Chapter 851

The charity dinner has begun, Song Zheng looked at Han Hong on the stage and was talking about the theme of the dinner, Han Hong's charity dinner will be held every year, but the theme is different every year, she has never done charity only to help a certain type of people in need, but to see who needs help, with what the theme.

This time, the theme is helping sanitation workers.

In fact, the charity theme of this time has started yesterday, Han Hong also took a group of celebrities to clean the streets before dawn, and originally planned to invite Lin Xinru to go with him, but Song Zheng didn't let it, now the weather has turned cold, and in the early hours of the morning, the outdoor temperature is only a few degrees, and he is reluctant to let his daughter-in-law suffer that hardship.

This can't be said that Song Zheng has no love, the sanitation workers work hard in the wind and snow for the cleaning of the city, but shouldn't their daughter-in-law hurt?

Does it have to be in the middle of the night, frozen and sifting up and down the chaff to go out and sweep the streets to be a truly caring and socially responsible person?

Isn't that?

Of course, Song Zheng will not stand on the opposing side of Han Hong's approach, Han Hong has always been high-profile in doing charity, just to call on more people to participate.

On the stage, Han Hong said sensationally, and invited a few sanitation workers to come to the stage to say that Song Zheng naturally had nothing to say about helping these ordinary people living at the bottom of the society, but some people around him kept looking at him, which made him feel very uncomfortable, and Song Zheng could even read accurate information from the eyes of those people.

He's so rich, look at how much he donates?

I can't lose to him, I must donate more than him, and steal the limelight.

For these people, Song Zheng is really speechless, he doesn't know when it started, a charity event, which was supposed to be a heart-warming event, became more and more like a show.

As the elite of the society, the high-income people of the society, while achieving fame, it is indeed appropriate to repay the society and do some charity, but in the face of charity, the amount of celebrity donations, donate or not, it is often easy for people to pay great attention to one thing.

Some people say that celebrities' high income is earned by themselves, and charitable donations are not the business of celebrities, donating is a good thing, and not donating is also the celebrity's own choice, and celebrities have the right to choose the use of their own property.

In addition, there are some people's views that celebrities, as a profession with a high income to the outrageous level in society, should have at least public obligations as public figures.

In Song Zheng's view, charity Haval in the heart, should not be measured by the amount of donations at all, simple kindness has nothing to do with the amount, donate a dollar and donate more people are the same kindness, not to mention love as a game, I feel that who donates more now is the winner, don't let the love deteriorate, do it from the heart, it is more valuable.

But there are some keyboard warriors who have to engage in some moral kidnapping, donating money = showmanship, not donating = indifference, announcing = hype, not announcing = not donating, donating too much = showing off, donating less = stingy, explaining = whitewashing, silence = weak heart.

This bizarre theory seems ridiculous, but this black humor also breaks the strange circle that celebrity donation activities fall into, but it is not the celebrities who should be embarrassed, but the charity environment that lacks integrity and transparency.

The "Guo incident" has caused people to lose trust in the Red Cross, and this suspicion has now spread to almost every aspect of philanthropy.

When a certain actress posted a screenshot of the donation webpage, countless netizens stared at the address bar, the address that pointed to the local file, and the abuse did not stop until the police refuted the rumors.

After experiencing the celebrity charity turmoil such as the "fraudulent donation gate" of the international chapter, people are used to questioning and asking questions about every unclear detail, which is not a bad thing, but the ability to think, judge and correct mistakes is more important.

Before that, the most urgent thing is to regulate charity activities, so that the good deeds of celebrities can be transparent and become a common thing.

It should be affirmed that there are not a few celebrities with a sense of social responsibility, and donations should be consciously voluntary, creating public opinion to "force donations" and "kidnapping" can only hurt love, and the numbers donated are not all of charity.

Regarding the views on charitable donations and celebrity artists' donations, some people donate generously, which will show that some people are too "stingy", and everyone often thinks about this matter?

First of all, as long as it is a public figure, whether it is an entrepreneur, a philanthropist, or a star, whether it is a first-line or an eighteenth-tier person, no matter what profession, how to become popular, as long as it is a public figure, has a certain reputation and is well-known, then participating in public welfare and charity activities, the "charity red and black list" of artists sorted out by the masses will not be missed.

Whenever there is a charity activity, the masses will spontaneously become "messengers of justice", using personal values and from a self-perceived objective point of view, to dig deep into the amount of donations from celebrities to define who is really a good character, and to spread this red and black list of good character.

The masses don't think there is any problem with their own approach, maybe the subtext in the hearts of the masses is: I'm just an ordinary little person, besides, what I do is just my personal behavior, I'm just curious to have a good time, by the way, see who donates how much, see who is really generous and generous A good artist with both virtue and art, who is a stingy "hypocrite", and even thinks that this kind of personal behavior can also help the disadvantaged groups speak out from other perspectives, which is a manifestation of justice?

In fact, it is normal for the public to discuss one thing, and this kind of charity and public welfare activities are originally good things to do good deeds, not bad things, and can follow the concept and influence the public from the perspective of stars, which is the fundamental purpose of this kind of charity gala.

Another important point is that the masses understand things, but after knowing the amount of money that no one has donated, they begin to derive related topics through this topic, and use the amount of donations as the basis for measuring everything as the talking point. ”

Facts and truth are not the most important thing in the eyes of the masses, just look at the string of numbers to deduct hats, labels, set people, knock on the keyboard a few times, and deny others without much effort!

For this kind of person, I really want to ask, if you really look at the number of donations to judge character and morality, then how many numbers are passing, how many numbers are excellent, who has the final say on this standard?

Of course, ordinary people have the right to know, but isn't it too hasty and irresponsible to use this way to rashly define a person's morality and character after understanding one-sided information?

Because he is just an ordinary person, he thinks that it is as simple as just talking about individuals every day, and he has never considered how great the power of the masses is, and the mentality of the masses may be: relying on this little wind can not set off any big waves!

As everyone knows, everyone thinks like this, just like a drop of water is nothing, but isn't the sea formed by this drop of water?

Although public figures are highly paid, but that is also the ability of others, he can't earn this money without ability, people don't steal, don't rob, don't break the law of labor income, it's not too much to say that it's hard money, what do you want to do with your income, how much you want to donate, how to donate, there are always people who want to use their personal values to point fingers, judge, and take it for granted.

For example, if a person has an income of 100,000 yuan, and his family expenses are 30,000 yuan, and there are 70,000 yuan left, at this time, if the person's industry organizes a public welfare charity activity in the industry, how much will this person donate?

Who would want someone else to define a child's character by this donation amount?

Who thinks that their good deeds can represent anything and mean anything at this time?

If there are 70,000 yuan left, donate 20,000 yuan, and others say that this person's salary has been paid by 10, don't think that I don't know, I really cut the door, so I donated so much, then in the case of 70,000 yuan, donate 65,000, others will say that this person is a good person? Can you change to say that this person is really a caring and generous good person? If this is really the case, isn't it an arena in the name of charity to win people's hearts and win praise?

Public welfare and charity must be a good thing, but if you can't donate more money, you are an artist with both virtue and art, and if you donate less money, you are a ghost with poor moral character, right?

If you can't find the details of the donations, you will say that there is an unsightly inside story, and it must be too little to be published, and if people don't have the details this time, they just have no love?

As far as Song Zheng knows, there are many celebrities who have been kidnapped by morality and have been forced to donate, such as Wu Jing, who had no friends with a "Wolf Warrior 2" in his previous life, "Wolf Warrior 2" was a big hit, and the box office soared all the way, becoming the box office champion of Chinese films, after the Jiuzhai Gou earthquake, Wu Jing donated 1 million at the first time, which was originally a good deed and a righteous act, but some people came out and actually accused him, saying "Wolf Warrior 2" The box office is so high, only one million was donated, it's really picky, and there are even more unpleasant words.

These people are really geniuses, people pay their own money and donate, what does it matter to you, they even take out the box office to talk about things, how many hundreds of millions of box office, Wu Jing can receive all of them?

There is also Xiangjiang Liu Tianwang, the strongest of the four heavenly kings, when the Wenchuan earthquake, he first donated 100,000 yuan after hearing the news, so netizens started again, saying that 100,000 dare to take out a shame, but as everyone knows, Andy silently donated a lot of money after that, according to insiders, Liu Tianwang donated about 50 million alone, but Andy never came out to say anything.

and Qiao Renliang, after the explosion of a Hong Kong University, he was criticized by netizens for saying the wrong thing, and later he apologized and donated 1 million, but netizens said that he was forced to donate money under pressure, and then he also left, because of depression, I don't know if the person who scolded him at the beginning had a trace of turmoil in his heart.

and Zhao Liying, who has now become a Xiaohuadan under the 1+1 company, after becoming popular in her previous life, she donated money to her hometown to repair roads, but she was said by her fellow villagers that the donation was too little, who is this TM.

This kind of keyboard warriors, mouth cannons, geniuses who are good at kidnapping celebrities with so-called morality, when they are forced to donate, what supports them is nothing more than a psychology that can be almost distorted.

Your money is earned by everyone, so if you donate, you donate the same as my donation.

For example, Wu Jing, who was forced to donate in his previous life, those who forced him to donate the idea: I once went to the cinema to watch "Wolf Warrior 2", so Wu Jing has my share of the money he earns.

It seems that there is no problem with logic, but then there is the robber logic: you earn my money, so I can ask for the disposal of this money as "God", so if you donate, I donate.

Isn't this robber logic?

Song Zheng is not the only star who has been "forced to donate", similar phenomena often occur, and a deformed moral kidnapping logic is reflected behind the forced donation.

On a personal level, it is commendable for everyone to pursue moral improvement, such as self-reflection and helping others.

But not everyone can expect others to pursue virtue as they do, because this involves not only a different understanding of morality, but also the extension of morality from individual self-improvement to behavioral guidance between groups.

Moral kidnapping is the imposition of one's own moral standards on others as a basis for accusation or coercion. Put yourself on the moral high ground and accuse others of not doing something is immoral, such as saying that celebrities lack virtue if they don't donate money, or simply put the other party on the moral high ground and accuse others of not doing something is hypocrisy, such as saying that if you don't donate money, you don't deserve to be a social elite.

There is a word on the Internet to describe this kind of person, called moral, or virgin, originally helping others is a virtue that everyone advocates, but I don't know when it began, it was turned into some weapons that stood on the moral high ground to kidnap others, the difference between the Virgin and the virgin is probably to see others suffering, Our Lady will say: "They are so pitiful, I must sacrifice myself to help them." ”

And the will say, "They are so pitiful, why don't you sacrifice yourselves to help them?"

In fact, whether it is a local tyrant, a celebrity, or a poor person, everyone's money is also earned by their own efforts, others help you with love, not to help is your duty, helping others is a good quality, but it is not a weapon to kidnap others, seeing others in trouble, it is a good thing to want to help, but it is not advisable to kidnap others.

Originally, public welfare should be a low-key thing, it is something that can be done in life, to put it clearly, many things depend on whether public figures want to show ordinary people, those photos that look at it and say that they are secretly taken, in fact, they are all designed to pose for photos, and people are not happy to see it?

People have a pseudo no-makeup photo, and ordinary people can grind five layers of skin to look a little more compatible, just for these things, they still take their own time and brain cells to do all kinds of speculation about others and define others, is it really good?

In many cases, many things really cannot be measured by money, and a murderer who often does public welfare can ignore the fact that he has killed people as long as he is particularly generous every time he does charity?

Don't say it's okay, it's okay, it's okay if you don't donate, there's nothing to force to do this kind of thing.

As a result, when I saw that I really didn't donate, I started to say again, you have a big heart, you are really unloving, you are really wrong.

Since childhood, the teacher has taught, don't take kindness as small, charity is a habit, but also an attitude, what attitude everyone intends to use to do this thing can be completely free, why do people always come out moral kidnapping?

When talking about others, you should think about yourself first, if you are forced to donate in this kind of thing, will you choose to compromise?

Also, if your relative is seriously ill and needs crowdfunding, how much money will you contribute to help him?

I don't know how much is the most appropriate, so don't restrain others, ask others, kidnap others, and use the donation amount to define others' character and public morality afterwards.

Don't make charity and public welfare into an arena, forcing donations can be regarded as positive energy?

How much have you done for charity, and have you ever done public welfare?

On what basis do you order others to ask for how much they give?

Don't do the kind of thing that you don't do anything, and criticize others but are the first to talk about it.

No matter how much others contribute, it is worthy of everyone's appreciation, donating more or less, it is charity, since others have contributed, there is no reason to accept the malicious attack and moral condemnation of outsiders.

In today's era of moral kidnapping, forcible fundraising is not uncommon, whether it is under the banner of voluntary consciousness or forced donation, it is now commonplace.

In fact, everyone ignores that donating to charity is not a legal obligation, but a kind of moral consciousness, not to mention that donations are just one of the many ways to do good.

But Chinese are accustomed to measuring charity by how much money they donate, which has allowed moral kidnapping to become increasingly popular in China.

Charity is not only a matter of money, but also should be a "moisturizing things silently" cause, only in the name of voluntary donations, is to make charity this love cause become warm, cohesive and appealing, when charity is kidnapped by the right, when charity is bound by the moral framework, not only hurt people's love, but also lose the true connotation of charity.

But how many sober people are there in this society?

Song Zheng knew very well that at this scene, many people were staring at him, just to see how much money he would donate.

If you donate too much, it is a matter of course, and if you donate less, you are morally corrupt.

But TM Lao Tzu's money is not blown by the wind, every penny is earned by Lao Tzu with his ability, why must he use money to meet the wishes of some people?