The doorman said to himself, "Yes. That's fine. As long as he says such a thing, the interviewer will definitely not be able to stand it in the end, no matter how good he is. It's a decision that doesn't require anything to make. It's something that should be taken into account no matter what.

If it were someone else, there might be hesitation of one kind and another. However, that young interviewer certainly wouldn't be like that. In this way, the next problem will be very troublesome. The young interviewer must be anxious, and if he is anxious, what can he do?

In that case, there seems to be only one way to defeat the others. That is to let others understand that in fact, this kind of thing is not irreversible, but you can't think of a way to reverse it. That's right. If you follow this line of thinking, it will not be difficult to succeed.

It's just that this kind of thing can also be problematic depending on the strength of the object. If the object is strong, then the difficulty will obviously increase a lot, but no matter how difficult things are, they can actually be passed. It's like a game that is very popular in the Federation right now, and if you can clear it without any damage, it will be a great thing.

And the opposite. If you can't clear the level without injury, it is a reflection of your strength. Because, most people need to be injured. And as long as you can get hurt, there will be situations like this. But it doesn't have to be such a moment, generally speaking, there is no such moment, there must be some conflict with others.

This time, though, the young interviewer definitely avoided this kind of question. Otherwise, he would not have become an interviewer or would have become an interviewer now, but would have become the corpse of the old interviewer in front of him early. So that means he's found a way, it's just that what exactly this method is, I need to figure it out.

If I wasn't trying to deduce the truth, I could have taken a perfunctory approach here. Because, only perfunctory is the best attitude, after all, perfunctory is easy. Is there anything easier in this world than perfunctory? No.

There must be some people who are not convinced, saying, "If I don't do anything, it will be easier than perfunctory." But this is clearly a dream. In other words, the person who has this kind of thinking must still be a student, or a child living in a wealthy family, that is, this kind of person must be a person who has not experienced hardship.

Only those who have experienced hardship will understand that most people living in this world cannot do this, except for a few people who can ignore other things, even if they do nothing for a day. In particular, people living at the bottom need to run for a living.

I don't need to run around, I'm just a janitor, but I paid a lot of money before I became a janitor. Isn't that the best proof of this? Absolutely. There must be people who can say that you are already a doorman, doesn't it prove that you don't need to run around.

However, I would like to say that as a janitor, you also need to work, and work is something that you have to do every day, and if you don't do it, you will have no food to eat, and if you don't have food, you will die. But those young masters won't. The reason is very simple, I don't need to explain anything.

Their lives are too rich. And it's because their lives are too rich. Therefore, there will be a completely different life from ordinary people. If you have the same life, it's not normal. However, these are not the things we need to discuss at the moment, and the most important thing to understand now is how the young interviewer beat the old interviewer.

If you don't understand this, it will be difficult to answer the next series of questions. But before that, there is one more thing to figure out, whether the young interviewer fought the old interviewer at that time, or whether he used his mind to win. There is also a difference between the two methods.

If it's the brain, then I need to figure out what kind of strategy he used, and if it's the former, then I should figure out what kind of magic power he has to defeat the other party. It stands to reason that it is impossible for a weak person to win against a strong one. If you win, it's not normal.

However, he just won. I understand something. If nothing else, it is the latter that he should have used, which is the mind. It's like using eloquence to defeat that person. Yes. I finally got some idea. Isn't the best way for him to use his eloquence is to attack the spirit of the old interviewer.

Although in terms of experience, older interviewers are definitely much higher than younger interviewers, but in some aspects, older interviewers are far inferior to young interviewers, and that is the ability to withstand blows. It's not that the old interviewer is old and useless, but that he is old and can bear it mentally, but not necessarily physically.

Of course. There is also a special place at this time. It's not that if I can't do it, I can't do it, there are some feasible places, for example, I can defeat that person, but I didn't defeat it before, not because my strength is not good, but on the contrary, I just don't want to participate in this matter.

I was even more reluctant to beat that person. Therefore, in this case, if you can easily defeat a person, there is no problem. As long as you change your concept, such as when you are facing a life-and-death crisis, you can do it. There are also some special cases.

If I am not the opponent of the other party, it is not because of my strength, but because the other party has something to do with me, so I have to remember the friendship of the other party, so I will be merciful, which is also understandable. In this case, you only need to change your mindset to kill the opponent.

The same is true of another case. It's not the opponent's opponent in front of you, it's just because you need to cultivate, or because of some special reason, it's inconvenient to expose your true strength. Let's say you're a fugitive. Then, in this case, if you easily expose your strength, it will be very dangerous.

The more critical point is that once the problem is exposed, there will be such and such a difference, and it is better not to be exposed, and once it is exposed, then I may have to flee again. However, there are times when you don't want to be exposed, and some people will force you to be exposed.

In this case, it is natural that you can only play your strength to defeat the other party. However, there is also a more common situation, that is, the strength is not the opponent of the opponent at all, and in this case, it is too difficult to reverse. It's not that the weak can't beat the strong.

The weak can also overcome the strong. However, it takes time to defeat the strong. If you give him a year or two to cultivate, or even ten years. He will definitely be able to make up for the gap in strength. And as long as it is made up, then it will not be a battle between the strong and the weak to fight against the strong.

It's a battle between two strong men. It is precisely because of the battle between these two strong men that the final victory and defeat will become different. But is this realistic? Actually, it's not realistic. The old interviewer has all the rhetoric of killing the new interviewer. If this is the case, he still has to give that guy time to cultivate.

Is that there is a problem with the brain? It's not just that there is a problem with the brain, but if he really does this, people will laugh at him, and even look down on him, after all, what he did was too weird. And it's not just weird, it's even more disgusting. The biggest difference between the present and the people of the past is that the people of the past were not stupid.

We now know just a little more than we did in the past. If you say that the other person is stupid just because you don't know as much as we do, and you don't have as good as us, that kind of thinking is really too superficial. This kind of thinking is absolutely undesirable, and this kind of thinking is absolutely incorrect.

If you want to make your thinking less difficult, there is only one way, and that is to adjust. That is, what we traditionally call empathy. Only after transposition can you understand the thoughts of the ancients, and it is precisely because of empathy that we can understand and gain stronger strength.

Otherwise, we live like fools every day, and nothing good will come of it. In order not to be stupid, we will definitely not do the same thing as fools. And this time, isn't it just time for young interviewers to practice?

Therefore, this approach will definitely not work. So, there's only one way left to beat the old interviewer. That is to let the old interviewer understand that his strength is not actually below the other party, and this is the only way to do it, which is of course a scam, but the point is, as long as you can make the old interviewer believe that it is not okay?

I see. That's a good idea. It's very difficult to convince others. Because, I don't believe it in the first place. After all, in that case, there is no security guarantee, and if there is, there may be some good points, but this is obviously not.

In that case, what should we do? First of all, you have to tell yourself repeatedly in your heart that this is actually true, right. Only in this way can you make yourself believe in repeated hypnosis. And as long as you believe it, then the next step is easy, just laugh out loud.

As for the lines, it's okay to be casual. If it's not casual, it's not good. Because, the more casual it is, the more difficult it is to infer the pattern. I understand. That's how the lines are designed. What's wrong with you? What the hell are you doing?

Are you going to get me? Or are you going to give up? If you're going to attack, just let the horses go. I also have itchy hands anyway. Want to try your hand. I'm a newbie, but I've never lost since I've been fighting the monk for so long.

Of course. In addition to that, there's one more thing I seem to have forgotten to tell you. Ever since I was six years old, a monk has come to teach me. He seems to be a very powerful monk, and he is said to be a member of a killer organization, but I don't know what kind of organization it is.

However, I know very well what his strength is, and he should have been a low-level killer at that time. For me, who was only six years old, it was very powerful. It's a pity that I was easily defeated by such a master when I was only seven years old. Later, my dad brought me an even more powerful killer.

I remember that the killer seemed to be a mid-level killer. Although I don't know what the level of strength is, I was still eight years old, which means that it only took me a year to defeat him. Later, many people have been beating the mid-level killers over and over again.

Although I never had the opportunity to contact high-level killers, this is not necessarily a bad opportunity. Don't you want to kill me? Let's see if these fists of mine are rusty. Wait a minute. What is your strength? I haven't figured it out yet.

I'm sorry, but if you're a high-level killer, please let me go, I'm welcome to kill me. If you have the ability, I won't regret anything, and I will even thank you. Because, you are equivalent to fulfilling my dream. You know why?

In the beginning, I thought I would never get a chance to fight against high-level killers again. And why should I fight against high-level killers? Actually, it's for you. Because, if it weren't for you, it would be weird. Another thing you have to figure out is that this kind of thing is not so easy to do.

I also want to be able to compete with other people. But this is obviously not easy. In other words, no one will want to help me. If you want to, that's great. It's just a pity that I can't find anyone like that. It's a pity. I even gave up on my dream of becoming a monk.

However, your team saved me, and I was thrilled when I saw your news. That's why I signed up. Do you think they came to you just for the money? No, no. If it was just money, I wouldn't be that excited. It could even be said that if it was just for the money, I could ignore you.

The reason why I ignored you and was willing to work under you was because I wanted to have this opportunity to compete with high-level killers. And if you're that kind of master, then please don't attack politely. I can't ask for it. But if you're not, you're just a mid-level killer, then I suggest you don't attack it.

The reason is very simple, I'm afraid that I will kill you too hard. There are many, many mid-level killers who have died in my hands. And not none. If you don't mind being that extra one, then you can attack too. Come on. ”1.