Nan Xiaoyuan's thesis, summed up, mainly highlights one sentence: Practice is the only criterion for testing truth, and early access to society for middle school students has many benefits.

It can not only cultivate interest in learning and find the real motivation for learning, but also better adapt to the characteristics of the new era of "lifelong learning", and cultivate the correct three views and mature mind from an early age......

Finally, I did not forget to mention the possible risks that middle school students may have in contact with society as soon as possible, and then analyzed the causes and responsibilities of these risks in one stroke, and categorized these risks to "problems in the development process, not problems of the route".

As an argument, it's enough defensively.

After all, the opposing side has not yet launched an attack, and it is not appropriate for the positive side to say a lot of details to pursue advantages and avoid disadvantages.

Overall, the argument is calm and calm, and the theme is clear and steady.

In Bai Zhizhong, the number one main force of the opposing side, when listening to the positive arguments, he always maintained a calm and steady mentality, and did not neglect it at all. It is a master of the Yuanyue Mountain.

"I thought that the young man would be aggressive, and he would take the liberty of speculating on the movements of his opponents and taking the initiative to defend himself. I didn't expect this Feng Jianxiong to be so slow to show off his skills, and he could train such a steady and steady theory.

It doesn't look pretty, but it's deeply rooted. The mere phrase 'practice is the only criterion for testing truth' exhausts the benefits of early contact with society. The rest of the disadvantage is that he intends to wait for our side to come to the door, and then they will not change the situation in the free debate session. ”

Bai Zhizhong analyzed in his mind.

He couldn't help but think of Zha Liangyong's "Heaven and Dragon Slayer", which describes the bridge section when Zhang Wuji's "Jiuyang Divine Skill" was first formed.

He is strong, he is strong, and the breeze blows on the hills. He is crossed by him, and the bright moon shines on the river.

Feng Jianxiong's theory is this kind of clumsy style.

"There is no need to question the benefits of early contact with society, the positive meaning of the other party is very substantial, we delete some, brush it off, and then go straight to the risks and harms of early contact with society. Bai Zhizhong took advantage of the moment when Nan Xiaoyuan was about to finish speaking, and handed a small note to his teammate.

The opposing side argues that Hu Li is also the weakest one in the team, but the execution is still very good. There are many modules prepared for the argument, which can be added or deleted at any time according to the scene. When he got the captain's instructions, he naturally deleted and corrected them immediately.

Just seven or eight seconds after the "15 seconds left" time reminder bell on the square, Nan Xiaoyuan slowly retracted the last word. The time is still relatively accurate.

According to the rules of the national debate, although points will be deducted for overtime violations, if it is too short, less than half a minute of the scheduled time, it is also possible to deduct points.

The best way to do this is to end your speech after the second warning bell (two warnings for 30 seconds and two warnings for 15 seconds remaining) and before time runs out.

Nan Xiaoxuan still has seven or eight seconds left, judging from the situation, Zhengfang's point of view today is not too long, and it is already a good time to slow down the speed of speech, which also shows that Feng Jianxiong is preparing to play "tower defense", so he pestle the core argument to the door of the opponent's main base, and then wait for the other party to rush up.

"Okay, thank you to the positive side for strictly adhering to the game time. The following is a case for the opposing side, and the time is also three minutes, please start. The host, Sa Beining, read out the unchanged lines rigorously.

The opposing side argued Hu Li: "The opponent's defense friend emphasized the benefits of so many students participating in social practice, and of course we will not deny these benefits." If today's debate is about 'whether middle school students should come into contact with society', then I don't think there is a need to debate, we just admit defeat, and we should really get in touch with society."

Fortunately, today's debate is not about that, but about whether middle school students should be exposed to society as soon as possible. A 'as soon as possible' shows that the core of the debate lies in the 'timing', and in the various uncontrollable risks behind the timing, rather than whether to contact or not. Those tirades that are conclusive by the opponent's defense friend will inevitably be suspected of changing concepts and not being on the right topic......"

Hu Li's few words made Tian Haimo and Yu Meiqin feel a little shaken.

It's not how well Hu Li said it, but the opening style of this rebuttal argument is too strong "white stream".

Bai Zhizhong has dominated the Asian spray scene for four or five years, and his tactics have naturally been deeply studied by trolls from various universities in Asia. Bai Zhizhong's favorite provocative sentence is "If we are arguing XXX today, then I completely agree with the other party's argument friend's point of view, and we will directly admit defeat." It's a pity that we are arguing YYY today, so the opponent's defense friend secretly changed the concept and was shameless......"

So much so that when fighting against Wanwan Shih-Hsin University, once the enemy hears this sentence, he will always be startled by the preemptive sound, thinking that he has been tricked again.

In fact, sometimes Bai Zhizhong is just bluffing and scary. It's a pity that he has a great reputation for murder, and he has killed too many opponents with this trick, so that the opponent can be easily cheated.

"Don't be nervous, he's bluffing. Didn't we say that we started singing a high-profile pretend to be harmless to people and animals, and wait for the other side to attack, isn't this still in our plan!"

Feng Jianxiong used a very low volume and a serious tone to enlighten Tian Haimo beside him.

Tian Haimo immediately calmed down from the instinctive panic, and quietly pinched Yu Meiqin beside her.

In today's final, the Jinling Division Brigade temporarily adjusted its formation. Feng Jianxiong and Yu Meiqin switched positions, and Feng Jianxiong moved to the fourth debate, in order to make it easier to improvise when summarizing the arguments.

After the team members quieted down, they continued to listen to Hu Li's arguments.

Hu Li, who was on the field, had already talked about the dangers of middle school students' early exposure to society.

“…… The opponent's defense friend seems to have confused the concept that contact with society cannot simply be equated with 'social practice', let alone 'test what you have learned with practice'. In fact, when more middle school students come into contact with society in their early days, their minds are not yet fully mature, and their three views have not yet been formed, so they are subject to protection under the Law on the Protection of Minors.

What they learn from society is to steal their family's money to play games in black Internet cafes, or to put it mildly, to eat, drink, gamble, smoke, and even enrich their hearts.

Let's take the statistics of your country's judiciary: in 2006, there were more than 470,000 juvenile delinquencies in your country, of which more than 446,000 were left prematurely and entered society on their own. Two-thirds of them leave junior high school or graduate school and go straight to work or idle. And this number has a compound growth rate of 10%~15% every year.

More than half of these people are involved in sexual crimes, and it is even more common to go to black Internet cafes, and even more than 100,000 members are full of Xinyue. Should the opposing side turn a blind eye to such a serious social problem? Isn't the result of these madness a problem caused by middle school students' early exposure to society before their minds mature?"

"In addition to falling into breaking the law and committing crimes because they can't distinguish between right and wrong, there are also a larger number of middle school students who originally came into contact with society with good and pure motives and wanted to do something meaningful, such as participating in social welfare services, doing odd jobs on holidays to experience social hardships, and even starting a business.

But we also have to see that most of the people who are exposed to these things in high school or even junior high school have suffered from the failure of the results and psychological trauma.

The success rate of high school students in school is less than 5% of the success rate of undergraduate students. Compared with those who start their own businesses after graduating from undergraduate, the success rate is less than 2%, and the vast majority of immature young people have become cannon fodder in a deceitful society. Before you are fully prepared with your mind and experience, you will blindly become cannon fodder!

The probability of junior high school students being deceived by experiential part-time jobs is at least dozens of times that of college students' internships. Some girls have lost their honor. And the number of boys and girls who have been deceived into MLM organizations is also staggering.

Having said all this, we have never said that middle school students are not allowed to make mistakes in the process of practice. It's just that today's society is too complex, the division of labor is too detailed, and new situations and new tricks are emerging one after another. At the speed of human intellectual development, allowing a middle school student to come into contact with all this too early is undoubtedly beyond the mental development level of most middle school students-

Note that we do not rule out that there are a few precocious, gifted middle school students who are capable of this kind of early practice, but for the majority of the general public with a relatively average level of intelligence, we believe that delaying their time in society is undoubtedly the best strategy to be more responsible, more serious, and avoid unnecessary sacrifices!"

At the end of Hu Li's speech, the time prompt bell had already rang for the third time - that is, it was officially announced that time had run out. Hu Li almost stepped on the bell and stopped abruptly, precisely and without breaking the rules of the game.

From the point of view of style, insiders can see that the opposing side plays more loosely than the positive side, and it belongs to the attack from all angles.

Therefore, it is very easy to add or delete on the time, and it is a big deal to find that the time is not up to the time after finishing the expected outline, and you can add another angle, just like building blocks to put together. Each angle takes no more than 20 seconds, making it very easy to handle.

"It seems that both sides are very cautious, and after some conclusions, the point of confrontation has been delineated to a very small range. Professor Liang of the University of Malaya thought so, writing and drawing on his own paper.

He is one of the most knowledgeable judges today, as he was a professional in leading the University of Malaya debate team in his early years. Most of the judges of other cultural people are professors of the Department of Chinese, poets, and literary scholars.

Another judge, Gao Dasong, a literati in the United States, shook his folding fan lightly and thought while pretending to be forced: "The positive argument is very upright and clumsy, although it has no offensive power, but it emphasizes the benefits of 'social practice' to the fullest, so that the opponent completely gives up the intention of resisting in the aspect of 'benefits of social practice'."

The two sides will only focus on the 'risk of contacting society' and 'whether the benefits outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages' to engage in bargaining games. From this point of view, although the opposing side has a lot of arguments and bells and whistles, the level of arguments on both sides really can't say who is good and who is bad. ”