This Zhu Gaofeng, in his forties, is fair, straight, and speaks concisely and sonorously. It gives a unique convincing force.

After a brief self-introduction, combined with the prepared PPT, some famous application examples of this discipline in reality are highlighted. Then, using the previous text comparison examples of Deng Hai and Deng Zheng's articles with "Shooting the Condor", some general explanations of specific analysis methods are given.

However, many of the people here today are bigwigs in the academic world, in addition to the literary circle and the entertainment circle, there are not a few people who are engaged in natural sciences and understand modern and contemporary logical sciences, and a few of them have been in contact with similar identification disciplines, so Zhu Gaofeng has just finished explaining, and doubts have already risen.

The doubts on the scene mainly focused on three points:

First, whether it is Deng Hai's several early essays or Deng Zheng's middle school essays, the themes are too different from those of "The Legend of the Condor Heroes", the content narrated and the things reflected have very little overlap, and the comparability of language is relatively low;

Second, the number of words in the selected text samples is too small, Deng Zheng's three essays add up to about 4,500 words, and Deng Hai's eight essays are less than 10,000, so the error of such a comparison result is too large to be convincing;

The third is that "The Legend of the Condor Heroes" is a mature text published publicly, and there are editors in the middle. Habitual changes on the part of editors will inevitably reduce the individuality of the text's language, and this must be taken into account.

In short, after listening to his exposition, the opinions of most of the people present are quite unanimous: don't follow me to fix all these things that are not there, your previous conclusion that "Deng Hai's text is more like "Shooting the Condor" than Deng Zheng's text is unscientific and untenable!

On the online live broadcast platform, the relevant doubts are also boiling in an instant:

"It's really enough! I used to think that Si Haoran and Ying Zhe didn't care about success or failure, and their pursuit of the truth was almost paranoid. It is of great significance to the current Chinese society. Si Haoran, Ying Zhe and others questioned Jin Liang. It's reasonable, it's not framing. is pursuing the truth, not trying to stink anyone, and Jin Liang himself has never spoken ill of each other. In this matter, the straightforwardness of Si and Ying, and the elegance of Mr. Jin Liang all made me admire. However, now it seems that Jin Liang is indeed elegant, but some people may not be really good! Jin Liang has already proved beyond doubt in the previous verification, on the other hand, Si and Ying. Until now, he has come up with such insincere and flawed evidence to fool people into frying leftovers, is it interesting? Really be a blind man for the people of the whole country?!"

First of all, this Zhu Gaofeng only found such a small number of places, but unfortunately there are countless places in the whole article and book, and using these to prove it is equivalent to looking at a black piece on the person and saying that this person is black. In addition, it cannot be ruled out that Jin Liang and his father, Mr. Deng Hai, have lived for a long time and influenced each other. If Jin Liang has admiration for his father, he will often imitate some of his father's words, which is very common in the literary world. What's more, Mr. Deng Hai is said to have been a Chinese teacher at Jinliang High School. The impact is not small. So it can only be said that this evidence is nothing. ”

"I didn't know how to play judicial linguistics before, and I was bluffed. It turned out to be such a thing! This Zhu Gaofeng has just said so many cases, but basically none of them are from the literary circle. What anonymous letter serial killer, 30 million extortion and kidnapping suspicion, London terror...... I'm wondering if different texts should sometimes be treated differently. Can genre literature and fantasy literature really be as 'birthmark obvious' as everyday letters? Are there any classic cases of exemplification by famous literary artists? I think we should set a precedent to prove the existing works of famous artists, come up with evidence from the classics, and then talk about the ghostwriting of Jin Liang. It's too accidental, too amateurish, and completely unconvincing to say a few keywords that are likely to be their own subconscious preferences!!"

“…… It's really disgusting. I saw a lot of people talking about logic. Logic and evidence complement each other, logic without evidence is to pull a few eggs, of course, logic does not work, evidence is also a few eggs. To determine whether a person is a bad person or not, it is necessary to have done bad deeds. No matter how good Zhu Gaofeng, Ying Zhe, and Si Haoran's logic is, and how bad Jin Liang's logic is, if there is no evidence, it is a fart.

Besides, what is evidence, what can rule out other possibilities is evidence, and evidence that is doubtful in itself cannot be called evidence.

Seeing Zhu Gaofeng's seemingly scientific analysis, it is actually the same as "you dare not openly participate in the verification that you are fake", it can only be used to disgust people, or use seemingly scientific methods to disgust people.

There are prerequisites for any scientific analysis, but can linguistic analysis really work for fathers and sons?

Not to mention father and son, two people have lived together for a long time, and they have influenced each other in behavior, language and personality, not to mention father and son. You have a dog since you were a child, and the dog will be influenced by the owner, not to mention the father and son. Adopted children are influenced by their adoptive parents as they grow up. Biological even personality and appearance will be inherited, plus the acquired family education, I think it is not an exaggeration for the son of a normal family to be a copycat version of his father. What can be said that the father's writing frequency in his twenties is occasionally similar to the writing frequency of his son's twenties?

Who dares to pat their chests and say that the way they speak does not have the shadow of their own father? Is it particularly biological?!

Wouldn't your mantra be influenced by your friendly girlfriend?

I really don't like to see this kind of stupid behavior that seems to be like using the principles of quantum mechanics to demonstrate the error of materialist dialectics.

What the grass is, do these people have any hard dishes to prove that Jin Liang is ghostwritten, don't just let the smell smell and smell the fragrance, but it is pot when it is served?!"

……

Faced with extensive doubts about the previous analysis conclusions from the scene to the Internet, Si Haoran and Ying Zhe secretly glanced at each other, and a trace of triumph flashed in their eyes......

When everyone's opinions on the scene were almost expressed, Si Haoran coughed, pulled up the microphone, and said slowly:

"There is one point that I would like to make a supplementary explanation for Professor Zhu here, and I will also shout out for injustice by the way. You can take a closer look at the big screen, in Professor Zhu's analysis report, there is not a word from beginning to end to explain that there is a fit between Deng Hai and Deng Zheng's articles and the text of "The Legend of the Condor Heroes". In fact, according to his analysis report, if only those few essays and essays were to be written, Deng Hai and Deng Zheng, father and son, could basically rule out that they were the authors of "Shooting the Condor"! Of course, let me explain here that in judicial appraisal, it is much easier to exclude than to determine the same. For example, if the same identification is made with highly differentiated DNA, it is only stated that it is 99.99%, but the blood type with very low discrimination can be directly ruled out 100% once it is different. Limited by the current conditions, judicial linguistics follows this principle for the time being. (To be continued......)