"Jobs is such a stylish and individualistic person, and he is so despicable and shameless by him!Unforgivable!" As Feng Jianxiong finished speaking, Qiao Zhiya, the most brainless debater in the Jinling team, was furious in her heart, but it was a pity that she had no chance to speak for the time being.

"What an uncomfortable way of playing! How can this guy talk about those details of the fly camp dog Gou so righteous and awe-inspiring, as if every detail is harmful? But he can't find an attack point to refute, so aggrieved!"

Subsequently, the cross-attack and defense confrontation between the two sides, Luo Lida and Tian Haimo, also ended in a similar tactical atmosphere.

Although Tian Haimo's eloquence is weaker than Feng Jianxiong's, he failed to continue to widen the gap in this link. However, Jinling University did not feel uncomfortable at all, and it did not diminish in the slightest.

After seven or eight minutes of pain, the competition finally entered the free debate stage - according to the rules, after entering the free debate stage, there is no need to answer the opponent's difficult questions one-on-one.

Many times, those teams who are not open-minded enough and dare to go head-to-head like to use the tactic of "you hit yours, I fight mine" after entering the free debate session. When you can't answer the other person's question, you immediately change the subject.

Here in Jinling University, Qiao Zhiya, who has been holding back for a long time and is the best at singing high-pitched arguments, and Tian Naqian, the fourth debater, saw that the main force Meng Dana seemed to be still thinking, and they couldn't wait to open their mouths to support the field first with the name of righteousness, so as not to be cold.

This is not to blame them for being impulsive, it is really Feng Jianxiong's style of play, and they have scrapped the argument of "the benefits of smartphones" that they have prepared too much before the game. If they don't say this, they won't have anything to say, and they won't have enough time to speak for the game.

Why fight on the enemy's home turf? Pull the arena back, of course.

This is the simple idea of these girls at Jinling University.

"Today, the opponent's defense friend has been talking about the flaws in the technical details of smart phones, and what is due to the high requirements for the battery, which may force manufacturers to take risks in design, leaving potential safety hazards. What's the increased risk of security and privacy breaches because it's smarter — and what are the minor glitches that don't go wrong?

What we are going to talk about today is that the pros outweigh the disadvantages! Not that there are no disadvantages! Can the opponent talk about the risks, can you cite some examples to prove that there are any cases where a smartphone battery explosion killed people or caused a fire? Or how much damage was caused by a safety leak?"

"Compared to the many functions, uses, and conveniences that can be achieved with smartphones. Compared with these great interests that make the whole society run more efficiently, the small drawbacks that the opponent's defense friend said are simply insignificant! Therefore, can the opponent's defense friend be more generous, talk about the overall situation, talk about the macro situation, and don't bark at the sun and sit in the well and watch the sky!

The two girls sang and harmonized, and Yu Meiqin on the side of the division and brigade resisted a little and gave Feng Jianxiong a time difference to ease his breath. In just two minutes, the laymen in the audience who did not know the truth were quite shaken by the "macro atmosphere" of Jinling University.

Of course, professional judges are not among them.

Of the five judges, at least four clearly recognized Feng Jianxiong's rigorous and excellent style of play.

"The key to Feng's style of play lies in the four words 'comparative advantage', which are really brilliant and difficult to refute. It is estimated that he will fight back sharply soon. Poet Yu Qiuyu and other judges thought.

Sure enough, after buying some time through Yu Meiqin, Feng Jianxiong, who had cleared the opponent's attack point, opened fire again:

"I have to tell my opponent that all arguments that do not focus on comparative advantages and talk about the benefits of something are hooligans. Therefore, the repetition and emotional exaggeration of the opponent's defense friend just now seems meaningless to me at all.

It is also possible for a corrupt criminal to have done practical things for the people in his work, although his motive may have been to rejoice in his achievements.

A ** criminal may also be particularly righteous to his friends, and he is a guy with three views of 'brothers like siblings and women like clothes' in life, so he makes such a rash.

A robber and a thief may be a filial son at the same time, because he has no ability to support his parents, wife and children.

However, does all this mean that these people are not bad people? Aren't they 'doing more harm than good' to society? Obviously not!

So why can we make such a judgment?

It is precisely because of the small favors and contributions made by these prisoners that they may not be insignificant in terms of 'quantity', but in terms of 'quality', we have to admit that these contributions can also be made by most other people in society, so these meager advantages are not unique to them.

And the social harm they bring is something that only a very small number of people will do, so these people are judged to do more harm than good and must be severely punished.

Today, the opponent's defense friends kept saying that they were holding the outline prepared before the game, and wanted to draw a big pie for us, paint a bright future, and a grand blueprint.

However, we have repeatedly emphasized that although smartphones can do so many things and provide so many conveniences, we should ask ourselves whether these things are 'only' smartphones that can do, and there is no other branch of the company? If traditional mobile phones and computers can also do most of these things, then these overlapping parts should not be counted in the 'benefits' of smartphones to society.

Of course, we are all reasonable, and if there are one or a few of the 'harms of smartphones' that we have just raised, the opponent's defense friend can say, 'This is not only the harm of smartphones, but also traditional mobile phones and personal computers, then we will accept it with an open mind' -- but, is there any? So far, I have not seen any such cases cited by the opponent's defense friend. I'm always looking forward to you finding out and making the truth clearer. ”

slapped him hard, and knocked all the tactics of singing high and thin mud back to their original shape, as if they were naked.

The four team members of Jinling University suddenly fell into a short period of sluggishness.

This debate topic has suddenly changed from a high-profile mode of fighting a platoon and a cannon to a high-profile mode of singing and singing, to a hand-to-hand grappling and a scalpel-style precision strike.

And this is precisely the weakness of the Jinling University team in the past fifteen years - if you have seen the style of Jinling University, you know that this team likes to play platoon artillery layer by layer, pretend to have a grand pattern, and stand on the commanding heights of Hongguan to look down on the enemy.

But Feng Jianxiong's tactics used a precise and deadly seven-inch trick to pull the battle back to the detailed account of "comparative advantage"-

You want to sing a high-profile talk about the general trend? Talk about the! What you said about the benefits of smartphones, my brother has admitted them! But these arguments have no direct causal relationship with the judgment that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages or the advantages outweigh the disadvantages!

Brother only bites one point: that is, these benefits are not unique to smartphones, and the disadvantages that Brother has just carefully prepared can be guaranteed to be exclusive to smartphones.

As a law student, I have always had a kind of literacy.

That is, when looking at the problem, we should start from the "first, there is a subjective motivation for XXX. Secondly, the act of XXX was objectively carried out. Again, and judging from the results, the fact that XXX is harmful. Finally, there is a direct causal relationship between XXX's actions and the fact of XXX's harm".

To kill your opponent, you never need to make an even breakthrough on all four points.

As long as you identify the key point from one point, strike quickly, completely kill you, and never turn over.

It's like a lancet that hits the door of life, the blood is not seen, and the enemy is dead.

This makes Jinling University very uncomfortable.

Of course, if someone can stand on God's perspective and look down on all beings, they can also see that there is still something to be done in this game.

Because smart phones do have many unique benefits that traditional mobile phones, PCs, and even the two can't do together.

Anyone who knows how to do it can even mention that "because smartphones use smart terminals with personal identification to do operations that were originally done by PCs, smartphones can help humans develop content-pushing artificial intelligence technology based on personal preferences, which is of great significance to the progress of human science and technology."

This point, if it can be raised, is definitely "the only benefit of smartphones at this stage, and cannot be replaced by any other hardware model".

There are at least a dozen more examples of the same that can be said. If you take it all to the table, it's completely possible to turn the game back.

Unfortunately, the problem is that the four members of Jinling Normal University are all liberal arts students.

Their mastery of cutting-edge technology is simply pitiful.

Before the competition, these people had made up their minds to put out a row of artillery and sing a high-profile song, and they had never thought about it at all about the details of the path of technological development.

If they are asked to talk about the hard science fiction debate of "why some artificial intelligence can only develop rapidly by relying on intelligent mobile phones", they can only cry out in vain: "The concubine can't do it!"

Therefore, the offensive battlefield of "the unique advantage of smartphones" was almost completely abandoned by the Jinling University team.

The rest can only be on the defensive battlefield of "the unique disadvantages of smart phones", resisting the points raised by the division and brigade one by one, trying to find out that "these disadvantages are not unique enough".

The four team members of Jinling University are all looking forward to Meng Dana, the number one main force and known as the most intelligent and adaptable in the school, to come up with some shocking rebuttals.

Unfortunately, he couldn't do it either.

The opponent's layout is too leaky.

"The technical safety risk caused by the bottleneck of battery technology? It seems that this problem does not exist in traditional mobile phones and PCs......

"It can't be modularly assembled and upgraded, resulting in a waste of having to replace the mobile phone every year once it is outdated, and quickly updating the whole machine......

Point after point, after a short period of resistance, was abandoned, and no point could be stacked to three rounds.

On the scoreboard of the judges, the brushes and brushes are flying, recording the scoring points of the division team one by one, and the lost points of the Jinling University team one by one.

"How is it possible? How can the other party be so strong? Why do you have such a talent and go to the spicy chicken school like Normal University? Normal University must have cheated! It can't be that you have taken a huge entrance scholarship to induce poor geniuses to give up a prestigious school and study a bad school? This must be the case!" The four members of the Jinling University team always had this kind of thought lingering in their minds.