The doorman exclaimed, "With this logic, the rest of the matter will be very interesting." *With* Dream *Small* Say .lā Because, if that's the case, it means that these smart people will continue to let this stupid person try it. After all, there's a lot more to eat. As long as you let this person try it, you can continue to observe.

If this is the luck of the whole thing, it will get better and better all of a sudden. Of course, you can stop him from eating it halfway. Then, I simply ate the rest. In this case, your luck will be exploded. But is it really going to go that way? I'm afraid not.

Because, the mistakes made in the past will still continue to be made. In fact, this is also very understandable, the smarter people must be to do things, the more cautious they are, and the more cautious they are, the more timid they are. And the more timid you are, the more you dare not take risks.

In that case, what mood would you be in to try it yourself? Surely not. They must think so. That's right. These foods can indeed increase my luck, but if the luck of these foods is also related to the person who eats them, isn't it a loss?

For example, my luck was eighty, and that person's luck was only twenty. So, for the same piece of food, he can increase by ten points, while I can only increase by one point. In that case, I will not be able to increase much if I eat all the rest of the food.

This is a conservative estimate. If this is not the case, but a worse stage, it will be more troublesome. For example, if the increase in this food can be increased by one point by one bite, but I can only increase by 0.01 percent by taking one bite, then there is a hundredfold difference, which means that I have to eat 100 bites to get the same increase as him.

However, my score was already very high, and if I had eaten a hundred bites, I would have to eat all of it. Does it really make sense that my luck has increased so little bit? In my opinion, it doesn't mean anything at all.

Of course, that's not the worst-case scenario. At worst, I don't even know if this stuff has side effects. In other words, if you eat it all, you can really increase your luck. But what if this food is the kind of food that the more you eat, the more obvious the side effects are?

If I eat all the rest at once, does it mean that the side effects I suffer will be quite terrifying? If these side effects can be known in advance, I may have a way to prevent them, but the problem is that it is impossible to know in advance.

I'm not a prophet who knows what's to come. So, it's an unavoidable danger. There is obviously a trap ahead, but I don't choose to avoid it now, but I want to take the initiative to jump into it, and use this method to show my bravery? It's not bravery, it's stupidity.

That's right. Only stupid people with extremely stupid brains would have such a reaction. I'm a smart person. How could I make such a mistake? Not in any case. In that case, I might as well continue with my experiment. Right. Just let the person keep eating. In this way, as long as he eats enough, then what the side effects will be obvious.

As long as I see the side effects from him, then I can know if I should eat these foods. But. Actually, it's not very safe. Because, since the side effects are mentioned, it means that the side effects of these things may not take effect immediately.

Some adjuvants have a very short period of effect, and it can even be said that, in general, no one will have side effects. The people who really have side effects are the average person. Wouldn't that be terrible if this guy had a different physique than I did? Because that's perfectly understandable.

Some people are born with a body that can resist these side effects. But the problem is actually obvious, some people are in good physical condition, and the side effects will not take effect, it does not mean that I am the kind of person who is in good physical condition! Even if I am that kind of person, however, there will be exceptions to everything.

In other words, maybe I am in good health and can resist many side effects, but there is one side effect that I can't resist anyway. And this time on the food, the side effects are exactly the kind that I can't resist the most. However, such a side effect, the guy who tried it can perfectly resist it.

In this case, if I really drove him away, and then ate all the rest of the food myself, what would that amount to asking for my own misery, asking for my own sin. Of course, this is still a relatively mild side effect. If the side effects are so strong that I can't bear them at all, it will definitely make me want to kill myself.

I'm alive and well, and I'm naturally lucky, but it's not the best, so why should I take such a reckless risk? Of course, as the old saying goes, wealth is in danger. As long as I take the risk, then with a little luck, I may really be able to surpass myself and become the one with the luckiest person.

However, this is only a possibility. What if it was the other way around? I failed? What does that mean? It means I'm a fool. What will those fools who I despise and trample on think of me? Will they still admire me as much as they do now?

No. They're just laughing at me like they've been bugging bugs. I don't want that. All right. Since this is a dangerous behavior, at most I don't want this food, so let this person eat it all. In this case, the person's luck may rise to the highest point.

But what's the use of his luck? I've got him under control now. As long as I use all my financial resources and force to imprison him, no amount of luck he has. That's the safest thing for me. Otherwise, if he is allowed to go out easily, it will definitely turn the outside upside down.

After all, if he really succeeded. Luck was a blast. Who else could have killed him? Captivity is difficult. The reason why I can imprison him now is because of the relationship that occupies the heavens. Trapped him here before he became the luckiest man.

In this case, even if he is lucky, it will be useless. But is that really the case? I'm afraid not. If someone does eat that food, they won't be able to get out. If you really can't get out, it only proves that the fact that the food can increase luck is in itself a fake.

That is, the experiment was answered in the best way, and everything that precedes is false. However, there are some things that cannot be decided that way. In other words, if the thing is the other way around, it's dangerous. The clever man had taken the fool up and imprisoned him, thinking that it was impossible to trap him.

If the food is real, and the amount of luck increased is very, very much, when this fool really becomes a person of bad luck, then he will definitely not be imprisoned. If the place where he was imprisoned was guarded, then he only had to pretend that he needed water, or that he was sick, and then he could get out.

Because, he's lucky. Therefore, there will definitely be people who believe that even if they are repeatedly told by that smart person at the beginning, it is useless. After all, the object they are guarding is already a lucky existence, then, there will definitely be such a lucky situation, and this guy's illness is believed by others.

Then, those who believe in him will do things that are incomprehensible at flying speed. For example, the slightest is to open the cell to see what the stupid guy is doing, and if it is more serious, he will even take the initiative to kill his co-worker. As for the reason, it must be bizarre. Any reason is fine.

For example, suddenly seeing a colleague who is not pleasing to the eye, suddenly becoming benevolent, and suddenly wanting to save that stupid person out. Or, suddenly, I found that the stupid person looked very similar to my child who had passed away for many years, and developed a strong father's or mother's love. All in all, you can do it for any reason.

Did anyone let that idiot's luck blow up? If it does, anything can happen. Of course, that guy wouldn't be happy if that happened. That wise man will definitely stand guard at the door, saying, as long as I guard here, you will not be able to get out even if you are lucky.

But is that really the case? No, it won't. People have three urgencies. If he could keep guarding the door at this time, of course he could stop the stupid guy, but once he suddenly had a stomachache, wouldn't he find a convenient place to go?

Even if he wanted to, he couldn't. Because, it's so shameful. Of course. If he wasn't a shameful person in the first place, he was just very smart. Then, he will indeed solve it on the spot. It's just that what can be solved on the spot is the problem of urinating and defecating.

How can we solve other problems? Especially the issue of eating. When he's hungry, where is he going to eat? Is it where he is? What can there be in the same place? There will be nothing. There will only be dirt. Is he eating dirt in order to keep this fool from escaping?

This is absolutely impossible. Unless he's crazy. Of course. There are also such cases, and since I want to infer them, I must take them all into account, although this possibility is very rare, but it is also very important. After all, if the exception is not taken into account, all the inferences will appear incomplete. And as long as you infer that you are incomplete, you may be biased.

What if the deviation does happen, and it does? In this case, the exception is not taken into account, which is the biggest fatal injury. When the time comes, all my assumptions may be overturned by just an accident. And as long as it is overturned, it will be very difficult for me to re-infer it.

It's completely conceivable. If you think of my inference as a building block game, then everything is like a building block. If you want to become stronger, you must accumulate the blocks very high. However, this is also a very dangerous thing.

Because, the more time to infer and the more things to be inferred, the higher the height of the accumulation of building blocks, the higher the building blocks, the more unstable the upper layer will be, and the more unstable the upper layer will be to collapse, the possibility of collapse will be greatly improved. And if it collapses, all my assumptions will be disrupted.

So, while I still have the ability to re-infer, how much time will it take? I don't have to waste all this time? This is not the most terrible situation. The scariest thing is, when all my bricks fall, what if one of them is lost?

For example, I don't know where I flew. I can't find it for the time being. Because, my inference can be established, that the building blocks can be stacked so high, and each building block has this inextricable relationship, as long as one of them is missing, then many building blocks will not be able to connect.

And as long as many bricks can't be connected, more bricks mean that they can't be connected either. In this way, all inferences will be like tying a dead knot, stuck in a dead loop, and will never come out again. Is this what I want to see? Surely not. Therefore, I have to take into account exceptions.

The exception just now is that this person may brazenly accept it, just to keep this lucky fool from leaving here, and stay here to eat dirt. Even, he may have brought too much food in the beginning just to be on the safe side. Prepared and unprepared are two different concepts entirely.

For example, if he is not prepared, he can only last three days at most with his endurance, but with food everything is different, he can last three more days. Wouldn't he be able to guarantee that the fool wouldn't leave? Because, although this can last twice as long, in fact, the significance is not very great.

Because, since that fool is already the luckiest man, he can surely escape from the blockade of the smart man, so how should he escape? Definitely not. He will definitely choose to rest, that is, simply snort and sleep, sleeping to minimize the consumption of food.

When he wakes up, then, as long as he holds on until the clever man can't take it anymore, won't he be able to escape? Don't even do anything, just walk by him easily, of course. If this stupid person is the kind of cruel person, it is not impossible to kill the smart person. ”