"Everyone. Pen %Fun %Pavilion www.biquge.info please calm down. Okay? Now we just listen to his explanations, so what's not to do? Is it possible that if we listen more, we will lose a piece of meat? Or if we don't listen, we will die? At most, it will only be a few minutes of delay. What's so bad about that?"

"That's what he said. We're only going to be delayed for a few minutes at most, so we shouldn't die because of those few minutes, right? I don't believe it. I can't accept my ruthlessness. If I could save all of our lives in those few minutes, I'd rather take a gamble. ”

"What's wrong with you? Do you believe this guy just because of his words? You can't believe his nonsense. The two of them are in a gang. I know. They were the lackeys of the targeted monk. They did this to deliberately stop us. ”

"What a mess. Even the lackeys spoke out. Why are you saying this more and more ugly? The present is different from the past. I don't want to hear your nonsense. At the critical moment, let's listen to the kid's explanation. They are in league with us, how can they be lackeys. ”

"You don't know that. They had already taken refuge with the target monk, so in order for the target monk to survive, they asked us to terminate the project. And as long as our plan is terminated, then their boss will survive, and when the time comes, their boss, in a fit of rage, will kill all those who surrender, and the rest of them will survive? ”

In this case, there is some truth. That's trouble. To listen or not to listen. If you don't listen, you can surrender now. But if you listen. Wait a minute. I seem to have found a loophole in your words. If they are the lackeys of the target monks, why should they stop us from our plan?

"That's right. If they were really the lackeys of that target monk. To oppose our plan in this way is tantamount to the opposite. I don't think there will be such stupid lackeys, since they are all lackeys, what they have to do is to protect the safety of the boss. But did they protect it? No. ”

"That's good. It seems that we should listen to his explanation. What do you think? If we don't listen, I think we're in danger. Because, we've just discussed something weird. Let's listen to it. Do you have any objections?"

"Nope. If it was not so long ago, I would never agree with it, but after you reminded me of this, I suddenly realized that it seems that it is completely impossible not to listen to it. Let's listen to it. Listen to it, at least we have one more choice. Maybe this extra choice is our life. ”

"Stinky boy. You're in luck. Now you can explain. There will be no more objections from any of us. Why did you oppose our plan just now. What is the reason. Please be clear and clear in any case. If you fool us, it won't end well. Let me remind you. ”

"Thank you all for your generosity. Then I'll just say it. Actually, what I was most worried about just now was what everyone was worried about. If we surrender, half of the men will surely get close to the target monks, right?

What if our target of surrender is not accepted by the monk? He just shot and killed half of us who surrendered. Do you think the remaining half will be able to win? That's what worries me the most, and that's why I'm always not in favor of using this plan.

Because, we haven't negotiated with the target monk. He certainly wouldn't really believe that we were going to surrender. He must have thought that there might be some conspiracy on this. So, since there is a conspiracy, it is better to simply kill it. So, do you think such a plan is still useful?

So in my opinion, this plan seems to be very powerful and reasonable, but in fact, it is full of loopholes and great dangers. If our expectations were correct, we would all die. Of course. Maybe many people will say, and there may be the possibility that the other side will accept our surrender.

I would say that if you think that this possibility really arises, we will be fine, that is still naïve. Or, rather, it's not that it's naïve, but that it's too simple to think of the target monk. He accepted the surrender of the half we sent, but what about the remaining half?

The remaining half of the people continued to shoot and resist at that time. In that case, in his opinion, the remaining half of the people are stubborn people, and he still has reason to accept the surrender of the remaining half? Surely not. He's going to kill the remaining half.

In this way, we will have to kill at least half of our people, whether our plans succeed or fail. Can you accept such a plan? Are you willing to accept it? I don't think anyone wants to be the sacrificial half, right? So, this plan can't be carried out under any circumstances. In order to implement the plan, we have to change the content of the plan.

Only in this way will we be able to safely get through this difficult time and safely fulfill the entrustment of the Lord. You see, it means that the Lord himself has not escaped from the battlefield, which means that he intends to share our hatred. If we surrender, how can we be worthy of him? Therefore, I think that our plan must take into account the representatives in order to be feasible. ”

"How is it possible to take the representative into account? The representative is still some distance away from us, and even if we want to discuss the plan with him, it will be impossible for us. What's more, when we are so far away, we have to discuss the plan with him, and only by shouting.

If you shout so loudly, the plan will be heard by the target monk. What's the point? Do you have a way to come up with a plan that can be successfully implemented even if it is heard? I don't believe there is such a plan. I don't think there will be such a plan either. If there is, all I can say is that it's amazing. ”

"It's amazing. If such a plan exists, it should not be possible for people like us to come up with it, right? In that case, why should we bother to think about it? Wouldn't it be better to think of a simpler and more effective plan? If it were simple, it wouldn't be too difficult for us to carry it out. If it's too complicated, I'm afraid we'll make a mistake when we run it. ”

"It's a real problem. The fact that the plan is prone to mistakes means that the probability of success is low. If it's low, why should we make such a plan? Wouldn't it be better to make a simpler plan? Although a simpler plan is easy to see, on the contrary, a simpler plan has a greater chance of success.

We can use speed to close the loopholes that are easy to see. As long as the plan is carried out before the monk sees through our plan, then there will be no problem? Don't you see it that way? I firmly believe that we can do it. As long as there is enough speed. ”

"You talk a lot. With enough speed, it can indeed close the loopholes in the plan that are easy to see. But it depends on who our opponents are. If the opponent is an ordinary person, then it is indeed possible to use speed. After all, the reaction time of ordinary people is very long, and some ordinary people are even very slow.

But we are now facing a monk, and the strength of this monk is quite strong, if it is not so strong, it is impossible for so long, and he has not been injured. The fact that he was able to dodge for so long without getting hurt is enough to show that he is far faster than we think.

And we want to use speed to compensate for the lack of planning. Is it really possible? Not at all. Because, to achieve such an effect, it means that the speed must be faster than that monk, but I would like to ask everyone here, who can be faster than that monk in terms of speed? I'm afraid there is no one.

If someone can really suppress the target monk in terms of speed, what other plan do we need? Wouldn't it be better to just let the faster member introduce the target monk into our fire center? Even if the opponent is not fooled, we can go around his back and hit him after the opponent dodges one attack, and when he is about to dodge the second attack but has no time to react.

With such dense firepower, as long as he dodges the slightest mishap, he will die. In that case, he would definitely be injured. If there is one, there must be two, and if he was wounded once, will there not be a second time? Moreover, the time for the second injury is certainly faster and shorter than the first.

Because, if he is injured, the speed of dodging must have an effect, and it can't be as perfect as before. Even if he can really grit his teeth and do it perfectly, it must be holding on. At this time, if we concoct the method just now, aren't we sure that we can get him injured a second time?

Therefore, it is certain that he will get hurt, and, more than ever, as time goes by. That way, we could have killed him without any brain cells. He must have been annoyed by the colleague who hit him and wanted to kill him. But because the firepower was too strong, there was no way.

In the end, he could only helplessly and powerlessly accept the reality of being killed. However, we don't have such a great colleague.

So, do you understand my painstaking efforts now? If I can, I don't really want to make things too complicated, but I really can't help it. We don't have any advantages on our side, so we have to make the plan complicated enough. Because, if the plan is complicated enough, we are not afraid that he will see through our plan. The plan is simple and you can see through it at a glance.

The plan is complicated, and if he sees through the plan, it must only be a partial plan. In other words, what he saw through and what he didn't see through actually had no effect on the outcome of the plan. It is this kind of complex planning that we need. ”

"But the plan was good. But if it's too complicated, so many of us may not think of it. Isn't it too hard for you to make us think about this kind of plan? I'm more worried that if we do what you say. That's bound to be a distraction.

And our target monk is quite powerful. If we get distracted, he won't miss the chance to sneak up. As long as he succeeds in a sneak attack, we only need to reduce our personnel again, and we will not be able to maintain a close battle situation like we are now. As long as it's not evenly matched, then we have to wait for death. ”

"That's right. Your idea is good. But if you can't implement it, it's still useless. It's a bit of a pity, but that's the reality. If the opponent we're up against isn't that tough, I don't mind stopping and thinking about what to do. ”

"I think so too. If there is time, and the current situation allows, your suggestion is quite good. But the problem is, we don't have that condition at all. Since there are no conditions, then forcibly implementing this plan will only kill us. Isn't it?"

"Don't get excited, everybody. Don't be in a hurry. I'm not done yet. My plan requires a lot of brainpower, and as long as someone uses their brains, they will definitely have to stop shooting. But we don't have to be that narrow. If you look at it openly, this problem can actually be completely resolved.

We need to stop, but is there a difference between stopping everyone and stopping one person? It's a big difference, isn't it? But if it's just one person who thinks about it, people will definitely say that such a difficult plan can't be thought of by one person alone. We have just verified this, and we need to make the plan come alive only with everyone's participation.

So, we can use this method to conceive a plan. First ask a person to stop, let him think for half a minute, and then, let him come up with a plan to tell the people around him, and then, the person who stopped will continue to shoot and keep shooting. And the person who was told the plan began to stop, and he began to think about the plan.

Because, with the outline of the previous person's plan, it will inevitably be much less difficult for him to think about the plan. So we repeated this many times, and when we had rounded everybody, wouldn't we be able to complete the plan? Do you see what I mean? This is my plan. It is also the only feasible way after I have thought it through. ”

"Oh my God. Stinky boy. You're not stupid. How is it that I didn't realize that you were so clever in the past, and that I was able to come up with such a clever solution today. I was convinced. Of course. It's also a blessing because your method is really good. If the way is not good. I will never praise you. I'm your boss, after all. ”

"That's right. I agree with him. It's a really good approach. I accept. ”