101 posted after a long time, and a ball of people came to criticize 101's views, what theory is too much research, too many books to read, and not enough to write. The pen "Fun" Pavilion www.biquge.info so 101 specially opened this post to clarify the viewpoint: writing, reading, thinking, and communicating are all important! If they are arranged in order of importance, they are - reading> thinking> writing >Communication. Reading is accumulation, accumulation of material and feelings in the brain. I want to organize and process materials and feelings in my brain and turn them into my own. Communication is about collecting feedback, adjusting deviations, and getting feedback from readers. These four steps are a big cycle, and different stages have different emphasis. For example, when you read enough, it is more important to think and write, rather than stumbling on reading all the time. If you write enough but don't get a big result, you have to stop and start reading more to increase your accumulation. If you read and write enough, but you don't get any grades, then you need to find someone to guide you to see if you don't think enough to understand the true meaning of writing. -----1. Some people accuse 101 of having too many theories and not writing books based on feelings. Answer: Before 101 studied the theory, from 2007 to 2012, a total of 18 books were opened, accumulating 1.5 million words, but none of them signed a contract, and the instructions were not read enough, and the path was deviated, so it is impossible to succeed in writing books based on feelings alone unless the talent is high enough. Then, starting in 2012, 101 began to study the theory, corrected some previous erroneous ideas, and soon signed a contract, which shows that the theory is very useful. 2. Some people accuse 101 of not writing enough and not having a million words to complete. A: People who say this kind of thing are eager to show that they are good and don't take other people's writing experiences seriously. Since 101 was able to sign the contract, there have been 2 million-word completed works, namely "Post-90s Gene Brick Family" and "Demon Dao Jizun", which were also completed carefully in accordance with the outline, and the million-word experience 101 has been experienced, and there is an accumulation in this area. 3. Some people accuse 101 of not being diligent enough, and it should be 5 million words, or even 6 million words, to be qualified for 3 years of full-time. A: Just because you write more doesn't mean you understand more. It does not mean that after success in the future, it will not fall. The foundation is very important, many people are one red and two are fluttering, but they are in a hurry to produce results, and ignore the cultivation of the foundation. I wrote 3.1 million words in three years, a total of 2 million finished books, one 300,000 yuan, one 500,000 yuan, and one 300,000 words in progress -- this amount of practice is sufficient, and no matter how much you write, it doesn't make much sense, it's just repeating some mistakes. 4. List 2 writers who write a lot, but they don't pay attention to theoretical learning, and so far they have wiped out everyone, if I see it, don't get angry with me, I really want to fight back against some people's crooked theories! Come to the starting point to write "The Great Refining Treasure" million-word eunuch, what "Carry the Hundred Herb Garden", anyway, you can rush to the strong push, but it will be pounced on the shelves, there are too many titles, too many vests, I can't remember a lot, the total number of words should be 10 million words, right?

Even if it didn't, it would have been 8 million words. Excuse me, this author has written enough, why is he not a god? Xun Xun: The author of "True Immortals", that book earned him 100,000 yuan, and he wrote 7.6 million words in three years, and he once did well in wireless. At first, I couldn't sign a contract, but then I gritted my teeth and persevered, and finally succeeded. So here's the problem, after writing a book and a book, after 2 books in a row, I haven't written much recently, and I can see it every day in the cabbage group, and occasionally chat a few words. －－－－－－

The above two authors are rewritten, not reread, and not repondered, and there is almost no theoretical foundation. Excuse me, if I 101 keep writing like this, what is the use of writing like this? Give these two people as an example: it is more representative, because they are bored to write, and they did produce some results in a certain book, but then they did not work, 101 believes that after achieving some results, they did not pay attention to theoretical study, resulting in the subsequent deviation, and there was no sustained development and progress. This kind of fire, two and three books, really hurts the author too much, 101 would rather not have this kind of ups and downs, useless!