"China Women's Rights QQ Group Chief Complaint...... Who's going to sue that?"

Since the identity of the 'QQ group owner' is mentioned in the case, the cause of the lawsuit must be related to her behavior when she performed her duties as the group leader, right?"

Feng Jianxiong successfully caught the attention of nearly 200 reporters in the field with just one opening remark.

Most reporters, including Kwon Jifang, took the initiative to think about it like the above.

Of course, there are also some pretentious and well-informed names, who think disdainfully in their hearts:

"Maybe it's just trolls scolding each other on the Internet, and after the impact is big, they will take out the other party's flesh and then sue for defamation infringement offline, right?

Luckily, neither side has much time to make up for it.

Feng Jianxiong only hung their appetite for more than ten seconds, and then took the initiative to unravel the answer.

"This case is roughly like this: there is an organization called 'China Feminism', which has organized dozens of groups on QQ, all of which are full-member senior groups. As a result, its total membership is in the tens of thousands. As for the identity of the general group leader, I will not expose it, and I will be called Ms. A from Hujiang.

The main purpose of these groups organized by Ms. A is to connect with like-minded netizens, so that netizens with women's independence and women's self-improvement ideas have a channel to communicate with each other and exchange resources with each other......"

When Feng Jianxiong said this, he paused for two seconds for everyone to digest, also to make the burden behind him more dramatic.

The female reporters looked at each other and felt that there was nothing new so far.

This kind of group where women help each other and provide psychological encouragement seems to be very positive.

However, everyone also knows that those who do women's rights are always easy to be attacked by other anti-feminist people. I don't mean to generalize, in fact, I also know that the main anti-feminist work on the Internet is some men who have no money and are ugly, they feel that the existence of women's rights has raised the general status of women in the marriage and dating market, and increased the difficulty for them to find women-

Of course, I'm not saying that all anti-feminists are like that. I myself do not take any position on this issue, nor do I discuss whether the feminist advocates in this case have the right attitude. If you don't think it's appropriate, you can cut it out. ”

"So far, I believe everyone thinks that this must be a small dispute that is common on the Internet between two factions of people spraying insults at each other. But the case took a turn for the better.

An anti-feminist activist who opposes Ms. A—we also withheld his real name and refers to Mr. B—discovered a gray industry chain in which Ms. A used Q group resources to monetize after tracking and doxing Ms. A's offline activities.

That is, Ms. A spreads extreme feminist ideas in Q groups such as 'Chinese Feminism', gathers the attention and popularity of women who have been emotionally hurt or think that 'Chinese men are not good' for other reasons, and then takes the opportunity to run an intermediary business. Well, it's roughly equivalent to my own 'unpredicted case'-

Ms. A's organization contacted a large number of foreign men, mainly white and black, in Shanghai, and then charged them intermediary fees. Then I posted a message to female group friends in each Q group, saying, 'For girls who want to experience exotic encounters, I can provide opportunities to introduce friends'. Then, the two sides started dating on a large scale.

After intercepting the truth of this 'unanticipated case's intermediary business, Mr. B actually publicized it on the Internet, and insulted Ms. A and her organization as 'Internet veterans in the new era', and sent Chinese girls to be humiliated by foreigners.

After Ms. A repeatedly sued Mr. B and his propaganda organization to clarify and affirm the nature of her business, Mr. B continued to insist on spreading false remarks on a wide range of websites. Said that the organizers represented by Ms. A are responsible for foreigners calling the group of girls in Hujiang nightclub 'Easy-Girl'!

For this reason, Ms. A, unable to bear it, filed a defamation counterclaim against Mr. B——"

Feng Jianxiong's voice stopped abruptly when he said this.

He knows it takes time for journalists to turn their brains.

"Holy......! What kind of logic is this? That woman did organize the sale of YIN. Although that man is a dick, what he accuses her of is true, how can this be called 'reputation infringement'?"

Because today is an Internet forum, many of the reporters who come are not from the rule of law version. It's normal to not know how to do this kind of thing.

Even a few female reporters who are more law-savvy such as Quan Jifang just thought: "Even if you want to sue, this case can only be related to 'privacy', right? But everything is a 'real person', so how can it be called a 'violation of the right to reputation'?"

Anyone who knows the law knows that fabricating false remarks to infringe on the reputation of others is called "infringing on the right to reputation".

If you just disclose some disgraceful things, but as long as the matter itself is a "real person and a real thing", it will definitely have nothing to do with the right to reputation, and at most it will infringe on the "right to privacy".

It's like a paparazzi who posted a bed photo of Guanxi Ge, Gillian and Cecilia on the Internet, which is a proper "invasion of privacy". After all, the picture is not PS by others, but with real guns.

"Mr. Feng, the cause of the case you just described...... Is it wrong? Are you sure it's a 'right to reputation' case?"

Based on those thoughts just now, Quan Jifang asked this question on behalf of the small group of reporters who understood the law.

"No, you heard it right, it's the right to reputation. Feng Jianxiong's answer was as categorical as ever,

"The crux of this case, in fact, you didn't get it - Mr. B's attack on Ms. A is that she became an 'Internet bustard' and organized an illegal online YIN selling activity.

But Ms. A has stated many times that she has not given any financial benefits to the female group members who were on the list. Even, these spontaneous interactions are different from the common '****' in our neighboring countries, because those women do not generally accept money or entertainment directly from foreign men. Perhaps the opening fee at the time of the opening of the two parties was paid by the foreign man, but this does not constitute a money-sex transaction, because the hotel accommodation check-in is the man. The woman did not spend the night in the room either, but was only a temporary 'visitor'.

Therefore, based on all the above legal evidence elements, we can conclude that Mr. B used foul language and insulted Ms. A's behavior characterization - this has nothing to do with the organization selling YIN from beginning to end. The woman is willing to sleep in vain without taking money, how can she sell it?

Although Ms. A herself received the money, since she did not transfer it to the woman in sex, it cannot be characterized as a female ticket, but can only be characterized as an 'intermediary fee'.

Moreover, Ms. A has also stated that she has spent a lot of time and energy providing intermediary services to both parties, so this intermediary fee is only 'labor income'. Just as the matchmaking website 'Century Jiayuan' will also charge intermediary fees, there are also people on it who both parties know that they are fighting each other, but doesn't the website still charge referral fees?

She did not pay her precisely because she was a staunch feminist and could not tolerate the insult of money to the personality of a woman who was free to sexually love - people should make money honorably based on their own labor, but not in exchange for selling a sexual right that would allow both to obtain pleasure. In sex, she believes that men and women are equal, and if the woman receives money, it is a denial that the woman herself is happy.

In this case, Mr. B said that she organized the sale of YIN, what is it if she does not infringe on the right to reputation!"

Feng Jianxiong's last words were really loud.

In this case, the two biggest legal contradictions are suddenly explained:

First of all, regarding Ms. A's collection of money, since "Century Jiayuan" also collects money legally, why can't the QQ group owner who is for the purpose of dating the opposite sex collect money?

Secondly, about Ms. A's refusal to give money to the girl in question - this is respecting the woman's good!

"Therefore, a friend of mine took this commission and helped the client win the lawsuit, demonstrating the justice and strictness of the law!"

Feng Jianxiong took advantage of the shocked moment of the female reporters and waved his hand categorically.

Then, he changed his mind.

"However, this case also gave me a lot to think about. I summarized one sentence, I don't know whether to say it or not. ”

That, of course, is going to be talked about.

All the reporters did not praise it, but listened solemnly and quietly.

"When you think a service is free, it's probably just because you're a commodity—watch my wording, don't misinterpret, and don't take what I mean one step further. I'm a lawyer and I'm an international college debate champion, and you should know that I don't make low-level mistakes.

What I'm saying is, 'It's possible that you're just because you're treated as a commodity,' not 'you're a commodity.'" This is just the subjective opinion of others, and does not represent your objective state of existence, let alone your own subjective state of mind.

In the case just now, I sincerely believe that those girls who pursue freedom are positive. ”

Silence, frightening silence.

When you think a service is free, it's probably just because you're a commodity!!

This sentence later became the public opinion outlet and famous sentence of the West Lake Sword Summit on the same day.

With the previous case as a foreshadowing, all reporters felt that this sentence, which was originally obscure and difficult to have a sense of substitution, became so cordial and so oppressive that people were breathless, as if they were part of this fate.

"Shhh...... Xiaoxiong is worthy of being a master of inciting people's hearts. The front is the same as telling jokes, and the clouds are light and laughing. Suddenly, like Chopin's piano music, a cannon came out of the flowers. Quan Jifang couldn't help but be shocked by the atmosphere and aura in the field.

All that remains is the worship of Feng Jianxiong's eloquence.

And that's clearly not the end of it.

Feng Jianxiong didn't reach the high tide at all.

"When we look at a more universal level, the commodity is not necessarily the 'flesh' in this example. It can be our privacy, or it can be the refreshing feeling and dopamine secretion that our attention and likes bring to others.

Not everything is bad, it's a zero-sum game of exchange – we should admit that most of the 'free' exchange resources in the current Internet free economy are win-win. Just like a free sexual AI, the man has a chicken, the woman has a, after they interact with each other, no one is missing a piece of meat, but they reap the beauty and coolness created out of thin air.

However, we also have to admit that not all deals are so good. This kind of win-win space is easy to be carved up by giants - for example, I believe that most of the domestic businesses that are win-win through exchanges have been under the control of Tengyun. This is the inevitability of the sense of smell of capital.

So, if our society continues to trumpet the unlimited expansion of the free economy, can the next exchange resources we find still guarantee that it will still be a win-win situation?

When you read a copy for free, what you pay may only be 'personal online behavior and habits big data', the data can be copied infinitely, and you are not missing a piece of meat.

When you play a free-to-play online game, you may pay for 'the dopamine that makes RMB players cool after being killed into a dog by RMB players', and you may have to weigh it.

When you finally watch all the consultations and interesting little videos shared on INS for free, what you pay may be that your political leanings are analyzed by the campaign consulting firm, and then pushed to you, 'Your enemy, who you hate, who is actually supporting candidate X, so you should support candidate T'.

Everybody says that the free economy is a 'wool out of the pigs, then the monkeys pay for it, and then the dogs die', and it seems that the sheep have nothing to lose.

But the bigwigs won't tell you that the sheep actually paid something else in this deal. It's just that these things are not currently defined as having an exchange value, and sheep can't be sold directly.

But these things will one day be defined as valuable enough to be sold – just as there is no market for air purifiers and no fresh air to sell when air pollution is not bad enough, and the extra profits that polluters make from excess emissions don't seem to hurt anyone.

However, once the air pollution reaches a certain level, people need to pay for purifiers and fresh air. It will also be known that polluting companies are supposed to pay a 'carbon trading price' for additional pollution above the average level. The reason why we feel that we are not paying anything for the free Internet today is only because the pollutant data is not strong enough, so we are like the British in the early 18th century, and we sing the praises of the big smokey chimneys as a symbol of industrialization.

But I insist that one day, when the world's Internet economy develops, 'I sell my privacy myself, sell it for 10 yuan.'" Then Tengyun charges me 10 yuan a month to drill money, so that I can watch the XXX model without royalties for free, and the whole economy will be healthier than now. ”