"Please note that the word I used in my last sentence was 'technological invention'. In other words, all 'inventions' are for commercial purposes, but this assertion is limited to the category of 'inventions' and cannot be taken any further.

I didn't say that all 'scientific research' is for commercial purposes – the results of 'scientific research', and many of them are fundamental research that cannot be patented. The results can be formed into papers and scientific discoveries, but they cannot be concretely formed into products or processes and methods that can be patented.

Since the day the Patent Law was enacted, it has encouraged the formation of commercially valuable invention patents, while slightly discouraging the investment of researchers in basic research that cannot be patented. This is well known, and I don't want to waste too much space.

In the same way, the commercialization of literary works does not necessarily lead to the blossoming of literary creation categories. When it was free, there were many people who could write unique and unique works that were not kitsch or deliberately considered 'reader compatibility' for the sake of their interests and hobbies.

After paying, although the payment system itself is not bad, it will make most undisciplined online literary writers fall into 'learn from each other's big data, and follow the trend to write whatever is popular', the diversity of literary creation will be seriously harmed, and the more developed the industry, the more serious the phenomenon of following the trend of pigs, and in the end, just like Hollywood commercial blockbusters, all the spiritual garbage left to be used for coolness. Of course, mental garbage is not bad, at least they can also provide a large amount of pure refreshment. ”

Feng Jianxiong did it in one go, and extracted the outline of the debate that the new mission academy might have from the perspective of "fees are not necessarily conducive to content innovation".

Shi Nicole and Chen Sicong had no reaction at all, and they were completely in the psychological stage of quickly plugging new brain holes.

Fortunately, Yu Meiqin is still always sharp, and she almost instantly grasped the point of rebuttal:

"The skew of resources does not mean that diversity is inhibited. It just pulled those swing creators who had no ideals, interests and will to the side of the following pigs. It would be somewhat arbitrary to extend this alone to the theory that 'bad money drives out good money'.

We can completely quote Guo Xiaosi's words when he sprayed Director Feng back: "My audience has cultivated this quality, even if I don't make "Little Times", Jia Zhangke's movies will not be watched. I'm just serving a group of people who are uneducated and unqualified, who have been abandoned by the mainstream literary circle, and who would never have walked into the cinema, what's in the way of you?'"

Feng Jianxiong didn't know why Guo Xiaosi of this world started IP operation a few years in advance, but he did just that. Anyway, it is also an adaptation of Xiaosi's own novel, and it doesn't take much butterfly effect to contribute to this.

Now, this case provides an argument against Py.

Shi Nicole finally reacted: "Yes, whether it is a pure and cool article that follows the trend, or "Little Times", it attracts all whites who can't watch online literature or movies before. This doesn't hurt cultural diversity at all!

Yu Meiqin was still calm: "Don't be too happy, there are countless specific offensive plays in the new academy at this point." My set of rhetoric just happened to deal with the angle of interpretation that Mr. Feng just had. ”

Feng Jianxiong thanked him with relief: "Thank you for your understanding-I just hope to inspire everyone, so as not to underestimate the enemy." There are many more articles that can be done in this regard, and we must be well prepared. ”

So, while flipping through the book, a team of people looked up information on Yu Meiqin's ThinkPad notebook, discussed and refuted each other, and carefully picked out the pros and cons of "free strategy for Internet content innovation", and gnawed it little by little.

Especially with Feng Jianxiong and Yu Meiqin, two teammates with keen thinking and insight, who directly confronted and collided with sparks of ideas, the discussion efficiency of the whole team was simply improving rapidly.

If you want to improve, the most important thing is to have an opponent who is on the same footing. This is also the reason why many debate teams only rely on a single god to carry the whole court C does not move.

The strategies that a person can think of when he fights alone and "fights left and right" in his mind are very one-sided and limited after all. It is also to deal with junior opponents.

After the pair of Feng Jianxiong and Yu Meiqin competed, the strength of the law school team was more than twice as strong as in the first three group games. This is definitely a win-win situation where 1+1 is greater than 2. In time, this new team is fully sure to challenge the highest level of Jinling Normal University.

……

The whole team spent most of the afternoon doing a solid job of the half of the debate that was originally thought to be beneficial to their side, and then "it is advisable to chase the poor with the remaining courage", and continue to explore the half of the debate that originally thought that it belonged to the home of the new mission academy.

Is it really conducive to the "dissemination" of content?

At this point, not only Shi Nike is not optimistic, but even Yu Meiqin is in deep thought, completely like encountering a hedgehog and not knowing from which angle.

"The same resource, one free and one charged, must be spread more widely and seen by more people for free, which is nothing to say. The tone of Yu Meiqin was set a little dull.

Shi Nicole agreed: "Indeed, unless we go back to talking about piracy, there is nothing to resist this." Alas, it is too insidious for the New Mission Institute to influence the organizing committee to come up with this topic. Make it clear that we don't want to talk about piracy. ”

"It's really hard to argue, but we can't give up our efforts to get points - the debate is about the 'pros and cons of free strategies on Internet content dissemination', and since it is 'pros and cons', it is not only a quantitative indicator of 'speed and scope', but also a qualitative indicator. Only by taking into account both quality and quantity can we comprehensively judge the pros and cons.

In terms of the 'quantity' of transmission, I agree with the two of you in principle, there is nothing to resist, and it is better to let the new mission institute be arrogant. But we still have a lot to do about the word 'quality'. ”

Feng Jianxiong said a few words lightly, which boosted morale again.

Even Yu Meiqin, who is from a humble background, also completely gave birth to awe for the first time.

Previously, whether it was the competition with the Academy of Mathematical Sciences or the preparation of the debate in the first half of this game, Yu Meiqin had always asked herself that her level of knowledge was not below Feng Jianxiong, or that it was difficult to see an obvious gap.

This time, however, the gap was finally revealed.

"Wouldn't you? You can still tell the flowers from this angle? I would like to hear it. Yu Meiqin couldn't help but be curious.

Feng Jianxiong is not very self-conscious, the reason why he can see so far is not that his sensitivity and insight are really so much stronger than Yu Meiqin, it is completely because he has more than 15 years of knowledge and knows the future development trend of the media.

He said this, and finally the girls' eyes lit up completely.