Most of the characters in the original book do not have a specific division of strength (which is very different from the clear strength level of the online article). Basically, except for Deng, Fu, and Ge, who can barely distinguish between high and low, the strength of other people is basically roughly divided into three levels, or relatively vague.

1. A member of the Order of the Phoenix, an Auror, and a Death Eater. Of course, a very small number of people can be considered slightly stronger than the first echelon. Snape, Bella, and Moody, for example, are either experienced and battle-hardened, or gifted (yes, Snape), or have learned some advanced magic from their masters, and they are not many of them, they are all elites.

2. Ordinary wizards, senior Hogwarts students, etc., all living beings, the general public.

3. The number of crappy wizards such as Hagrid and others (those who appeared in the second grade and participated in the crash course in charms), junior students, etc., cannot be determined, so there should be a small number (I guess)

It is difficult to classify these three categories in detail because of the lack of combat records. For example, Aberforth defeated Lukewood, but neither of them had a record of fighting with others, so they could only return to the first echelon, and Snape basically didn't use his real strength throughout the whole process, and the limited number of times he fought with others, and they were all unable to kill or attack, so we can only peek at the leopard in some clips. Moody's results during World War I are not clear whether they were completed independently or as a team, and it is also uncertain. Basically, the determination of their strength depends on personal thoughts

Deng Fogger three, I personally think it is easier to divide, because there are clear wins, losses, draws and a lot of descriptions. It's possible that the three Snape will be entangled, otherwise it will be a move of seconds.

Personally, I think

Grindelwald was at the lowest level, as he was defeated by Dumbledore in 1945 with the Elder Wand (their passions are not discussed). Voldemort, however, was able to draw with Dumbledore in possession of the Elder Wand.

Voldemort and Dumbledore are basically evenly matched, but I think that with Dumbledore not using the Elder Wand (neither of them has pets, and a phoenix can save them from dying once), Voldemort may be 'skilled'. If Voldemort gets the Elder Wand, it is possible to force Dumbledore, but it is more likely that Voldemort has the absolute upper hand.

In terms of strategy, Dumbledore must be far ahead, basically kite Voldemort throughout the whole process, and hang a debuff on him after death, with the help of a portrait ultra-remote operation.

In terms of magic research and development, I think Voldemort's invention should be more lethal, and he definitely doesn't study the other twelve uses of dragon blood, unless it is related to immortality and immortality. Dumbledore's research was more extensive and popular.

――――――――――――――――――――

The plot is about to start adding original plots, I don't know if you can accept it, I don't want to write too badly, add some other things. It's basically an extension of the original work.,There are probably no more than 5 private magic.,It's all about issues such as the reason for the signing of the International Secrecy Law.,Things between wizards in different regions (otherwise the background of NB is set in vain). Personally, I feel that it is written very - very much, very anti-- human beings, there is a kind of - clan - righteous tendency, middle two, rhapsody, acceptance-pure. If you don't let it be sent at that time (I don't know, I haven't asked the editor, it's okay to write a vague point), then the battle is over, and the summary finale will be completed.

Hey, it's violent, and it's a bit of a mess. Whether you believe it or not, I don't believe it anyway (it's not a routine!)