What is going on? How can the heart-kidney intersect be so violent?

I feel like I've been pitted by them again. Pen @ fun @ pavilion wWw. ｂｉｑUｇE。 infoAt the beginning, they hated iron but not steel, and the topic at that time was the intersection of hearts and kidneys.

If you care about your heart and kidneys, you can't help but mention the combination of water and fire, and you can't help but mention the coexistence of gas and liquid......

None of these statements are true, and none of them are true. It seems to be almost the same, but in fact it is a thousand miles away. It's not easy to distinguish carefully, but in the process of practice, it's easy to discern, even self-evident, and undiscerning. As a human being, the heart and kidney must intersect, otherwise it will definitely not be a living person. This kind of sympathy, or communication, is like the beating of the heart and the flow of blood, which is constantly going on and never stopping. Of course, it is not perceptible during the day, and the flow of qi and blood covers it up. But at night, especially during sleep, the heart-kidney interaction is often very large. Daytime damage and wear and tear are almost repaired by this process. This is done spontaneously, and the human body has always repaired and maintained itself. If someone thinks of heart-kidney intercourse as some kind of practice, then nine times out of ten they are a liar.

The heart belongs to fire, and there is true water in the fire, and the kidneys belong to water, and there is true fire in the water.

The heart belongs to yang, and there is true yin in yang, and the kidneys belong to yin, and there is true yang in yin.

This qi of mine moves spontaneously, and it seems to be too strong, and it is not only the qi of the viscera that is aroused. My mind sank, as if I was about to fall into a bottomless abyss, but at this moment I didn't feel panicked at all, as if there was another person in my body.

This self is neither the id, nor the superego, nor the ego, but the self perceived by external objects, the self shaped from within. If a person actually exists, but cannot be perceived by others, then he is no different from non-existence. If a person is exactly what others think they are, and if they are completely in line with what others think, then this person must not be a living person, but only a creature of other people's minds. The "I" that emerges now is a combination of the two. This "I" maintains the state of stillness and stillness;