqueness, which can also be called exclusivity.

There are often countless possibilities for a case before the truth is revealed.

Many people deduce a possibility and are ecstatic, feeling that the truth of the case must be what they think.

However, Lin Lei is different.

"The biggest problem with the murder theory is that there is no evidence, and this is just one of the countless possibilities in the case. Many people can come up with reasoning, but it is not easy to make one's reasoning the only truth. Lin Lei squinted his eyes slightly and said slowly.