Feng Jianxiong got up and cleared his throat.

This is not the first time he has spoken today. Just now, when the other party asked a question in the second debate, he answered a few questions. However, at that time, his strategy to lure the enemy deeper had not yet been fully laid out, and it was not considered to be carried out on the home field he chose. So he can only ask for no fault, but he can't chase and fight.

Now that "noon has arrived", it is time for him to open the whole audience.

"Opponent three debaters, I want to ask you a question - just now you gave the examples of Huang XX sacrificing himself to block the gun's hole and Dong XX sacrificing himself to blow up the bunker, trying to prove that 'food and clothing are not a necessary condition for talking about morality, because some people can even give up their lives directly to achieve some noble goals, let alone just lack food and clothing', right?"

Feng Jianxiong's questioning tone was calm and calm, and when he said this, he paused slightly for a second.

Everyone knows that this question has not been raised, but only the first half of the question has successfully aroused the deep thinking of the judges and the audience.

Everyone felt that this boy's tone was very stable, and there was an inexplicable confidence that made the other party feel that "you have been tricked".

The third debater of the Academy of Mathematical Sciences is a tall and thin inch-headed boy named Qin Mingren. When he was asked by Feng Jianxiong like this, he actually had a chill down his spine being targeted by the sinister fox, and he couldn't help but search in his mind: "I...... There's nothing wrong with the example I'm gating, is there? Is there any loophole he's targeting?"

Qin Mingren suddenly felt a little remorseful.

In fact, when he and his teammates were rehearsing before the game, they didn't want to mention those too extreme examples. Because everyone knows: although those suicidal warriors are very righteous, they really have nothing to do with "lack of food and clothing".

Mainly because Feng Jianxiong had arranged Fu Yiming's answer before, using the rhetoric of "Yan Hui/Du Fu/XXX is not absolutely not well fed", the idea of the Academy of Mathematical Sciences was circled.

Except for Bo Yi Shuqi, the people of the Academy of Mathematical Sciences really can't cite a few other extreme examples of starving to death directly for morality. In addition, Fu Yiming's style of play repeatedly relied on the idea of "food and clothing threshold" to change everything, and he was almost a scoundrel, which aroused the impetuousness of the people on the side of the Academy of Mathematical Sciences, so they had to temporarily use those extreme examples of "sacrificing their lives for righteousness" to secretly change the concept and chase after them.

Their logic is roughly like this: In order to practice righteous deeds, these "people with lofty ideals" can not even want their lives, can they still be afraid of not having enough food and clothing?

But now that Feng Jianxiong is so confident, is there a dug pit waiting for him?

Qin Mingren hesitated, but took a steady and conservative response: "We don't mean to make a judgment on which is greater, 'we have to talk about morality if you don't have enough food and clothing' or 'sacrifice your life for righteousness'. But in principle, I think that these two behaviors can be compared horizontally in terms of difficulty. ”

All of this is a long story, but in fact, even the mental activity belt answers, it only takes twenty or thirty seconds.

Feng Jianxiong saw that the opponent's aura was suppressed and he didn't dare to resist directly, so he continued: "Okay, even if I don't care about the rights and wrongs of the two concepts of 'willing to sacrifice one's life for righteousness' and 'you can talk about morality without food and clothing'. I just ask you, can you prove that in the examples of sacrifice you mention, the motivation or motivation that drives those righteous people to make the decision to sacrifice their lives is morality?"

As soon as this sentence was asked, the host Su Qin's eyes suddenly lit up.

For the first 20 minutes of the day, he was so bored that he fell asleep.

In his eyes, this kind of freshman competition between colleges is simply an amateur farce.

However, Feng Jianxiong's question made him feel a sense of danger of the beast's sense of smell awakening.

This topic has been around for seven or eight years, and no one has ever thought of asking it from this angle: "Brother doesn't talk to you about whether those people can do good deeds in desperate situations, but only ask you if they can talk about morality in desperate situations." ”

"It's kind of interesting, but hopefully this square argument will bring a new creative twist to this old topic. If this kind of person goes to play Go, no matter how good his chess skills are, he definitely has the potential to create a genre. Other details, which are all 'micro-operations' that can be industrialized and mass-produced like sticks, are worthless. ”

In Su Qin's heart, he couldn't help but raise his evaluation of Feng Jianxiong.

The second person in the audience who was alert and amazed was not the other judges, but Yu Meiqin, an audience from the law school.

"Brilliant plan! This is to start with the deduction of the paradox of the unity of subjectivity and objectivity in criminal law! Why didn't I think of this trick!"

It's a pity that the debaters of the Academy of Mathematical Sciences who were asked by Feng Jianxiong, and even the other melon-eating viewers present, did not notice the trick in this question.

Only Su Qin and Yu Meiqin in the audience saw Feng Jianxiong's intentions, and they were really lonely as snow.

So, the opposing side of the three arguments, Qin Mingren, bravely stepped on it.

"Those righteous men sacrifice their lives for righteousness and do righteous deeds, of course, on the basis of morality. Is there any doubt about that? I think it's self-explanatory, and it doesn't need to be proven. I believe that everyone present will agree. ”

Hearing the other party's answer, Feng Jianxiong finally showed a faint smile.

Just like before he was reborn, when he successfully set up the other party in court.

Finally got the shot.

"Friend of the other party, please put away your self-explanatory self-explanatory first—well, according to your logic, is it true that as long as a person has done a good thing from the results of his actions, then his motives must be good?

Isn't that the same as a murderer who accidentally kills another terrorist is a good person? A pesticide factory operator who originally wanted to sell counterfeit medicines, but because the fake pesticides he sold were accidentally used to commit suicide and failed, then the act of selling counterfeit drugs is moral? Isn't that ridiculous?

Feng Jianxiong retorted one after another, which made Qin Mingren finally a little flustered.

"You...... You're deliberately giving extreme examples. How can those people with lofty ideals that I just mentioned be compared with these people who 'do good things with bad intentions'? You are insulting the sages!"

Feng Jianxiongyun smiled lightly:

"Don't be impatient, whether it is an insult to the sages has its own public opinion, and there is no need for the opponent's debater to judge. The question I just asked just now just wanted to prove that the so-called objective good deeds do not mean that the subjective motivation is good. Even if the subjective motivation is good, this motivation is not necessarily based on the constraints and drives of the moral code of conduct.

Failure to admit this will lead to the ridiculous situation I have just enumerated. So, I would like to ask the opposing party, do you admit the basic judgment that 'behavior is not equal to motive, and motive is not equal to morality'?"

The three debaters of the Academy of Mathematical Sciences rolled their eyes wildly, and they couldn't help but look at the other three teammates.

However, when the other three teammates saw him looking over, they all pretended to look at him left and right, but did not see him.

Obviously, these people didn't know how to refute Feng Jianxiong's strange and abrupt tricks.

It actually starts from the logical relationship between behavior, motivation, and code of conduct.

This debate has been around for eight years, and I have never seen anyone use this way of playing!

Su Qin and Yu Meiqin both stared at the three debates of the Academy of Mathematical Sciences with burning eyes, with expectation and contempt, while the eyes of the other viewers were more complicated.

Qin Mingren couldn't stand this kind of mental pressure that everyone was so interested in, and decided to take a step back and breathe a sigh of relief in a panic: "I...... I...... I admit it!"

"...... Uproar"

The audience was in an uproar!

The debate lasted for 20 minutes, and no matter what the game was, there had never been a case where one of the parties had directly admitted the opponent's argument in its entirety!

Although Feng Jianxiong's current argument is only a small point in this topic that cannot be seen to be compatible with the main debate topic.

But it is already very rare to let the other party directly admit defeat for a while, and it is not easy to win a part.

This paragraph is really wonderful.

"Although I can't understand what the other party is saying, it seems to be very powerful-it is so handsome to be able to make the other party admit defeat directly at one point!"

"What's the name of this handsome guy? Youmu has a classmate in class 4? Ahhhh

Well, the mantra of "hang big and say" commonly used between boys when they are eager to ask questions, when it comes to a group of eager girls, it naturally evolves into "talk about the big milk", no problem.

And Weng Dechen, who was sitting in the audience, was as pale as ashes at the moment, and he felt incredibly hallucinating.

In his eyes, he is a little white-faced wastewood who is so thin-skinned that he blushes when he talks to his sister, and he still has this strength?

Although Yu Meiqin is optimistic about him, shouldn't it be because Yu Meiqin thinks he is handsome that he misjudged?

How can this little white face have such good eloquence and acuity? How dare he have eloquence? How can he be equipped with eloquence?

Weng Dechen's mind was buzzing, just like Mrs. Zhao on "The True Story of Ah Q", trembling and wanting to scold: Do you dare to be surnamed Zhao?

It seems that he felt everyone's ridicule, Qin Mingren, who had just conceded defeat, had a little hard face, and he didn't care about the rules of the game, and after a few seconds of sighing, he tried to get back a little face:

"I just admitted that the other side's argument is true, but I am only admitting that 'action does not equal motive, motive does not equal morality' the general and meaningless sophistry. However, the opponent's defense friend has not been able to prove that in the examples we just cited, 'the motive of those people with lofty ideals is not because of morality'......! Don't be deceived by him! There is a kind of proof that you have reversed, what is the motive of those people with lofty ideals when they sacrifice their lives for righteousness in a desperate situation? If it is not based on morality, what can it be based on?"

Qin Mingren obviously made up these words in a hurry, so he was a little incoherent and reversed.

In fact, he is already one of the top two masters in this freshman class of the Academy of Mathematical Sciences, and the other three teammates have not reacted at this moment.

was supported by his words, and some of the melon-eating viewers of the Academy of Mathematical Sciences, who already felt embarrassed, also suddenly woke up:

That's right, the law school only proves that "not all righteous people in desperate situations do righteous deeds based on morality", but this is still far from "not proving that any righteous people in desperate situations do righteous deeds based on morality"!

On his side, why was he confused by such a sideline that was far from the main debate?

"But even so, the third debate in that law school is really powerful...... "Some girls in the Academy of Mathematical Sciences have begun to think like this.

In the debate competition, you can look at the contestants openly, Feng Jianxiong's posture is so majestic, the girls don't look at it in vain.

"So handsome, tall, talented, sharp, it's so good......"

It's a pity that while everyone was waiting for Feng Jianxiong to answer positively, Feng Jianxiong always just smiled lightly, as if the other party didn't exist at all.

"Hey! Answer quickly! Is it a sneak attack and there is no follow-up move!" Several male viewers from the Academy of Mathematical Sciences began to coax, and the girls around them were hooked by Feng Jianxiong, which was enough to make them unhappy.

Feng Jianxiong still smiled incomprehensibly and contemptuously.

He's waiting.