"What's going on...... Homer nervously flipped through his notebook, "the words are so messy that I can't even recognize them myself!"

"It must have something to do with GAY, right? Don't you hate him for using his identity to speak?"

“GAY…… GAY…… Oh yes, yes!" Homer snapped his head, "yes, yes, yes, okay, I see." Pen Fun Pavilion wWw. ｂiquge。 ｉｎfo”

“……”

"There's no way, everyone is nervous about the finals. ”

"It's because I didn't go to the toilet!"

After reading the advertisement, Homer continued to speak.

"What is it?" said Homer, staring at the pea, word by word, "is what you interpret as [hate]." ”

"You say, I hate you because it's different, because I'm different from you, so I hate you. ”

"Then have you ever heard of a sentence-" Homer said and made a gesture of invitation to Ziya, "Mr. Ziya, please." ”

"Hmph. Ziya said generously, "[The gentleman is harmonious but different, and the villain is the same but not harmonious!]"

"Yes, that's it. "Between gentlemen, even if everyone's positions and views are very different, they can still be inclusive, and even if everyone is exactly the same, villains are still full of contradictions and hate." ”

"Do we like Europeans and Americans who are different from us more, but we hate Japanese and Korean people who are more similar to us?"

"Do we like Xiao Han who is full of different romanticism more, but we are more disgusted with Guo Si, who is also a money worshipper with ourselves?"

"Do we like Li Yan who has three views more, but we hate Han Fan who is as eager as we are for nothing?"

"You cite examples of wealth and poverty, beliefs, and sexual orientation, and I can also counter them with race, art, and idol preferences. ”

"'Different' is not a reason for [I hate] at all, it is just to lead to the prelude to your next dance move, you can play better pea, but you still compromise in the end, or decide to use your own experience to stir up emotions, if you have a chance to speak later, I hope you throw away the burden of 'identity', you can do better pea." ”

Pea's expression was mixed, and he didn't know whether to approve or shake his head.

Homer continued: "Then why does Pea have to use the reason of 'different' to interpret [I hate]? Because he wants to package 'black' as brainless, narrow, and stupid as possible, so that it is convenient to interpret 'black' as a brainless troll, which is a very normal technique in debate, squeezing the opponent's position. ”

"Mr. Ziya, on the other hand, is expanding his position, trying to interpret 'black' as 'criticism', and trying to package 'black' as noble, wise and level as possible. ”

"The reason why Mr. Hu Dagang suggested just now that he should stop characterizing [I hate] is because he saw this, in fact, the previous debate was all about pulling the spring. Homer said, "The mom team wants to make the 'black' lowly, and the dad team wants to make the 'black' noble, so it makes no sense to pull it around, that is, who performs better than whom, who can bring emotions more, the audience will believe more in the interpretation of 'black', the syllabus teacher does not want to see this situation, and wants us to jump out of this tug-of-war and create a new angle." ”

"Actually, we have one of the simplest angles - freedom of speech. Everyone has the freedom to speak, both positively and negatively. I haven't watched "Little Four Generations", but I just hate it, that is, I want to say, freedom of speech, why don't you let me say it?"

"This angle is actually unassailable, but it has a drawback, it is too ordinary, and everyone wants to get it, which leads to very little persuasiveness, and there is also a little trouble, as far as the scale of freedom of speech, we will inevitably pull the spring again. ”

"So we had to look at it in a different dimension. Before, both of us were ascending to the dimension and wanted to give more definitions to this topic, but now I will descend the dimension, remove those irrelevant definitions, and return to the essence. ”

Homer said slowly: "I hack the star I hate...... This...... Does this need a reason?"

"What does it matter if I'm a high-level critic or a brainless troll?"

"Are we going to establish a 'Black Star Language Specification'? are we going to organize a certification exam that only allows strong blacks like Mr. Ziya whose knowledge and wisdom have been certified, and prohibits people who are not good enough to speak?"

"Or you say that black with the premise of [harm] should not be black, and black with the premise of [criticism and guidance] can be black, then how should we define the difference between [harm] and [criticism]?"

"Even if we can define it, then do we have to define each star themselves? After all, the scale of each star is different, some people think, 'You're so pretending to beep!' This kind of thing is a compliment, some people think it's an insult, some people are willing to accept criticism of themselves, and some people feel hurt when they hear any criticism. ”

"I'll give you an example on the spot, and I don't mean anything else, it's purely a technical example. Homer said and looked at Pea, "You said 'dead pervert' that you can't do this, it's hurt, then I'll change my words-"

"Homosexuality is not conducive to the growth of our population and the long-term development of society, but also affects the unity of the masses and the establishment of universal values, you should find a way to change yourself and become a more beneficial person to society. 】”

"So, it's reasonable, it's level, do you accept it? Do you want to change?"

"This is obviously more hurtful than a sentence of 'dead pervert', right?"

"To be honest, you just want to hear a sentence - [Doudou you are the best, keep being yourself!], right?"

"So whether it's [I hate], [black], or [hurt], [criticism], the scale of each of these things is completely uncontrollable, there are as many people as there are, there are as many scales, you try to define a scale for each concept, trying to put pressure on people from the aspect of social morality, suggesting that people 'want to be black' or 'don't want to be black', but this scale of public morality itself is not operable and meaningless. ”

"Let's go back to the essence of everything and look at the debate without those definitions and yardsticks. ”

"To be black is to release one's nature and be reckless of the consequences, and not to be dark is to suppress one's nature and consider the consequences. ”

"So see clearly, what we end up arguing about is not what is called 'black', but the good and bad consequences, I do the good and I don't do the bad, it's as simple as that. ”

"In the end, the debate is from a first-person point of view, it is the 'me', and what we have to judge is whether the consequences for the 'me' are good or bad, not the whole society, all mankind, we don't have to think about it so much. ”

"If 'black' a star can bring me good consequences, make me happy, liberate, release, point out problems, correct the atmosphere, in short, in the end, it will be beneficial to me, then it is very clear, to be black. ”

"If, on the contrary, 'hacking' a star brings me bad consequences, it will make me arrested, beaten, expelled, unhappy, this is the bad consequence, then don't be black. ”

"In reality, 'black' is not illegal, and we cannot define the moral scale of 'black', and for the vast majority of people, 'black' can at least bring emotional release and is a good consequence. As for the bad consequences, only a few exceptions or stakeholders will suffer. ”

"So, for the vast majority of people, I can't find a reason to 'not be black'. ”

Pea finally asked the sunspots, can you improve your life? ”

Homer waved his big arm like a pea: "No! But cool!"