Although the incident of "The Great Aerial Heist" is just an isolated case, the impact it has brought is unprecedented.

Because of the boycott of "The Great Robbery in the Air" and the model of countering Hollywood movie giants, it suddenly made some netizens' eyes shine.

Now it's just a "Big Plane Heist", so can you use the same way to fight Hollywood blockbusters in the future?

Don't say it, it's really not impossible, the key point lies in the attitude of the video legalization alliance.

In fact, Chinese people don't buy genuine versions, it's not that there is no cohesion, what stand-alone games have been produced in China in the past, and there will be cracked versions soon.

But now, since the decline of stand-alone games in China, some netizens have begun to launch activities on the Internet to support domestic stand-alone games.

Asked netizens not to upload a cracked version of the stand-alone game, as a result, it was really successful, although this time could not last long, but it was enough.

And the movie itself pays more attention to timeliness, like this time "The Great Robbery in the Air" pirated high-definition video incident, the most critical thing in "The Great Robbery in the Air" is the time when it was released, but what is the result? The next day, the high-definition version of the video source appeared, and the box office of "The Great Robbery in the Air" can be imagined.

Then the Video Licensing Alliance belatedly blocked the pirated video sources of those pirated websites.

But at this time, "The Great Air Robbery" has long passed the release time, and it is about to be released.

So this incident not only made Chinese netizens raise their eyebrows, but also made those Hollywood film and television companies see the power of the video legalization alliance for the first time.

I saw the vast magic power of Chinese netizens.

They couldn't help but start to get nervous, because Huaguo is already the second largest movie box office after North America, and it involves a huge market.

Once the Huaguo Video Licensing Alliance takes similar measures against all North American blockbusters, it will definitely be fatal for them.

And the key is this kind of thing, at most, you can only protest, but people don't do it, the ban is blocked, but the time is up to them.

As for the official side, don't talk nonsense, they won't care so much.

It is not a resource provided by the video alliance, and the video licensing alliance itself is an alliance formed by enterprises spontaneously.

As a result, another blockbuster film of the second North American film and television giant, followed by "The Great Air Robbery", once again staged a boycott with Chinese characteristics.

Don't count on the box office or anything, and even the network copyright can't be sold.

On the other hand, as soon as piracy appeared in Chinese films, the Video Alliance took measures as soon as possible, although it could not completely eliminate it, but it greatly reduced the impact of piracy.

As for why Hollywood blockbusters are leaked so quickly, everyone knows about this, but they can't do anything about it.

And this is the first time that a pirate has been praised.

The film and television giants of the United States are not fools, and they naturally know that there must be a shadow of golden film and television behind this, or the shadow of Ye Qiu.

And this also allowed them to really see Ye Qiu's influence in Huaguo.

Who initiated the video alliance? Huaguo's No. 1 video website, Yisou Video Network, and although Yisou Video Network and Dianjin Film and Television are not the same company, they are the same boss.

There is also a search engine that searches for the largest share in China, which is also Ye Qiu's.

Although it seems that Ye Qiu has not done anything, the worst thing is that he has not done anything.

If even Huaguo's movies have suffered the same thing, it can be said to be accidental, but only Hollywood movies have encountered this situation, and fools also know that this is particularly artificial.

Of course, Ye Qiu couldn't cover the sky single-handedly in the video legalization alliance, but this time the other members were surprisingly silent.

What does this mean? It means that this time the Chinese film threat theory they advocated not only stimulated Ye Qiu, but also those film and television giants in Huaguo.

In fact, if the Hollywood film and television giants want to make some trouble for Ye Qiu in North America, it really shouldn't be too simple.

It's just that Hollywood's film and television giants are not monolithic, and once some bottom lines are broken, it will certainly make the films of Dianjin Film and Television very troublesome, but it is also equivalent to tearing the skin.

Or that it is a bit detrimental to others and not to oneself.

Naturally, the profit-oriented Hollywood giants would not do this.

There is a big difference between North American and Chinese enterprises that North America generally adopts the professional manager responsibility system, but Huaguo is often the big boss who has the final say.

For example, although the companies under Ye Qiu's name have hired professional managers, as long as Ye Qiu's decision is made, whether the manager agrees or not, he must do what he wants.

However, foreign companies are different, many of them have scattered shareholdings, and they have a professional manager system, and professional managers are accountable to the board of directors.

But most of the time, professional managers have a lot of authority, and professional managers need business data to sit in a position.

In other words, Ye Qiu can do this in a word, even if he loses, it will be fine, because he is a big boss, but Hollywood film and television giants are different.

If you lose, it means that the manager's ability is insufficient, and the shareholders will not care what you do, what they want is profit.

So very quickly someone couldn't sit still.

On this day, Ye Qiu received an invitation, an invitation to a charity dinner.

When it comes to charity, many Chinese people have a very intuitive impression that foreigners like to do charity very much.

In China, there have been many charity scandals before, and often some people who eat melons will list how their foreign charity funds are.

But in reality?

It is true that foreigners like to do charity very much, especially the richer they are, the more they like to do charity.

Some people even donate all their assets to charitable foundations, which looks very generous, selfless, and loving.

But in reality, no one's money is blown by the wind, and the same is true for foreigners, don't they love money? The answer is no.

So why do they like to do charity so much?

This is the difference in national conditions, because doing charity abroad can avoid taxes.

There are so many foreign charity funds, and the scale is hundreds of millions or even tens of billions of dollars at every turn, and it feels very awesome to look at the numbers, and I feel that people do charity, and our people do charity, why is there such a big gap?

But in fact, how many foreign charitable funds are actually used for charity?

Most of the funds are set up solely to avoid taxes, but in reality, how charitable funds operate is not up to them?

Therefore, for those abroad who put all their belongings in the charity fund, Ye Qiu can only be hehe.

It's just a bunch of guys selling dog meat on sheep's heads, and they are just evading taxes reasonably in the name of charity.