I'm writing a new chapter, and I'm enduring the pain in my fingers.

Suddenly, I was shocked to hear that someone in a niche forum was fighting for my latest chapter.

The original words of the poster are-Mayes, a person who advocates brainless powder is a normal way of life, and it is also worthy of using the holy way. Even if you wash the floor of the spiritual Taijun, you actually distort the revolutionary aspirants to shed their blood for the nation-state, and work together to fight for the brainless fans.

Then many people followed the post and said "go report", which was very enthusiastic.

I'm definitely not afraid to report it, everyone is used to it, isn't it?

That's what makes me very uncomfortable.

I don't know where this guy came to the conclusion that I washed the ground for the spiritual Taijun, and that I distorted the martyrs into brainless fans.

I'm confused.

followed by such a positive idea, it can be distorted like this.

I haven't read the chapter for a long time, I deliberately opened the chapter to see what everyone thinks, is it that I have something unclear about the expression, and I didn't find a similar statement.

However, I saw a very bad comment.

From a reader who has been following the book and is a little familiar, Yuyu Friend.

"Self-righteous," he said. It can be so eloquent. It's good that I don't know people, I don't know faces, and I don't know my heart, otherwise I would be really sad. The writing is really good, I don't like to read, I can't write such a book without checking a lot of information, although I never believe that there are perfect people, I still think it's a pity"

It was completely incomprehensible for a while.

I deliberately went back to the comments to find the chapter and said, and finally figured out that the feelings were because I hacked Mr. Gongsun.

It's a bit ridiculous, "Little Pink" thinks I wash the floor for Luo, but book friends think I'm brainless and black.

After writing a book for so long, I think I am basically defensible in details, and I am not familiar with things, I must first consult a lot of information before writing, even if it is just a sentence or a noun that you will definitely pass by.

What I am familiar with, I will expand.

About Luo's matter, right, let history comment, in the Internet era, the traces left by a celebrity will not dissipate, nor can they be faked.

Suffice it to say that I am absolutely correct in my attitude.

Fang Xiaowu's first Weibo, do you remember?

[Contemporary consumption is mainly presented as a symbolic activity, that is, people express their social identity more through the cultural significance contained in consumption, deconstruct all the values in it, and elaborate their own cultural aesthetics and tastes. It's trendy and trendy, but a lot of people can't tell the difference between deconstruction and over-interpretation, so they often consume what shouldn't be consumed, and that's bad – I mean...... Wishing World Peace]

This short exposition is my deepest insight.

It is still very relevant to today's affairs.

Position, side, interpretation, consumption, rumors, value orientation, aesthetic taste......

I want to say a lot, it's all in this passage.

Today is another unwarranted disaster, I can't laugh or cry, I try my best to write the next chapter, but don't wait.

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is .. Mobile version reading URL: m.