The above theory was too lofty, and Ma and Sha obviously didn't understand it.

However, as a spraying god, Feng Jianxiong has a way to give simple examples that elementary school students can understand.

"Well, it's my fault, I shouldn't have given too high an example of a high-level industry, so I'll talk about the lower riba people. He shrugged helplessly, thought for a few seconds, and then asked, "Do you usually watch the Internet?"

"Uh...... I've seen Zhu Xian, isn't it lo......" Ma Hesha replied a little unconfidently.

After all, the Internet is still easy to be regarded as lo by the mainstream society, and the evolution of society is also a process of continuous opening up.

"It's nothing, it's normal for the Internet to be in the future, and I'll look at it too. Feng Jianxiong eliminated Ma Hesha's inferiority complex with one sentence, "If you have seen it, I will say it." Let me give you an example. I once used a foreign network APP, well, it is only available in the United States at present, on the Apple phone, you must not have seen it, just listen to my description. ”

The APP mentioned by Feng Jianxiong is, of course, a deception to Ma and Sha, because the United States in 09 does not have the APP he is about to describe.

The example he wants to relay is actually an example he saw in China before he was reborn in his previous life. It's just that he can't confide that he is a reborn, so in the name of crooked nuts, Ma and Sha can't find it anyway.

"In the online text software in the United States, the website was the first to use big data to speak, deciding which books to promote resources and which books to give up, and to fend for themselves. Moreover, because the website likes books with beautiful traffic data, some people go to fake it, but if the fake behavior does not look like the behavior pattern of the normal public, the website algorithm can also be investigated, so as to put those suspected of brushing the books into the cold palace.

I read a book on lawyers and debates – probably because it was more in line with my background and knowledge. But as a cold and noble reader, I won't shout Amway like those babbling babbles, I will only save it first, raise it to 1 million words and then slaughter it.

But one day, I found out that the book I saved was too J, and I wanted to insult the author, but after reading the inside story disclosed by the author, I gave up, and I found that he was too legitimate, and I didn't deserve to be insulted.

The reason why the book was wronged and ended for the sake of dignity is this: on that website, first of all, the APP has a façade design, that is, when the number of paid fans of a book exceeds about 200, there will be a step of dozens of times. For example, if only 50 people have paid for a book, the app will show that there are really only 50 followers. 100 people have paid, and 100 are displayed - the number of people evaluated here is the number of people, regardless of the amount, that is, a person gives a league leader or only 1 yuan, it is counted as a fan.

However, when the number of fans of a book exceeds 200, it will suddenly display '0.6/0.7 thousand' followers, and a book with 1379 orders will display '71,000' fans at the foreground - you understand, that is, when the number of fans exceeds a certain threshold, the algorithm will automatically suddenly step and give away about 30 times the number of fans in real times, which can make the account look better.

The reason why it is designed is to take into account the good value of the book and the ease of selling the IP, but at the same time it is not easy to goof. Because if a book only has five or ten followers, then every fan author may know each other, or know each other in the QQ group.

The famous American psychologist and Homo sapiens research experts have researched that our 'Homo sapiens' can only maintain 200 acquaintances in their lives, and the Neanderthals who were destroyed by Homo sapiens can't even do 200, only 50 strong social relationships.

Therefore, if a book has more than 200 paying fans, the possibility of fans getting to know each other and colluding with each other is gone, so setting more than 200 will automatically send 30 times the number of front-end displays, which is a subtle and in-depth anthropological design.

However, the book I chased was miserable - its positioning was too cold, and its readers were all vicious, cold, and people who didn't like to express themselves, and liked to make a fortune and fatten up for 1 million words. At that time, before it hit the shelves, there were more than 10,000 people in the collection of that book, and it was not forcibly pushed and the three Mississippi rivers. Other works similar to its collections, clicks, and data, there should be two or three hundred normal real fans, and there are three or five hundred good ones, and after passing the threshold of '30 times the display amount will be given away for nothing after more than 200 fans'.

And that book, because of the 10,000 more than 80 people who have rewarded it, belongs to the threshold range of the algorithm that 'because there are too few fans, it is possible that fans are all author numbers or know each other', so the system did not give away that 30 times in vain, so it obediently only displayed more than 80 fans.

Then, a group of crazy pigs on the land of jealous pigs went to bite and report, saying that this book was brushed - because the number of fans is more than 100 times lower than that of peers, why is there 10,000 receipts for such fake data?

Actually, the official knows, there is no check of more than 100 times, but the difference is two or three times, the reason why it is two or three times worse, maybe because of the brush, or maybe because the readers of this subject are too yin and unwilling to express themselves before 1 million words, so it is considered by big data to be a 'zombie fan of the brush'.

However, since there are so many reports from the public, and you can't take it for giving 30 times the powder for nothing, let's treat it coldly - this book is forever sealed and strongly pushed, and the three Mississippi rivers.

Then, the author of that book wrote hundreds of thousands of words to reveal these insider stories, which is too J. And when I was too J, I said it confidently, and I have ever seen the most righteous Tai J in the online literature industry - it later turned out that after the book was put on the shelves, there were five or six hundred orders in more than 10,000 receipts, and later it rose to 20,000 or 30,000 and more than 1,300 after receiving it, which shows that the collection is real.

However, who made the target group of that book generally yin, generally unwilling to express big data, and generally paid for 50 yuan to subscribe after it was put on the shelves, but before it was put on the shelves, the probability of even rewarding 1 yuan to prove that he was not a zombie fan was at least 3 times lower than that of Xiaobaiwen?

Then, before crossing the line of life and death of 'judging whether it can be three Mississippi River, enough to get two or three hundred rewards', he was squeezed by the public's criticism and public opinion, and he could only be killed and made an example.

Of course, in this specific example, no individual consumers are at fault, they just put it together as a whole, and under the big data, it seems that 'compared with Xiaobaiwen's readership, the probability of these people being zombie fans is 3 times higher'. If I want to be wrong, in fact, the author of that book is even more wrong and outrageous.

Because on that online article platform in the United States, 99% of writers, even if they are great gods, will pay their respects at the end of the chapter every day, saying, 'There are still a few tickets left to explode the chrysanthemum in front, and a few votes are still spent by the people behind, although it has been temporarily stabilized, but the advantage is not obvious', or 'Ice and snow 720 degrees fruit body Lu Oujin gold somersault for reward'. It's not even that the poorer you are, the more you ask, but the more you beg the greater.

However, the damn author has never asked for anything at all, so he only rewarded the public with 80 fans - and his last book was also because of the zombie fan problem caused by the red envelope function just launched and the red envelope was sent out with a weak heart, so he asked to see how many living people there were, so he made up enough 300 fans in advance to avoid being misidentified, although it was a mistake this time. In fact, think about it, if he didn't have a weak heart that time, he might not even survive the previous book.

In fact, now that I think about it, those gods are also forced by big data, because the big data collected is the data in an environment where everyone worships votes and asks for rewards, so they think that is normal data, and when they encounter someone who has not asked for it, it seems that the ratio of his data votes to the number of fans is particularly low, as if brushed. Therefore, after reaching a certain high position, do you think those people really want to sell their dignity? No! It's just that the algorithm of big data has determined that so, and you don't ask for it, and the proportion is obviously several times lower than that of others, and you are fake. Everyone can only sell their dignity even more.

In a world where everyone shouts with a megaphone, the one who sings with the real voice becomes mute. In a world where everyone takes pictures with beauty, those who take pictures without makeup become perverts. But instead of blaming the world, we should educate everyone to buy megaphones and beauty phones, which are the positive, high-spirited solutions. If you realize that singing with your real voice is wrong, you should immediately apologize, then stop the song you are singing and start another game with a different device.

Therefore, the people who fatten up and then slaughter for 1 million words, they don't have books to read, they all ask for themselves. They have books to read, in fact, they have to thank Xiaobai, because when their interests are just the same as Xiaobai's, Xiaobai is willing to express them when they are not on the shelves, so that the proportion of zombie fans identified by big data is not so high, so the book survived. They just rubbed Xiaobai's contribution and scolded Xiaobai. If they have completely different interests from Xiaobai, and no one helps them express them, then it is self-inflicted to find no books all over the world and read them.

Based on this example, we can even imagine that in the future, literature, film and television, and even other cultural and creative industries, catalyzed by big data, will have such a development: early fans of each work may be able to get content completely free, while later fans should be charged a high identification tax. Because the first 1,000 points of a book may be paying for the identification of labor, and their labor pay is higher than his harvest, and the people who come in to read it after reading it are just pure consumers, and have no labor attributes at all, shouldn't they be charged a high price?

This is just like after a new brand of mobile phone comes out, the person who buys the first generation of the machine may be just a guinea pig, but the reality is that the price they buy is more expensive than the consumer after the future brand matures, is this fair? Those who expect 'PS4 consoles to wait two years after the launch, and then buy them when they fall', should be slaughtered and stabbed so that they can buy them at a higher price than when they first went on sale, and the later they buy everything, the more expensive they become (provided that there is no increase in productivity and a decrease in average cost due to the progress of technology, and those industries that do not use human creativity as the bottleneck of productivity still cannot replicate this path, and can only take the traditional industry to reduce prices later and more, which is not in the discussion)

Provided, of course, that future anti-piracy efforts can be done well. It is possible that we can count on the extinction of all traditional replicable electronics, and that technology and law will only allow new hardware to be left with blockchain encryption to produce copies to replace today's smartphones.

I'm going to beat these honest people now, but it's good that after many years, society has developed and evolved, and it's better for them to be discriminated against by society after being identified as 'zombie fans, not real people' by the intelligent social system. I just told them more than ten years in advance that in the future big data society, the machine will treat the person who can't shout as a zombie.

Maybe we don't have to go to the police station to issue a certificate to prove that your mother is your mother, but they have to prove that people are human beings on the algorithm of the value network. ”

——

I am a strong supporter of the website, so I would like to warn all book lovers not to promote my book on third-party platforms, especially forums.

I also saw that some people promoted the book through other websites, and the mobile phone numbers of the families of the perpetrators were printed with sexually transmitted disease advertisements and posted on some of the most smelly public toilets in China.