Lev said as he created a new post.

He had long seen Huang Yifan unpleasant.

He's, why should he, a student who hasn't graduated from college, be a lecturer in psychology for them?

Why, his salary is still higher than his own.

Previously, Huang Yifan's dream psychology Lev disagreed, thinking that the explanation of dream psychology was too far-fetched. That's all, in any case, although dream psychology is indeed a bit far-fetched, after all, it is a newly developed theory, and there will indeed be a lot of imperfections in the early beginning. But what the hell is that unconscious resonance, what the hell is the zodiac? In Lev's eyes, Huang Yifan is almost the same as those "seminary" gods.

This is the University of California, this is the American institution of higher learning, and this is the cradle of the world's top academics. Here's no room for a guy who can only fool people to come and mislead people's children.

A nameless fire rose in his heart, and Lev wrote:

To put it simply, psychology is a science that studies human psychological phenomena, mental functions, and behaviors. He includes a large number of statistical data, objective fact analysis, and the discipline through various scientific research methods. This discipline is about our lives, about everything in our society. However, not everything that has to do with psychology can be called psychology.

Nutrition, for example, is a typical pseudoscience.

In the same way, within our psychology, there are many pseudo-psychology that look like psychology.

I thought it was pseudo-psychology that was hyped up in the media and newspapers before. Because, although he can explain some dream phenomena, he cannot explain all dream phenomena. If we were to call dream psychology psychology, we would only call it pseudo-psychology.

However, the dream psychology of a certain lecturer is quite good, although it is pseudo-psychology, but it can explain some special dreams. However, the unconscious resonance he proposed, the theory of the zodiac, is a thorough pseudo-psychology.

Below, we will debunk the two pseudo-psychological theories of a lecturer one by one.

Let's start with the theory of unconscious resonance.

It sounds like a good name, and people who don't know really think it's a theory of psychology. Even if you are a student of psychology, when you hear this name, you may subconsciously feel that this theory is very reasonable. But does psychology really have a theory of unconscious resonance?

No, no.

It is said that the "unconscious resonance theory" originated from a board game tarot made by a certain lecturer, although the lecturer has always claimed that his tarot cards can capture your "unconscious resonance", and use the tarot cards to analyze the situation you encounter now, and even predict the future...... But, ironically, the lecturer also said it. Tarot cards cannot be verified by a lot of repeated experiments, and once they are verified with a lot of repeated learning, then the theory of unconscious resonance will fail.

See, what kind of crooked theory is this?

What kind of pseudo-psychology, I think, this kind of theory is simply an insult to psychology.

Second, the theory of the zodiac.

I have to say that the brain hole of a certain lecturer is really too big, and his imagination is really amazing. When I was talking about psychology, I actually went to astronomy, and in order to show that my theory was high, I even moved out the ecliptic, calendar, and so on. At the same time, it is also pointed out that human character is affected by the movement of celestial bodies.

Perhaps, this theory is correct.

Indeed, celestial movements do have an impact on us humans.

However, in the end, one of the lecturers concluded that the time of birth will determine the personality of a person.

If that's the case, then isn't that saying that you are what you were born with, you are.

You were born rich, and you are rich.

You were born poor, and you are poor.

You were born stupid, and you will be stupid later.

God, I can't believe it, what is the difference between this and fatalism?

If we can even believe in fatalism, then what should we strive for, because God has long been predestined.

I'm sorry, but I'm so excited.

In fact, there are too many pseudo-sciences and pseudo-psychology in this society. There are some pseudo-science, pseudo-psychology made up by unscrupulous businessmen. There are also some scholars who seek fame and reputation, and come up with a set of theories that are true and not true. For these people, I didn't bother to expose them before, because after all, there are too many such people, and I have no obligation to expose them. But if such a person were to appear at our University of California, I think it would be too incompetent for me not to say anything. 】

In a frenzy, Lev posted a post on his own account.

"Haha, Lefey, I posted a post with my real name to see if I scolded him. ”

Lev asked himself if he was a bit well-known at the University of California, and he thought he wrote a good post. If the other students saw it, they would definitely join in scolding that guy with him.

"I saw that the scolding was good, that is, a certain lecturer was too subtle, why didn't he name him. ”

"Hehe, it's the same with or without a name, anyway, everyone knows. ”

"That's right, I'll help you top it. ”

As he spoke, Le Fay also logged in to his account and helped Lev top the sticker.

"Damn, Lev, you're going to be angry, more than a dozen people have just posted your post. ”

As soon as I put on a sticker, Le Fay refreshed it and found that many people have started to top it.

"That's, don't look at who sent it, what are they talking about?"

Lev asked, a little smugly.

"I'll see. ”

Le Fay just casually swept it, and didn't know what these people were talking about.

It's just that when he carefully looked at the content of the top post, Lefey almost sprayed water.

“fu.ck。 ”

"What did you say?"

Lev glared at Lefey.

"Well, I'm sorry, Lefey, I guess you'd better see for yourself. ”

After saying that, Lefey didn't say anything, pretending to be sorting out the papers.

Lev was a little depressed, and opened the post he had just turned off again.

Looking at this, Lev's whole person is not good.

"fu.ck, I'm your mother. ”

"What kind of dream psychology is pseudoscience, people's dream psychology is in a science magazine, are you embarrassed to say?"

"What kind of thing is Lev, running here and barking. ”

"If you have a heart, liver, spleen, lungs, and kidneys, how can you say that the theory of unconscious resonance is pseudo-psychology? Can't a lot of experiments prove that he is wrong? If so, as a lecturer in psychology, Mr. Lev, could you please prove where the "consciousness" that you have been studying in psychology is, and can you use experiments to prove that your consciousness and your character exist?"

"The theory of the zodiac clearly says that human character is influenced by innate and acquired, acquired is the environment, and innate is directly existent, where is there fatalism? Moreover, even if there is fatalism, there are some things that are destined to be unchangeable. It's like if you were born male and female, you were female. The family you were born into has no money, your looks, and a lot of your decisions are decided. Don't you think that's right?"

"Physics is passing by. I don't know if the dream psychology and unconscious resonance theory and the zodiac signs are pseudo-psychology as mentioned by Lecturer Huang Yifan. But, as opposed to physics, is psychology a science?

"The chemistry department also passed by, and I only knew that we had to show empirical evidence when we did experiments. May I ask Lev from psychology, do you have empirical evidence in psychology, and since you don't, hehe, what right do you have to question a certain lecturer's point of view? In fact, in my eyes, it doesn't matter whether the tarot "unconscious resonance theory" is science or not, or whether it is pseudo-psychology or not, what matters is whether this thing is useful or useless for us. It works, even if it's pseudoscience, pseudopsychology can also be used. It's useless, even if it's real science, real psychology, what are we going to do?"

"Anyway, I think tarot cards are quite fun, and sometimes they are really accurate. ”

"Flicker, flicker, flicker. I don't care if psychology is science or not, or if dream psychology is pseudo-psychology. Anyway, in my eyes, you psychology people are fooling. I'll see who of you can fool whom, come on. ”

"That's a good point, whoever fools the most is the real psychology. ”

"Looking forward to the full version of the zodiac theory, Lev, if you are interested, you can also listen to Lecturer Huang Yifan's class. ”

Exactly the opposite of what Lev thought. Not only did Lev not get the top posts from some other students, but on the contrary, the post he just posted was scolded by a group of students. (To be continued.) )