The same night, half past eight.

There was an undercurrent surging outside the venue, and Feng Jianxiong's popularity and the number of blog fans skyrocketed wildly under the impetus of TV shows and word of mouth from big guys.

In the auditorium of Jinling University, Feng Jianxiong was still calmly fighting with his opponent.

Because it is impossible for news from outside the field to come in, the opponents who are fighting at home opposite him have not yet had time to fully realize the strength of the enemy.

As mentioned earlier, tonight's debate on whether the advent of smartphones will do more good than bad or worse than good, seems to be relatively open, and there is more room for maneuver.

The degree of unfairness between the pros and cons of the debate is also slightly lighter than last year's Group B final of the International Collegiate Debate Tournament, "whether the advantages of mobile phone technology outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages".

But in general, it is still a congenital advantage of Zhengfang - after all, every scientific and technological progress, in the eyes of the audience and judges, always has a greater probability of benefits outweighing disadvantages.

This further contributes to the preset psychological advantage of the Jinling University team.

The composition of tonight's Jinling University team is two men and two women, which is similar to Feng Jianxiong's matching ratio - in history, when Jinling University won the world runner-up in 90 years, it sent a combination of 4 team members who were purely female students, which shows that the school spirit of Jinling University has always focused on the use of girls.

However, there are many girls, and the technical characteristics inevitably tend to "plan debates". That is, the typhoon, the intonation, the body language, and the rhythm are all mastered to the top, but once the debate plan is disrupted by the enemy, the improvisation and plugging the leak are a little stiff. They will even avoid questions and emphasize them over and over again.

This is not discriminating against girls, it's just that Kim Dae's cultivation and provocative style is so.

"Is this the university that has won the second place in the world? Finally, it has met its first world-class rival. Before starting to make a statement, except for Feng Jianxiong, the other three girls on the Jinling Normal University side were all so excited in their hearts at this moment.

Although the other party only won the world runner-up more than ten years ago, his strength is now only the top five in China. But to have the opportunity to beat a world-class opponent, even if it's already outdated, is very exciting after all.

In the midst of everyone's thoughts, Qiao Zhiya, the Jinling team, had already stood up and started her opening speech.

Qiao Zhiya's heart is still very confident.

"Hello to the hosts, judges, and audiences...... As we all know, the emergence of smart phones has made human life more and more convenient, and content media has become more and more abundant......"

“…… The advent of smart phones has also made communication and communication between human beings closer, more convenient and more instantaneous. so that space, distance and time are no longer barriers to human communication......"

“…… Finally, smart phones have also promoted the implementation of a large number of basic applied science and technology research, promoted the deepening of the 'integration of production, education and research', and allowed more technologies in the laboratory to get realistic business scenarios, further promoting social employment, scientific and technological progress, and industrial development ......"

Three minutes, no more than one second, no less, the tone is subdued and the rhythm is relaxed, everything is just right. The overall argument is basically no different from last year's international competition, the skeleton is very similar, but the rhetoric and examples have been changed.

The only fly in the ointment is that the enemy's "preventive argument definition plugging" is not very strict - that is, because there are no reborns in the Jinling team, it is impossible to accurately "predict" in advance how Feng Jianxiong will ask Nan Xiaoyuan to define the trap in the argument.

Of course, if it is not strict, it is not strict, and the attempt in this regard has been made.

Qiao Zhiya's "preventive plugging" puts it this way: "In addition, some people may say that the emergence of mobile phones will reduce face-to-face communication, weaken human touch, and excessive use of mobile phones will bring various occupational diseases and physical damage. But we must point out that this is only due to the fact that the current mobile phone technology is not developed enough.

In the future, with the advancement of sensor technology, the improvement of the push mechanism, the ergonomic design and the iteration of display technology, we can completely solve these defects. Therefore, the advent of smartphones definitely outweighs the disadvantages. ”

All the expert judges and spectators can clearly see that this remark is mainly based on the experience of reviewing last year's international competition, and pre-refuted the points that "the advent of smartphones has reduced face-to-face communication, made the world more indifferent, and made everyone's attention more inattentive" - because this is how Gyeongseong Language Institute lost to South Korean Foreign Chinese University last year. So the Jinling team is obviously guessing today that the division and brigade will also attack at this point.

"It's a bit conservative, it's flat, and it's not ornamental, but it's still decent. It's like a familiar routine. ”

There were five judges in the venue, some nodded slightly, and some showed thoughts. There are also some people who are particularly demanding and picky, and only care about frowning and picking mistakes.

At this stage of the competition, the judges who can be appointed are basically well-known cultural people in the society, such as Professor Wang, a famous teacher of the Department of Chinese as a Foreign Language at Beijing Foreign University, as well as Yu Qiuyu, a domestic poet, and Luo Fatzi, a director of CCTV's language programs, and so on.

……

"Don't be nervous, the debate team of Jinling University has long passed its prime. They also do a better job of accuracy, and there is nothing to be afraid of creativity. ”

On the side of the division team, Nan Xiaoyuan silently recited Feng Jianxiong's words of comfort before the game, glanced at the outline he had just changed, took a deep breath, and stood up.

“…… Hello everyone, before I state my point of view, I would like to say a few words of shame -- after listening to the opening remarks of the opponent's defense friend just now, I can't help but have the illusion that I thought that our side was preparing the wrong debate today. Later, I watched the subtitles on the electronic screen several times before I dared to believe that I was not mistaken.

What are we going to argue about today? Is the emergence of smartphones more pros than cons or discons than pros', so the pros and cons of this 'mobile phone technology progress' have nothing to do with it!

Of course, we know that mobile phones are a good thing, they facilitate communication, deepen communication, promote the economy, and promote the use of technology. We also know that the progress of mobile phone technology will definitely make these conveniences and promotions more in-depth -- but! All these benefits are the benefits brought by the progress of the mobile phone itself! It has nothing to do with whether the mobile phone is 'smart' or not!

Therefore, please don't force the other side to give the benefits that non-smartphones already have, or the 'common' benefits that all mobile phones have, to the 'smartphones' for this incident!

Therefore, we believe that in order to discuss today's debate, it is necessary to first define and define 'smartphone' strictly.

AS WE ALL KNOW, THE CONCEPT OF 'SMART PHONE' HAS APPEARED IN THE WORLD, AND IT IS A HANDFUL OF MI-CHINA ELECTRONIC PRODUCT COMPANIES ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE OCEAN, SUCH AS THE DEFINITION OF APPLE, AND THEY HAVE ALSO TAKEN OUT A DISPLAY MACHINE, TO BE EXACT, IT IS AN IPHONE.

THEREFORE, WE BELIEVE THAT THE SCOPE OF TODAY'S DEBATE SHOULD REFER TO THE SETTING OF THE TECHNOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN 'SMARTPHONES', WHICH MEET THE TECHNICAL DEFINITION OF PRODUCTS SUCH AS IPHONES, AND TRADITIONAL MOBILE PHONES, AND WHETHER THE ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES OR THE DISADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH THE ADVANTAGES.

It is not simply equivalent to 'whether the future mobile phone will help mankind more than the disadvantage or the harm will outweigh the benefit compared with the ancient mobile phone'. 'Smartphones' are only the experimental products of the current generation, and they do not qualify as 'mobile phones of the future', and perhaps in the near future, people will find that this generation of products is just a failed trial and error of human needs, and it is not known that they will soon be crushed by the wheels of history rolling forward......"

The opening remarks of five or six hundred words, Rao is Nan Xiaoyuan had already prepared, sped up the speed of speech, and spent a full minute.

In other words, on the side of the division and brigade, there is only 2 minutes to state their own dry goods, and the first minute is completely used to taunt and limit the opponent.

Fortunately, when Feng Jianxiong and his teammates discussed, they noticed the importance of the first part, so they compressed the dry goods in the back, and the time was enough.

And the judges' listless expressions at the beginning were finally activated, and they cast inquiring glances at each other, as if they felt that the scene had become Intristine.

"There are ideas, it seems that in the definition of the battle link, Shida is more brainy than Jinling. RIGIDLY NARROWED THE QUESTION FROM THE PK BETWEEN 'EXISTING MOBILE PHONES AND FUTURE MOBILE PHONES' TO THE PROS AND CONS BETWEEN 'EXISTING MOBILE PHONES AND IPHONE-LIKE MOBILE PHONES'. Only in this way can the debate be brought into play!" Professor Wang secretly thought to himself.

"THAT WAY, AS LONG AS IT TURNS OUT THAT THE IPHONE AND ITS IMITATIONS ARE DEAD RUBBISH, THERE IS HOPE FOR THE COMPETITION. The corners of Fat Luo's mouth showed a playful expression of Intristine.

OF COURSE, SUCH A TOPIC SPLITTING TECHNIQUE WILL INEVITABLY BE COUNTERPRODUCTIVE IN SOME SPECIFIC SITUATIONS, FOR EXAMPLE, A FEMALE WRITER SURNAMED CHEN SHOWED DISDAIN AND SAID IN HER HEART: "IPHONE IS SUCH A BEAUTIFUL FULL-SCREEN MOBILE PHONE, CAN YOU ALSO HACK IT?"

As a woman, she was born with a bit of face control attributes, and she always felt that looking good was king for mobile phones, and the function was not important. AFTER WATCHING QIAOGOU'S PRESS CONFERENCE BEFORE, I THOUGHT THE IPHONE WAS GOOD, SO I didn't have a good impression of the division team because of my preconceived ideas.

Where there are advantages, there are disadvantages, and this is inevitable.

In the atmosphere of everyone's expectation, Nan Xiaoyuan successfully finished the opening speech of the follow-up part, and the general content is nothing more than the following points:

“…… Therefore, we have never said that the progress of mobile phone technology is not good, nor has we said that mobile phones are not good. But we can also see that before the advent of smart phones, because of the limitations of mobile phone functions, mobile phone energy consumption is generally low, and the service life and stability are also high, so the replacement is relatively slow, and the frequency of environmental pressure such as electronic waste is also low.

AFTER THE EMERGENCE OF FULL-SCREEN SMARTPHONES REPRESENTED BY IPHONE, ON THE ONE HAND, WE CAN FULLY PREDICT THAT BECAUSE OF THE EXPLOSION OF ITS FUNCTIONS AND THE NUMBER OF SUPPORTED SOFTWARE, IT WILL INEVITABLY LEAD TO THE RAPID LAG OF MOBILE PHONE CPU, MEMORY AND VARIOUS HARDWARE INDICATORS AFTER THE LAUNCH OF THE MOBILE PHONE, SO PEOPLE WHO HAVE CHANGED A MOBILE PHONE IN THREE OR FIVE YEARS WILL ALSO BE FORCED TO CHANGE A MOBILE PHONE IN TWO YEARS OR EVEN A YEAR. This has invisibly caused huge social waste and environmental pollution caused by e-waste -

On the other hand, as we all know, smart phones with full screens and high processing power chips far exceed traditional mobile phones in terms of energy consumption, which actually exceeds the physical bottleneck of battery technology at this stage, forming a short board. And the basic science of human beings in the field of battery technology cannot make a breakthrough in the short few years of the emergence of smartphones - therefore, to force smartphones in the current era will inevitably bring battery madness, limit expansion, and safety approaching a critical point.

We can fully foresee that in the future, the battery explosion and spontaneous combustion during charging/use of smartphones will definitely rise significantly compared with traditional mobile phones, posing a threat to the personal and property safety of users. This is all the drawbacks of the form of 'smart phone' when the supporting physical hardware technology has not kept up, and the forcible big leap forward.

In addition, according to the corresponding psychological research, the emergence of smartphones in the form of full screens will further exacerbate human addiction and dependence on mobile phones, and reduce people's ability to practice free will and self-control. These are all social harms brought about by smartphones......"

——

PS: The above is already 3,000 words, and the latter paragraph is reduced as much as possible to ensure that the total number is less than 4,000 words.

This passage was intended to be written in the author's words, but it could not be written.

After yesterday's chapter, a vote of "straight daughter" sent a private message: saying that my plot yesterday used the "virgin" issue as an example to illustrate the problem of "occasional stumbling/breaking cans", which is an insult to women.

I can only retort to everyone here:

First of all, I've never said that girls should be despised/treated differently if they are not virgins before marriage (think about it a little and take 10,000 steps back, even if I really have a virginity complex in my heart, but with my level of trolls who speak without leaking, will I make this kind of low-level mistake of giving people a handle?)

Therefore, yesterday's passage is just for example, and it happens to be used, so that anyone with a discerning eye can understand the logic behind it. That's just emphasizing that "don't judge a person with a black-and-white high-voltage line", but to have a more humane statistical dimension and look at people with flesh and blood.

Well, regarding premarital sex, it is well known that this is an era of increasing freedom and should not hinder everyone's freedom.

If I had to express my personal opinion, I think it would only be "open and honest and live my true self".

If you like to play more, you can play more, and if you like to be a little more traditional, you can be a little more traditional, and everyone will not interfere with each other and have the courage to express it.

The only contemptible person is probably just a person who deceives and betrays his three views.

Now that society is so open, men in China who don't care about their wives' history don't dare to say 100 million, I estimate that there are still 50 million. So those girls with a more complicated history actually don't have the problem of "not being able to get married", isn't it good to be honest with yourself?