A beautiful girl with a hollow valley and blue bamboos like jade, with the momentum of the sound of gold and stone, preached the summary speech that sounded the death knell for the Fudan University team.

There is no doubt that this beauty is Feng Jianxiong's most tacit partner, Yu Meiqin.

Some of her words were led by Feng Jianxiong before the competition, but more of them were condensed by herself after free debate. From the mood to the intonation, from the body movements to the rhythm of the expressions, all reveal a natural beauty.

“…… Marx said in "Capital" that private ownership of property was born at the end of human primitive society, ran through slave society, feudal society, capital attention society, and eventually died out in communist attention society.

Therefore, those who make the judgment that "the more advanced human beings develop, the more private property they should have" based on the reason that "because there is private property in slave society, feudal society, and capitalist society", can be said to be the barking of the Shu dog and the language of the summer worm.

Like the turkey born after Thanksgiving, they only observed it for a short year, because every year they could eat feed after hearing the bell ring at 11 a.m. every year, and they summed up 'always having feed at 11 a.m. every morning' as a 'universal truth'. As everyone knows, the next time Thanksgiving comes, they will face being slaughtered.

So, when you can see how far into the past, you can see how far into the future. Turkey can't understand communist attention, and it can't understand that the right to privacy will eventually die out naturally. Only a wise man who can think on the macro level of the entire history of the universe can understand the indomitability of this wheel of history.

So, is the absence of private property in primitive society and the lack of private property in communism a form? Obviously not, Marx tells us, the former is the selfless property of great material poverty, and the latter is the selfless property of great abundance and overflow of material production.

In the same way, the concept of privacy, in the history of human development, has gone through a similar stage of development from scratch to re-extinction - the former is that there are too few people who can know and do not need the concept of privacy, while the latter is that there are too many people that human beings can know deeply and do not need the concept of privacy.

Before the emergence of the great division of labor in the socialization of capital, we lived in a society of acquaintances, so we did not need privacy, and the social order composed of the old patriarchs and relatives in the neighborhood allowed everyone to understand each other's details, so privacy was not important.

It's just that after capital pays attention to deconstructing and reorganizing society into 'stranger cooperation', it is limited by the constraints of the human brain - according to the analysis of physiologists, the human brain can only build more than 200 strong social relationships, or even thousands or tens of thousands of weak social relationships at most, without the help of any external force.

This data is still calculated according to our 'Homo sapiens'. According to the latest archaeological results of anthropologists in recent years, if it is a 'Neanderthals' that have been wiped out by our ancestors, they may only have a strong social relationship of 30~50 people - Neanderthals have a brain capacity that is not weaker than Homo sapiens, and their physique is stronger. It was only because of their lower range of social cooperation that they were exterminated by our ancestors, Homo sapiens.

So that is to say, if a person does not rely on external technology, only relies on physiological instinct, at most he can only know and use the details of less than 200 people - but under the large division of labor of capital, he needs to cooperate with tens of thousands of people, so at this time, in order to protect himself, human beings can only use privacy to shroud themselves, just to avoid the insecurity and unfairness caused by 'in case others know my private affairs very well, but I don't know his private affairs'.

It can be seen that, from the perspective of jurisprudence, this pursuit is only an expedient measure implemented for the secondary legal interest of 'fairness', and is not the original goal pursued by human beings.

However, in the future, with the development of the Internet, artificial intelligence, and big data technology, how can we know that human beings cannot use information technology to break through the cognitive limits of the human brain, and change from 'maintaining a strong relationship between 200 very familiar people' to 'being able to understand and grasp the details of millions of people anytime and anywhere'?

Imagine if there is a social credit system that allows both parties to know each other's details equally, and the data will automatically pop up as soon as you swipe your face, so what's so bad?

The world will complete a state from 'everyone only knows the roots of 200 people', and moves forward to 'everyone only knows the roots of dozens of people, and wraps themselves in the rest of the society', and finally reaches the state of 'everyone can know the roots of millions or even hundreds of millions of people' - this is nothing impossible, and the cost of data collection and application is falling at an exponential rate of several times every year.

In today's era, we may still see a lot of telecommunications fraud and malicious sales promotion caused by privacy leakage, but can this really only be solved through historical regression and network disconnection? Theoretically, if every phone card in the country can be real-named, and all network virtual phones are forcibly locked to track IP and the personal ID of Internet users, then telecommunication fraud will be eliminated all at once.

Therefore, the existence of this kind of fraud is not a simple problem of privacy leakage!

It's the problem that the privacy leakage is not reciprocal enough, and the privacy of some criminals hiding in dark corners is hidden!

In our pursuit of 100% real-name system, it may indeed be more and more painful.

Because good people are always easy to be real-named, while bad people are always more professional in how to prevent being real-name and poached, so that they can hide for a while longer - but as long as the country and industry have a plan of action and determination, it is really just a period of time, and it will be over after enduring.

With such a wonderful prospect, should we still have a reason to reject this matter that is obviously going to bring a favorable outcome on the whole because of the short-term pains? The rolling forward of the Internet and intelligent information technology has obviously brought about tremendous progress of the times and can cure the problem of privacy once and for all.

In this situation, we can't help but ask the other side: When your mother gave birth to you, because the head of the fetus is the thickest part of the body, in order to reduce the pain, she held you back into the womb, without the slightest regard for the meaning of life?

Which is more important?

Finally, I would like to say that even if the right to privacy becomes an irrelevant right that is no longer of concern to society and the law, that does not mean that we cannot pursue privacy and value it – we have never opposed the right to privacy today, but we are only weighing it against human development.

We're just saying that when the day comes, it's so slight that it's not worth using laws and policies to regulate it.

For individuals who are obsessed with privacy, we will still tolerate and respect their own choices. They can use their phones, throw away their computers, and go into seclusion in the mountains.

In any era, such people will be given the dignity of independence from the world - but we should not limit the development of Internet technology. Thank you, I'm done. ”

Yu Meiqin's sonorous and powerful summary statement echoed in the studio, deafening.

The four members of the Fudan University team felt a burst of despair from the depths of their souls.

"What kind of play is this? and this kind of operation?!" Gu Heren and Bai Jingyou's souls were shouting, hoarse, and there was nothing to love.

Prior to Yu's closing remarks, the Fudan University team had not resisted repeatedly during the free debate stage.

However, the focus of Gu Heren's resistance is nothing more than the perspective of exhaustive examples such as "privacy is violated, it is easy to be defrauded, it is easy to be harassed, it is easy to be maliciously promoted, and it is easy to be ......unsafe".

However, in terms of the structure of the theoretical system, the Fudan University team has completely lost its ability to resist after Feng Jianxiong has built a theoretical three-board axe.

The Jinling University team used a group similar to "Although these problems are caused by privacy leakage, they are also caused by the other party's privacy leakage is not thorough enough, and the two sides are not equal enough and unfair enough." So in the end, it's a question of fairness, not a question of whether privacy should be leaked".

And this kind of analysis angle, no one in the Fudan team thought of it before the game! No one even thought of this possibility!

This can't be blamed on the incompetence of the Fudan team, it is really in the debate circle on the earth in 06, and no one would think of this kind of reverse problem-solving angle.

Just like before the earthlings came into contact with the Trisolaran, before Luo Ji and Ye Wenjie were born, they couldn't understand the truth of "cosmic sociology".

"The Jinling Division Brigade actually came up with this idea! They actually chose to analyze this issue from such a grand perspective as the history of the universe and civilization! It is really a strange entry point that no one can think of!" Judge Luo Fat Man clenched his fists, thinking of the wonderful excitement, his palms were sweating.

And every detail is so meticulous, from the "Oxford Dictionary of Law" to the relevant evidence of jurisprudence, everything is covered, even the concept of privacy, a legal term, which was caused in 1890. The scope of the discussion is so tightly defined that there is no chance to fight the definition battle at all!

It is not surprising that any of these points are taken out separately and thought of it, but the difficult thing is that the whole story is so interlocking and echoing, and every pit is filled, admire, admire!" said Gao Dasong, another judge.

The host of the competition, Sa Beining, watched the five judges turn their heads and ears, and they all showed admiration and approval, and estimated that this should be the division team to win.

"This ...... This can be regarded as making history, right?The first non-985 junk university in history to qualify for an international competition in Sing Tao?" Sa Beining looked at the relevant materials he had read before the game, and found that it was indeed a record.

In his mind, a ridiculous sentence that has just become popular among online trolls in the past two years involuntarily came to his mind:

"It's not that Fudan doesn't do his best, but Brother Xiong has Gundam. ”

……

"Thank you for your trust and it is a great honour to represent the jury in tonight's competition. ”

Ten minutes later, as the dust settled, the poet Yu Qiuyu was recommended by a group of peers (in fact, it was predetermined), pretended to be humble and walked up to the rostrum, sat next to Sa Beining, sorted out the microphone, and began to speak.

"First of all, I would like to thank the teams from both sides tonight for a great game. From debating skills to planning the layout. I have to say that the two teams tonight, in these aspects, are the best I've seen in the game so far this year.

The Fudan University team seems to have done a lot of preparations, and the arguments are very large and solid. The argument stage is majestic and lofty, while the free debate stage is short, frequent and very tenacious. But the fly in the ointment is that on the whole, it gives people a feeling that he has not made the right place, and he does not anticipate the opponent's offensive point enough, and when asked about the key contradictions, there is a lack of head-to-head confrontation, and his phenomenon is still there in the left and right.

In contrast, the Jinling Normal University team does not have any advantages in terms of arguments and case organization. However, the construction of their theoretical system and the selection of attack points are really very clear and unthinkable. Many of the macro outlooks are very ambitious, unheard of, but seem to be reasonable......"

After the unanimous evaluation of the jury, the best debater in this competition is: the opponent of the fourth debate, Yu Meiqin. ”

"Now, I will hand over the final verdict of the competition to the moderator to read out. ”

Yu Qiuyu said, handing an envelope to Sa Beining as usual.

For the best debater, Yu Meiqin temporarily took the limelight, and the team members on the division team side were also expected - mainly because the enemy's ability to predict this topic was relatively poor, so many confrontations at the level of the theoretical system were not easy to form confrontations during free debate.

Therefore, in the pre-game plan, Feng Jianxiong took care of it: "If the enemy does not attack the point that 'the right to privacy only exists at a certain stage of human history', then we don't have to talk too much, so as not to remind the other party." As long as the outstanding parts of our overall theoretical system are left for the summary of the presentation, it can be systematically released. ”

Such a strategic and tactical arrangement, as well as the enemy's bias, contributed to Yu Meiqin's final perfect play.

Feng Jianxiong is used to winning the best debater, so he doesn't feel jealous of his teammates. Although this is the final and has the highest gold content, it is only a domestic event after all. After next year's winter vacation, the international competition in Sing Tao will be the final highlight.

On the rostrum, Sa Beining unfolded it in a businesslike manner, smiling but without saying anything: "Now I announce that the result of the jury's evaluation is 1:4, and the team of Jinling Normal University wins! Let us congratulate them!"

"Won! Finally won! Sure enough, I won!"

In the audience, Shi Nicole, Feng Yiji, and Zhou Tianyin cried with joy and hugged warmly.

Ding Lihui took the DV, was stunned for a while, and sighed: "Even a strong school like Fudan can win...... Shouldn't I be glad that many seniors haven't had the opportunity to report such exciting news......"

"Losing to such an opponent...... Could it be that the legends are all true? That Feng Jianxiong, is it that there are many beautiful women in the Tushi, so he deliberately smashed that kind of bad school in the college entrance examination?" Gu Heren was depressed for a while, and the arrogance of letting the other party kneel down and sing about conquest before the game had long been forgotten in Java.