Feng Jianxiong had already seen that today's game should have been just a passing second.

Therefore, in fact, the most difficult opponent "ontology" may be the judge who pointed at him and asked for fame.

As for the four Xia Da debaters, they are just sending experience, and they are not qualified to be the main body of the BOSS, at best, it is a stage before the transformation.

"I would like to ask you the second argument, I first have a question: Do you think the advantages of the so-called credit card system outweigh the disadvantages, which people are enjoying the benefits? Who is bearing the disadvantages? Is it more beneficial than disadvantageous to the whole society? Or does it also outweigh the disadvantages for consumers? Or do you only have more advantages than disadvantages for financial institutions?"

The first sentence of the greasy middle-aged male judge Chen Jie looked very proud.

Feng Jianxiong is also the existence of old spirits, ghosts and old spirits, of course, he can understand: it seems that after the other party said this, he felt that he was already a public conscience asking for the lives of the poor and stood on the moral high ground.

He even saw Chen Jie inadvertently glance at the CCTV crew's camera.

Feng Jianxiong took a breath and didn't talk nonsense at all: "Of course, there is no doubt that the benefits to society, consumers and financial institutions outweigh the disadvantages. ”

When Chen Jie heard this answer, his eyes lit up with excitement, and he immediately put on a compassionate fighter posture: "Very good, you think it's all beneficial, thank you for your answer." But in my opinion, I am afraid that the biggest beneficiaries are banks and other financial institutions.

Isn't the reason why banks are so rampantly peddling credit cards so wildly that even people who have no job or income can get eight out of ten cards behind this? Behind this unscrupulous expansion, aren't the people who are really vulnerable to harm those ordinary poor people who are irrational and do not have enough social experience to temper themselves?

What do you think of the weight between the 'profits' of banks and the 'disadvantages' of consumers who suffer because of the seduction and temptation of banks? Is it true that the benefits of banks outweigh the disadvantages of consumers?

Feng Jianxiong sneered imperceptibly.

His guesses were all successful, and this judge was the kind of idea of brushing up his reputation.

"Judge Chen, I think your logic is very confusing, so there is a sentence I have to give you - when discussing social issues, any sentence structure that does not ask if there is one, but directly asks why, is a hooligan.

You just asked me if I think credit card spending is more beneficial than harmful to all walks of life, and I've already told you my opinion, yes, and you, I don't think it's -- but you don't even debate this disagreement, just assume a point of view that you think 'the benefits outweigh the disadvantages for the banks, and the disadvantages outweigh the benefits for the consumers,' and then ask me why, what do you think -- is this still a debate competition? Have you given me a chance to give my opinion on the first question?"

Chen Jie's question is actually very insidious.

In fact, the team that stood on the right side in history stepped on the pit in this place because of its lack of experience, and finally led to a big collapse of the situation, and was beaten by the opponent and lost the game.

Because as long as the positive side is careless and does not directly break Chen Jie's conspiracy of "don't ask if it is, just ask why", then we can only talk about "I admit that the disadvantages do exist, but that is only a problem for a very small number of people, in a very low proportion, so the advantages outweigh the disadvantages in the mainstream".

However, as soon as such words are spoken, they are immediately attacked by political correctness.

Just like the usual words of Professor Qin Huiqin of Qinghua University: Isn't this the tyranny of the majority? If the interests of 10 million people can be sacrificed for the interests of 6.99 billion people on the earth today, then where is the threshold of this high-pressure red line? Will it become the sacrifice of 100 million people for 6.9 billion people tomorrow? In the end, it will become the sacrifice of 3.4 billion people for the sake of 3.6 billion people? What is the difference between the brutality of the united front that always "unites the majority to fight against a small handful" and then constantly divides and draws together?

(Ahem, this Professor Qin is also from the Qinghua History Department, but it has nothing to do with the fictional old man Xia who appeared in the Chang Kaishen case above, so don't cling to it.) Professor Qin has been in a car accident on the Qinghua campus at the end of 16, so let's not comment on the unfortunate people. ）

Feng Jianxiong is almost certain that if this thought is not careful, the other party will definitely go into such a step-by-layer stalking, and finally bite to that step.

Fortunately, he is an old Jianghu, and he understands the basic laws of trolls who are forced to understand dogs with a little experience, so he stepped on the brakes at the beginning.

Chen Jie saw that he couldn't make a plan, so he could only restrain himself a little first, and put aside the point that Feng Jianxiong refused to admit - because he was not sure to immediately use data with Feng Jianxiong to argue that "it is the consumer who suffers, and it is also the consumer who benefits, which is the largest amount of pros and cons", it is better to put it first.

However, Feng Jianxiong did not let him go, and after only two sentences, he took advantage of the situation to fight back:

"And I don't know why the 'respectful' judges had to take the tempo towards bank profits. Is there a direct causal relationship between the gains of banks and the disadvantages of consumers? Why do you exclude the possibility of 'win-win and win-win' as soon as you open your mouth, and force the context into the atmosphere of 'the strong PO harming the weak'? Do you think that the bank's profit itself has the original sin, so whoever is poor is justified, and whoever is miserable is right?"

In just a few words, Chen Jie's rhythmic and sinister intentions were vividly analyzed.

……

In fact, today's judge Chen Jie Chen is also from Qinghua. It's just that because he is not famous, and Feng Jianxiong is in the arena and can't Baidu, so he doesn't know.

That guy was admitted to a university in Hunan in the early 70s, in the late 80s, and then worked as a local civil servant, and after a few years, he was admitted to Qinghua as a graduate student, studied law, and later worked as a commentator in various media, so his eloquence must be a little.

A few years ago, this Chen Jie fabricated sensational news in order to gain a position - at that time, after investigating a few random cases, he wildly said that "10% of female college students in Wuchang sell YIN, and if the escorts are counted as a quarter", he was expelled and his press card revoked on the grounds of "fabricating false news".

It's just that this guy shamelessly plays the bitter card, and builds himself into a "fighter who is killed for the sake of press freedom". Later, somehow it became more famous and mixed up with the Central People's Radio.

Zhao is simply the same as the Mimeng case in later generations - more than ten years later, Mimeng was also > with an article "After an interview (I don't know how it was interviewed, anyway, all pseudonyms can be used on the grounds of protecting privacy), one-fifth of the male college students around him are female votes for women". It's really a double smell for a while, and it complements each other.

If he knew all this, Feng Jianxiong would definitely rather lose the competition today than say a word to this judge Chen.

This kind of mentality may be similar to the expression of the halberd finger angrily reprimanded by some people on station B: "It's because of bad sisters like you in the world that the sisters are misunderstood!"

Feng Jianxiong can also say: "There are mad dogs like you who hype down the three roads and then get 404, so the big Vs who are harmonious are misunderstood! Brother is only harmonious because he is involved in some tall things! It's different from you little yellow dogs!"

However, although Feng Jianxiong didn't know Chen Jie's case records, after the two of them exchanged words and swords on the field for a while, Feng Jianxiong could deduce what kind of person Chen Jie was just by experience.

So he quickly dike the other party's possible disgusting means.

Chen Jie saw that Feng Jianxiong didn't hit the trick at all, and the counterattack was so sharp, he could only immediately adjust his tactics again, arranged the second round of attack, and continued to take out the arguments that he was not sure of to struggle:

"Well, even if we admit that there is no direct causal relationship between the bank's profit and the consumer's disadvantage, and there is no original sin in the matter of profiting itself—then let's look at it from another angle, let's talk about the pros and cons within the consumer group.

As we all know, as you just mentioned, the main benefit of consumers in the credit card system is that many people who have difficulty in capital turnover - and must be rational people - rely on credit cards to relieve the pressure on the capital chain, right? Please answer yes or no. ”

"Yes, but not across the board – the benefits for consumers are mainly in this area, but there's a lot to add. Feng Jianxiong replied both crisply and cautiously.

"Anyway, it's always the economic benefit. Chen Jie spoke quickly and quickly overstepped his responsibilities again, playing hooligan to help Feng Jianxiong misinterpret and summarize it, and then did not give Feng Jianxiong a chance to speak, and directly took a turn, "But what I want to say is that the disadvantages suffered by consumers due to the flood of credit card consumption are far from being measurable by money-

As everyone knows, according to last year's data, there are tens of thousands of credit card fraud crimes in China's criminal justice field every year, which is already the category of crime that has entered the largest number of criminal trials in China; in the field of civil justice, courts across the country currently sentence more than 8 million cases every year, and more than half of them are credit card dispute cases.

If a credit card causes economic crimes committed by a country's citizens and even the number of civil disputes that need to be resolved by using judicial trial resources, it actually accounts for more than half of the country's total, and the harm caused by this system to social order and the country's justice is not great enough? Is it possible to think that Mr. Feng, you think that only the disadvantages that can be measured by money are disadvantages, and those that cannot be counted as money are not disadvantages?

Is the judicial resources spent in these cases equal to the labor hours and salaries of the relevant legal practitioners? Is it that as long as this part of the money is less than the positive pull of credit card consumption on the national economy, do you think that the benefits outweigh the disadvantages?

This is money worship! And I think there are some things that cannot be measured by money! As long as a pattern of behavior leads to a sharp increase in criminal and civil judicial disputes in a country, and even accounts for the mainstream of illegal acts in that country, then no matter how much money benefits this model brings, it will do more harm than good!"

Thankfully, there is no time limit for the judges, but only for the debaters. Otherwise, Chen Jie may not have a chance to finish his words.

As soon as he finished speaking, he couldn't help but look at the CCTV lens proudly, and seemed to feel that he was glowing all over.

"Hmph, Lao Tzu asked for the people's life again. If this kind of talk is broadcast, it will still hit the face of Feng Jianxiong, who has been in the limelight recently, and we don't have to be regarded as a 'public conscience' again, and those commentators who sing against Ren Dacang and sing about the decline of housing prices may not be as fast as my fans. ”