The doorman nodded, and said in his heart, "This problem is difficult to solve. Pen Fun Pavilion wWw. ｂiquge。 info, however, to fix anyway. After all, this is something he has to face, and it is something I have to face. If I can't solve this problem, then I can't get the truth next. If I don't get the truth, all my efforts will be in vain.

So, why do I have so much work? Do I have a lot of time? Am I safe? No. The reason why I want to find out the truth is to help me resolve the crisis now. Therefore, there is no escaping here. However, since there is no escape, there is the kind of person who can say one thing and do another.

And what should we do? There are too many such people in society. If not much, then it won't be difficult. That's where I'm going to defuse it. Of course. There is one more point that must be addressed. That is, if I really meet such people, how should I let these people resolve the conflict.

The best case scenario is for these people to wake up on their own. Because, if these people can be brought to their senses, they will not harm other people. And as long as there are more and more such people, then in the end, it is unlikely that too many people will be deceived. Otherwise, it's very dangerous.

It's just that if you want to solve such a contradiction, the most important thing is to find a leader. In other words, if you can make the person in charge understand this truth. That's great, of course. The leader has the greatest influence in this group. If it were someone else, it wouldn't have worked.

But there is one problem that is more difficult to solve, and that is how do I find this leader? Of course. I can't substitute myself, but I should substitute as a killer. After all, this happens in the Debate Contest. If I bring it in, I can't figure out the truth.

So how should we find the person who is the leader? A person with such a quality of duplicity will certainly not take the initiative to admit his character, and even if such a person has an organization, no one will know who is the leader. It can even be said that even if there is a person who can influence all the people of the same kind, then this most influential person is definitely not an ordinary person.

In other words, there must be a way to do this. That's right. I seem to have forgotten a very important thing. That is, it is impossible for such a person to be selected through public means. In other words, there is only one possibility to become such a person. That's the default.

When your influence reaches a certain level, then such a person will naturally be recognized by everyone. That's right. That's how it should be. In other words, who is the most influential person at this time? Isn't it the number one killer? The number one killer in the future.

And if you want to move the time point forward a little further, it must be the next person who takes the initiative to stand up and wants to become the number one killer. Because, those who stood up in front of them have been denied. And those who have been denied are certainly not just a few.

What is really denied is the kind of people who represent. That is to say, when someone stands up again, this new person who stands up will definitely not be the character of the front, nor the style of the front. So how do you make a difference? I know. This is the debate assembly. So, the best way to do this is through the lines.

Moreover, there is another benefit to lines. If the lines are not good, of course, it is useless, but on the contrary, once a person's line skills are very high, it is completely different. A person with high line skills can control all situations, including everyone in the arena of the press conference.

It's just that such requirements are very high. Did the person who took the initiative really have such skills? After all, he was surrounded by high-level killers at that time. And not a very weak bottom killer. It is very, very difficult to convince a high-level killer. But it's not entirely impossible.

It's just that it's very, very small. However, it doesn't matter if it's small or not, the most important thing is that it must integrate a very complete set of lines. In this way, if you can't convince everyone, you can at least convince the majority of people, and if you can convince the majority of people, it is possible to convince everyone.

Because, when the time comes, if there are those stubborn ones, they can take advantage of the fact that the few must obey the majority to force those people to submit. Of course. This approach is a bit too overbearing. It's also a little too much. After all, this seems to be the most democratic option, but the truth is quite the opposite. If different opinions cannot be tolerated, is it still called democracy?

Another thing that must be clarified is that even if this method is excessive, overbearing, and not democratic enough, it will definitely happen. After all, it was a debate. When everyone feels hopeless, the killer with such thoughts will definitely not be able to hold back himself.

After all, the throne of the number one killer is the dream of everyone here. Even the female spokesperson selected by Lord Shi Hai must be very interested in the throne of the number one killer. The reason why that woman didn't sit in that position in the end, but gave up the position to Lord Shi Hai, all because she loved Lord Shi Hai.

However, this is a later story and will not be considered for the time being. After all, that woman needs to be the last to appear convincing. The earlier you appear, the less convincing it is. Although she had already stood up and spoken once, she had spoken mainly against women, and when she was confronted by men, no woman had ever stood up.

It's easy to understand. Although these female killers are all powerful and have a first-class strength, they are far from being comparable to men in terms of eloquence, vision, and mind. Therefore, even if you stand up shamelessly, you will definitely lose. So why stand up and sacrifice ugliness?

That's why women are choosing to be silent now. They have given up. No one thought they would have a chance to beat a man. This is not some superstitious and feudal thought, but a very scientific thought. Because, after so many years down. They have long understood a truth.

When a woman argues with a man, it's normal and perfectly acceptable for a woman to argue with a man over a man. Otherwise, there would be no such thing as a division of labor between men and women in this world. It's also important to understand that the present is not the same as it was in the past. In the past, women argued that men were still angry, which was a reflection of childishness. A woman can only accept reality.

However, not everyone can accept it all. If a man treats a woman politely, it doesn't matter. The biggest problem is that sometimes some men treat women really badly. In other words, such a person is really not something that ordinary people can do.

Even now, these women get angry when they meet men who are excessive. It's just that the biggest difference between the present and the past is that if the women of the past were angry, they would definitely stand up against it at all costs. This is not the case now. Today's women are angry, at most, they are angry. It's okay to get angry.

As for opposing men, they won't do it. Because, after doing it, it will only make others see the joke in the future. So what should the man who came forward say? It's still line skills. I kind of get it. He will first exaggerate his claims tenfold or even a hundredfold. Even, maybe this proposition is completely opposite to my own sincerity.

Because, only in this way, can he be called the most outstanding of duplicitous people. I see, that's the key. All right. That's what he probably said. I know you're wondering what kind of killer we should be the best person by now. It's just been so many rounds of scrambling.

You must have the answer in your mind, right? I know that the person in everyone's mind must be themselves. Because, the previous lesson can be said to be experience. That's enough to make us better. It's just that if you let everyone stand up and choose once, it won't work.

Also, I know that everyone wants to be the number one killer. It's just that being the number one killer also requires a lot of restrictions. So, in any case, instead of satisfying everyone's desire to be the number one killer, it is better to let a few people be satisfied.

Do you know what that means? It seems that you don't quite understand it yet. It's okay, I don't understand I can explain it. The answer is that we can fulfill our heart's desires by nominating someone. Any idea why this is?

Because, as long as everyone puts the thoughts in their hearts on one person, then as long as that person is consistent with everyone's thoughts, isn't it? In this way, the words of this chosen person can be representative of most of us. In this way, although we were not able to be the number one killer, there is actually no difference between that person being the number one killer and us being the number one killer ourselves.

Everybody's right, right? Look, no one is against it. This means that everyone has acquiesced. However, speaking of which, I'm sure there must be someone who thinks so in their hearts. Since you have to choose one person to represent ten people or hundreds of people. So, who should be chosen.

Can that person be himself. If it's not yourself, why can't you do it yourself. Is there anything that can be done to remedy this? All in all, the position of the number one killer is still up to you. Because, no one can avoid the fact that this person who became the number one killer will regret it when the time comes.

After all, something like this has already happened. Moreover, it is not the first time that such a thing has happened. There have been many, many times. In order to be able to avoid the same tragedy again. I wouldn't allow that to happen. I'm not going to let you suffer that kind of setback again.

Therefore, I would like you to nominate me. Of course. It's not without merit that I let everyone nominate me. It is true that I will work for the benefit of everyone, and there is another point, as long as the people who are willing to nominate me now. Once I'm really elected number one killer, I can give a big promise.

For example, I'll readjust the ranking methodology. In other words, I will make a special exception to improve the ranking of a few key people who support me. I don't think I need to explain how much of a benefit such conditions are for everyone, right? What's wrong? There are still people with bewildered expressions on their faces.

What does this mean? Does it mean that you have been doing high-level killer league rankings for so long and don't even know the role of rankings? Do you really think that ranking is just the level of strength? Isn't that good? There is a deeper meaning.

In other words. If you rank high, you can have many unimaginable benefits. Since there are still people among you who don't understand it too well, then I should be more thorough. Anyway, everyone is their own person. Listen up. The way I asked everyone to do this is because when you increase your ranking, your value will also increase.

Now you understand, right? If I don't understand at this time, and I still show that expression, I'm going to be angry. You're deliberately making fun of me. Actually, it's very simple. I tell you these things in the hope that this method will tempt you to elect me.

The biggest difference between me and the guy just now is that I don't ask everyone to vote for me. I just think that if anyone thinks I have a good character, then they can vote for me. I also hope that more people will nominate me. This gives me a good chance of being the number one killer.

And as long as I sit on the number one killer, the few people who recommended me at the beginning will be beneficial, and I will be the first to recommend me. However, I'm not a tyrannical. In the same way, you are welcome to nominate others. In this way, everyone's choice is real.

In other words, if everyone chooses to nominate me for my benefit, I will not be happy, or even grateful. Because, it only makes me think that everyone has ulterior motives and everyone is greedy. Instead, I will repay those who didn't put me up for when I was elected number one killer.

Because they didn't nominate me, it means that these people are sincere. They are also not greedy. After all, not everyone has the mind and ability to do this or that. Nor is it anything that can easily hide one's greed.

It's just that if all of you vote for someone else, that's not good. Because, in that case, no one will elect me. So, how am I going to be the number one killer? Then the other guy is elected. However, if someone else is elected, will he still benefit everyone as much as I do?

Then I don't know. Maybe he'll give more. But maybe he'll give less. However, in either case, at least one thing is certain, and that is that the benefits he gave were definitely not as good as those I gave. ”