There are three kinds of directors in the circle.

Great directors, good directors, and others.

Generally speaking, a great director means a fifth-generation director, or a director who is at the same time as the fifth-generation director.

These directors are basically academic, that is, from professional classes, with relatively professional skills and the most top resources in the circle.

In the mainland, Zhang, Chen, and Feng are respected, and Xiangjiang is respected by Xu, Zhou, Wang, and Wu, and as for Wanwan, there is only one Li.

These eight people are recognized as great directors in China.

What does it mean to be a great director?

It means that even if they make a bad movie, or even after a play becomes a god, there will be no better work, and there will still be countless investors rushing to it!

This is the case with Zhang and Chen.

But the reason why Zhang is stronger than Chen is that in the boundaries of literary films, the national teacher has never been weaker than anyone!

The kind of heaviness that comes from the nation and the country is something that the other seven great directors can't do at all.

This is why Zhang is a national teacher, and Chen, who debuted earlier and became famous earlier, is always inferior.

And although the national teacher has been complained about because he can't control the market, but in the field of literary films, no one can compare.

It is true that the "king" of Xiangjiang is indeed more recognized in the world than the national teacher.

But why was Wang not a national teacher in the first place, but Zhang was?

On the one hand, it is because of Zhang's background, and on the other hand, it is because of the pattern.

Comparatively speaking, the king's pattern is too small.

This stems from the fact that the area of Xiangjiang is too small.

This is also the reason why the other seven big directors have always been inferior to Zhang.

What is a great director?

In Fang Siyi's view, a great director means that when filming, various technologies have reached the extreme, and at this time, what they pursue is how to create their own stories.

Or in other words, the entire crew, only one voice.

So what makes a good director?

Let's take the simplest example.

Kong Sheng.

has filmed a lot of classics, and even now he rarely misses, there are no too obvious weaknesses, and he can give full play to the true strength of the actors.

And the difference between a good director and a big director is the imprint.

In fact, the only difference between a good director and a great director is that in the play of a great director, there is only his personal imprint.

What actors, what plots, only traces of him.

But a good director can only achieve the top of the technical level, but cannot reach the spiritual level.

In other words, a good director's play, generally speaking, is a play led by people.

Only good actors can drive the excellence of the drama.

If the actors' performance is not good, then what awaits them can only be Waterloo.

For example, in Director Kong's previous works, although there are a series of dramas such as "Breaking through the Guandong", there are also some dramas that are not well-known and have a bad reputation.

That's what the actor decides the outcome of.

People remember Li Youbin's performance in "Breaking the Guandong", who remembers the plot in "Breaking the Guandong"?

But in the play of a big director, the actor is only one factor that constitutes the whole play, of course, the actor who can cooperate with the big director has superb acting skills.

But you don't deliberately pay attention to the performance of the actors, but more to the whole plot.

In other words, it's the drama that leads people.

At this point, it is also sad to say, Huaxia can really be regarded as a top director, and there are only these eight directors.

So what are the others?

Others are divided into three types.

The first type is the one with a big reputation, but a low eye.

For example, it is generally believed that the sixth generation of directors.

The second type is neither high nor low, neither up nor down, without too many shortcomings, but also without any advantages.

In other words, even if there is a good script, it is rare to be able to make a classic.

There are even occasional slapping cases.

The third type is a bad movie director in general.

For example, some cross-border.

Including Wang Baobao, Guo Siniang, Zhenhan's father-in-law and so on.

Speaking of which, there are some people in the circle who don't have any talent as a director, but who makes the family rich and has a background?

Playing with his mobile phone and letting more than a dozen assistant directors help shoot is also the only one in the circle.

Well, it's about artificial HH.

In his opinion, Fang Siyi should be just a very ordinary director, after all, he is a copyist.

But in the eyes of outsiders, his coffee position at this moment should be regarded as a good director.

That is, the existence is second only to those big directors.

What is it like to be a good director?

This sentence Yingbao should be the most experienced.

It can be said that the history of Ying Bao's fame is the history of Fang Siyi's personal directorial career.

However, since the two finished working on "Carol", Fang Siyi and Yingbao have temporarily separated.

Fang Siyi went to shoot "4S" with the little fox.

Ying Bao went to shoot "The Legend of Chu Qiao".

Now that the scandal between Fang Siyi and Little Fox is in the dust, the most embarrassing one is Yingbao.

Even Ying Bao complained to Fang Siyi.

The eyes of the people around her were full of stupidity and sympathy.

was so angry that Yingbao wanted to hit someone.

This is also the reason why Fang Siyi had to take Yingbao to play later.

……

When the Lord returns to China, what are you waiting for?

The overwhelming negative news rushed towards Fang Siyi and Dream.

Although a discerning person can see at a glance that there is definitely someone behind this who is fueling the troubles, it is still the same sentence, Fang Siyi has gone too smoothly in the past few years.

I haven't experienced any setbacks, and I made a fire, a fire.

The market is so big, everyone is competing for resources, if you eat too much, then I will eat less.

Caring about personal interests, who can be calm?

In the past, there were some minefields in the industry that no one dared to touch, coupled with the invisible care above, it was inevitable that people would be bogeyed.

But since ancient times, there has been an ancient saying in Huaxia that the law does not blame the public.

Since someone picks the lead and starts thinking about Black, it is natural to start following the trend.

And then, naturally, all kinds of "black materials" broke out.

For example, neither Fang Siyi nor Dream has ever made any donations.

For example, Fang Siyi's peach blossom fortune.

For example, Fang Siyi concealed his true gender and appearance back then.

In short, for a period of time, Fang Siyi seems to have suffered a reversal.

The diss of the whole network is simply excessive.

However, what is strange is that Fang Siyi seems to be silent from beginning to end.

There doesn't seem to be anything to explain.

This is very strange.

What is the situation that Fang Siyi has been in front of an ostrich?

Are you holding back the big move?

Or is he going to make a big news?

In the midst of the hustle and bustle, the time has come to the summer file.