Thinking of this, the doorman nodded and said in his heart, "That's fine." The next question is how to convince the others exactly. Although the opening of this passage is not too beautiful, it is at least moving. Because, I was touched by the right side of my neck. All right. Then let's start simulating how he convinces the others. Let me think about it again. Well. I see.

He would probably say that. If you think what I'm saying is right, then please stand up, and if you don't, you can raise your hand. If you don't even raise your hand. Then I don't have much more to say. But, in any case, I can at least believe that there is confidence in what I say.

In other words, I know why people feel this way or that, and I understand why people do it. What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this, in short, as long as everyone works hard. It's going to work out, right? It's just a matter of time.

This is something that anyone can understand. However, I would like to say that this kind of thing can happen, but when it happens, it depends on the environment in which you live, and if you still maintain your independent existence, then we may be different.

In other words, we are the only ones who are independent first. Then, it is possible to chase after that stronger being, and if you don't, everything is in vain. Forming a team is a good thing, and if you have a team, it is equivalent to having a reliance, but the same is equivalent to having a sense of security, and a sense of security can sometimes harm yourself.

The theory is a bit more complicated. If you want to listen, you can make a vote. If you want to, please raise your hand. No need to stand up. If someone doesn't want to, then it's good to leave automatically. Don't be embarrassed to sit either. Okay, let's start voting now, I want to see how many people will.

Ah. This result was really surprising to me, I thought that everyone would basically leave, but I didn't expect so many people to support me. The only person who left was to go to the toilet. Very good. In that case, then I can explain it with confidence. Listen up, everyone.

The reason why I say that there is a bad thing about security is that it tends to make us lazy. In other words, do not seek to improve. If we are already about to be 200 years old, then it is a good choice to rely on a sense of security to get by.

However, after all, most of us are young people who are not even 100 years old. In that case, many of the problems can be explained. What is the meaning of wasting time? People who keep a sense of security in their hands all the time are wasting their time. Because, we are killers, if we can't kill and can't complete the task, then what kind of killers are we?

Also, the killer can give up the mission in order to protect himself. However, this frequency should not be too high. Do you know what I mean? It's okay to come once or twice once in a while, but if you keep doing this, you'll end up being looked down upon by the rich people, and if the rich people look down on you, it's no different than offending the rich people.

At this time, even if you have become a well-known high-level killer, no one will come to save you. Because, there are many killers like you, and if I were a rich man, I would rather choose those who are willing to take risks to carry out their missions than those who only want to protect themselves.

Do you understand what I mean? Still don't seem to understand. It doesn't matter, you don't have to be in a hurry, let alone in a hurry to oppose me. As long as you think about it from a different perspective, you can understand. Actually, it should be considered in this way. Everyone must understand a truth, a rich man will issue a task.

We don't know why, after all, the rich man is not us, and besides, none of us are really rich people, and even if we have a deep friendship with the rich man, it is impossible to know what the rich man really thinks, right?

After all, no one knows what the real idea looks like, except for the publisher himself. So, from this point of view, what is the only place we can please this rich man? not to pursue the reason why he did it, but to make him see a satisfactory outcome.

Only then is a good killer. Because, ah, sometimes, the reason for killing is not visible. Surely the rich man would not be willing to tell anyone but himself.

Because, as long as you tell one person, it is equivalent to telling two people, telling two people means telling ten people, and telling ten people is equivalent to telling hundreds of people. When the number reached hundreds, he could no longer hide his reasons for doing so.

Then, the next thing he will suffer is the bombardment of the media. I'm exaggerating a bit by saying that, but it's not impossible. That is, the probability of such a thing happening is not very high, but if he is a European, it doesn't matter, what if the rich man is not a European, but just an ordinary person?

Isn't that unlucky? So, not happening, and unlikely are two completely different concepts. Nothing that could happen is completely impossible. Unlikely to happen means it will happen. Of course. Everyone will surely say that you don't know the reason, and it doesn't seem good to go and kill people indiscriminately.

Isn't that right? I can say that people who think that way must be right. After all, we are killers. It's a good thing to go on a mission, but if you don't have a brain at all when you go on a mission, such a killer is also the most dangerous. Because, what if the rich man is targeted by other rich people in the end, and someone else specially invites this killer to kill the rich man?

If it were someone else at this time, he might remember that he had cooperated in the past, or even some friendship, and informed the rich man as soon as possible and asked him to flee quickly or something. That's what people are. Although killers mainly kill people, we also have seven emotions and six desires.

However, if that killer doesn't ask anything, doesn't care about anything, doesn't use his brain, and goes to carry out the task when he receives it, it is equivalent to a mobile killing machine. The rich man won't be afraid? If he would, what would he do? The answer is obvious, he will let this killer complete the mission, and then release a new mission, which is to get rid of this killer.

Now, everyone should understand, right? Xiangbi, at this point, no one should oppose me anymore, right? Very good. As long as everyone understands and agrees, then the next problem will be solved. If you don't solve it, it doesn't matter.

I can say it again. It's just that if you want to say it again, it's still a bit troublesome. The best-case scenario is that I feel like it's okay to wait. That said, I hope that those of you who understand can digest each other a little bit and then have a bit of an exchange. In that case, I don't need to explain.

As long as you listen to the conversations between the people on the left and right, you will understand. Can you accept this method? If not, you can raise your hand. If you don't raise your hand, then I'll accept it.

One more point, if you accept it, I hope you will understand it as soon as possible. Because, what I'm going to say next is going to be a lot more troublesome if you can't understand it. Because it's more complicated and profound than the one just now, but that's what you have to understand.

Only then can we understand why it is better for the killer to be independent. If we lose our courage and only have a sense of security, we can indeed live longer, but for the rich people, they will not be satisfied. In other words, a rich man would never raise a killer who is not willing to risk his life to kill desperately at a critical moment.

If you have a killer who can only run for your life, can you still be called a killer? It will only become the laughing stock of others. So, by this time, everyone should understand my plight somewhat, right? I didn't mean to break everyone up. After all, if the huddle can be warmed, then all of us can get together.

Why fight and kill, each for its own sake, right? But the truth is that we can't. Because, our situation is different from everyone else. And one thing, if we could, we wouldn't be able to do these things. If it does, it's troublesome. Because, this kind of thing is not something to be proud of. On the contrary, such things will only make us scramble.

It's also important to be sure that it's good for us to go it alone. Because, only in this way can we improve step by step. Those at the top will have a sense of crisis. These feelings of crisis will prompt them to practice repeatedly or to do tasks.

In this way, our killer organization will also have a good example. Otherwise, as long as you reach a high position, you can be upright and worry-free. So, what kind of people can really be worry-free? Is it the people who can climb up? No. It is a person who has long been in a high position. In other words, we will never have a chance to become the number one killer again in our lifetime.

Of course, being the first killer has the advantages of being the first killer, but there are also corresponding disadvantages, and the biggest disadvantage is that you can't communicate with others at the same level. For example, in the past, companions could have sat together and talked and laughed, but if they really became the number one killer, they considered the entire industry, so they couldn't do that.

This is the law of everything, and at the top, if you can still talk and laugh, even if you are willing, the group of people who support you will not be willing. They're going to replace you. This is human nature, and it is also the difficulties and sufferings that we have to face no matter what. If you don't want to face it, then the best thing to do is to fight it separately.

Because, as long as we are all alone, there will be no one to support us. And as long as we don't huddle. Then all the next problems are easier to solve. Although there will still be some trouble if you want to solve it completely, such troubles are still too simple compared to those things that are not troublesome.

In other words, as long as we have such thoughts, we will not fail, and as long as we do not hold together, we will always have the opportunity to succeed as the number one killer. But if we give up doing so, we will give up all hope, and to debate here today is at best self-defeating.

Therefore, if I think about it from my point of view, I will not let others affect me like this. I don't let people understand myself either. I wouldn't want people to support me. I just want to say what I want to say, and that's the most important thing in the debate.

If you don't have a heart for the common good, then everything is selfish, and the recruited supporters must be selfish, and in the end, you will only kill others and yourself. It's better for these things not to happen.

If it happens, then I will mercilessly kill the leader of the support team, whether or not the rich man sends me a task. Of course. If you kill someone like this, it will definitely be a crime, so I will post this task at my own expense in advance. If someone is willing to help me do it, that's for the best.

But if at the end of the day, no one is willing to help me, then I'm going to kill them completely. And as long as you kill it, everything will become very reliable. Of course. It's better not to have that happen, you know why? It's just going to hurt everyone's peace.

Isn't the atmosphere like that? Everyone fights for themselves, and they don't have to be involved by any forces and teams, as long as everyone does their own things well. It's actually related to the low- and middle-level killers. If we clench our fists, they won't have any chance to rush up.

And as long as they can't rush up, then we old guys will have no successors after they die. And as long as there is no successor, the next thing will happen one after another. I don't want the tragedy to happen again and again, it's enough to happen once.

Because, if it doesn't happen once, it's not good. It's just going to make everyone look down on it, and I don't think it hurts, but I'm not hurt anyway. It's only the best if everybody gets hurt. Of course. There is one more thing that must be affirmed.

This kind of thing should be controlled as much as possible. If we can't control it, then make sure it only happens once. That is, today, you can kill me. I am willing to sacrifice myself for the healthy development of the entire killer industry. ”

Important notice of this site: Please use the free APP of this site, no ads, broken anti-piracy, fast update, members synchronize the bookshelf, please pay attention to the WeChat public account gegegengxin (press and hold three seconds to copy) Download the free reader!!