"Just now I talked about Mr. Cheng Li's four standards, why do I question the four standards? In addition to the evidence I found just now, there is actually another reason, that is, this standard is too broad and too broad, almost equivalent to no standard.www.biquge.info ”

Before this lecture, Huang Yifan had a careful preparation for Chu Ci, although Cheng Li's "four standards" made Huang Yifan a little surprised, but with his understanding of Chu Ci, he still found a reason to respond: "I know that several professors may disagree with my point of view again, it doesn't matter if I don't agree, I will finish speaking." ”

Seeing that Cheng Li seemed to be ready to refute what he said, Huang Yifan said: "Why do you say that the four standards are equal to no standards, in fact, if we explain it in another word, for example, what is Tang poetry, then, can we interpret it as a book Tang language, a Tang Sheng, a Ji Tang country, and a name Tang Wu?"

Yes, if such a standard is really followed, the four major standards about Chu Ci can also be applied to Tang and Song poems. However, now that we think about it, is Tang poetry such a characteristic?

No, no, Tang and Song poems not only have these characteristics, but also have their more important characteristics - rhythm.

Whether it is five words or seven words, whether it is flat or thousand, if we don't talk about the rhythm of Tang poetry and Song poetry, then we can't really understand what Tang poetry and Song poetry are. Shu Chu language, as Chu Sheng, Ji Chu Di, and Ming Chu Wu seem to be the criteria for evaluating Chu Ci, but this standard only emphasizes the background of Chu Ci, and does not emphasize Chu Ci itself, and I think that these four standards are not standards at all. ”

However, for Huang Yifan's questioning, Yan University professor Cheng Li is not an idle person, after Huang Yifan's strong defense, Cheng Li said: "Teacher Huang Yifan, in fact, before I came to your lecture, I knew that you would use the "rhythm" to counter the four major standards of Chu Ci that I put forward before. However, for thousands of years, Chu Ci has long been lost, and there is no way to study the specific rules of Chu Ci. Taishi Jun said that Chu Ci has four words and five words, six words and seven words, and even eight words, nine words and ten words...... The sentence structure is flexible and changeable, and the form of expression is like the water of a river, without traces.

The famous historian of the Han Dynasty "Ban Xun" also believes that Chu Ci is different from all kinds of poetry in China, but more lively and gorgeous, and the length is longer, and believes that Chu Ci is "reciting Fu without singing", some like Han Fu, but not Han Fu, similar to classical prose, but more meaningful than classical prose. Therefore, on the whole, Chu Ci does not have an absolute discipline. It is basically impossible to define what is Chu Ci purely from the grid law. ”

"I don't think that Chu Ci has no rhythm, everything follows a certain law, and the same is true for writing poems and lyrics, there is no poetry without rhythm, why modern poetry develops so slowly, in fact, it has a lot to do with the lack of rhythm. Of course, we are not talking about modern poetry now, we are talking about Chu Ci. We know that the background of Chu Ci was in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, and above Chu Ci were hymns, and above the hymns were primitive poetry collections. In fact, whether it is a hymn or a primitive collection of poems, they already have a specific metric. Like hymns, four words are generally used, and the rhyming battle is progressed layer by layer to increase the sense of language. The origin of Chu Ci is after the hymn, why does the hymn have a rhythm, but Chu Ci does not have a rhythm? Not only that, in addition to hymns, almost all ancient poems in China have rhythms, is Chu Ci an exception? ”

Huang Yifan and Cheng Li competed against each other.

One word from you, one word from me.

One is a master of Chu Cixue, and the other is a rising poetry rookie.

One is a professor at Yan University, and the other is a lecturer at Mizuki.

Although the identities of the two are very different, they show a sense of parity at this time.

"Wonderful."

I don't know who shouted, and the audience instantly burst into applause.

Although Chu Ci's debate was not over, the debate between the two made the audience very enjoyable.

I didn't expect the academic debate to be so exciting.

In particular, some of the students were a little stunned by the attacks of the two sides quoting scriptures.

In my heart, I secretly said that the academic skills of the two parties were so strong. Even if some of them don't understand Chu Ci, but under the uninterrupted debate between the two, they have gradually understood the concept of Chu Ci.

At the same time, in the eyes of the school leaders on Mizuki's side, they are also relieved. Although the two sides have not decided on a winner or loser for the time being, seeing that Huang Yifan can not only respond calmly, but also be able to attack in the "Cheng Li" controversy with such a strong academic, he is no longer so worried in his heart.

No matter what the final result of this lecture is, even if Huang Yifan loses, it is expected that it will not have any impact on Huang Yifan. It is even possible to further enhance Huang Yifan's fame. After all, no matter what, Huang Yifan is only in his 20s but can talk eloquently with the professor of Yan Dachu's resignation, this courage and academic skills are really extraordinary.

In the eyes of those media reporters, this is also a retraction of the previous view of Huang Yifan.

I used to want to come to the play, but now it seems that there is no hope.

Huang Yifan was even stronger than they expected. No, it's just so powerful I don't know how many times.

Isn't that even more exciting, though?

Although there is no big drama that cannot be ended on either side, such a wonderful academic debate between the two sides has also feasted the eyes of a group of media reporters.

"I think Mr. Huang Yifan, your point of view is also reasonable, and Chu Ci may also have a rhythm, but because it was lost, we didn't grasp it. However, it is precisely because Chu Ci has been lost, simply studying the rhythm of Chu Ci sentence form, I think this is a waste of the basics, and it will not work at all. If Mr. Huang Yifan is so convinced that Chu Ci has a rhythm, then, I would like to ask, what is the rhythm of Chu Ci? Five or six or six words, rhyme or not, does it have anything to do with Pingxuan...... You won't say that the rhythm of Chu Ci is the Xiti poem you invented before. ”

Justifying this, Cheng Li also withdrew his contemptuous gaze at Huang Yifan, but said secretly in his heart: "This little guy is also powerful, and his research on Chu Ci may not be under him, but in the end, he is still a little arrogant, and he doesn't take these authorities in his eyes too much." Do you think that some of our experts in Chu Ci are those "bricks" who are rumored on the Internet? ”

"Hey, Professor Cheng Li, how do you know that the rhythm I am talking about is related to the "Xi" style. ”

Huang Yifan replied with a little surprise.

This made Cheng Li cry and laugh a little: "Xiti poetry is the rhythm of Chu Ci, are you sure?" ”

If the body is the most important rule of Chu Ci, then doesn't it mean that the Chu Ci he wrote before is really a genuine Chu Ci.

In this way, even if we know that the three poems written by Huang Yifan before were written by modern people, they can no longer be regarded as Chu Ci, but because of his important discovery, because Huang Yifan has studied the core "rhythm" problem of Chu Ci and thoroughly further the study of Chu Ci, then, at that time, even if you don't want to admit it, you have to admit it.

Because at that time, it was no longer a question of whether to admit it or not.

Whether you admit it or not, as long as Huang Yifan confirms that Xiti poetry is the rhythm of Chu Ci, he is the highest authority on Chu Ci.

Just like they can move out of the four standards, even if you want to deny it, you don't necessarily have the qualifications.

"Sure."

Huang Yifan said with great certainty.

It can be said that the most significant feature of Chu Ci is the addition of the word "Xi".

Without the words, he is incomplete.

There is no word, and in people's images, he is not even Chu Ci.

It's just that although Huang Yifan is sure, there is still one of the most important questions: "The Chu Ci of this world has been lost, how can he prove to everyone that the quotation of the word "Xi" in Chu Ci is the most important rule of Chu Ci?" ”

At the same time, Cheng Li also asked Huang Yifan questions.

===

ps: Brothers, about the controversy over Chu Ci, Xiaobai has checked countless information. The climax is coming, and the future will be even more exciting. Ask for a commuter pass. (To be continued.) )