It is a very strange thing, which cannot be touched and seen, but it does exist. potential, it is difficult to form. Once you have formed your own "momentum", it is a breeze.

As the saying goes, it's hard to make money with hard work, it's easy to make money with money. When there is no 'potential', it takes a lot of effort to do things, and with the 'potential', it is invincible.

It is easy and difficult for a person to form his own momentum.

The ease lies in the fact that if you have a few dollars and a little human-machine relationship, you can say that you have 'potential'. It's just that this potential is a 'small potential' that is only limited to a small circle, and its effect is small, and it is easy to be dispersed by external forces.

The difficulty lies in the formation of a 'general trend', which has a large scope of influence and unstoppable power. On the contrary, there are very few people who can become a big trend.

It is also difficult for literati to form their own 'momentum'.

Don't think of writing as a lofty thing. Someone did an experiment to prove one thing, the author can be cultivated.

A university scholar randomly selected a group of people and trained them rigorously, and finally found that these people could write good articles.

To what extent have these people's articles been written, compared to the works of authors in the literary circle, they are at a medium level. In other words, the level of 'authors' who have come down from these assembly lines exceeds half of the authors in the literary circle.

Seeing this, I guess some people are going to say that I am blowing blindly. Countless bull people have said that writing depends on talent. One big man may make a mistake, how can so many big ones make a mistake. Writing depends on talent, how can it be mass-produced.

And, if the author can mass produce, why don't there be institutions that do it?

Here we have to talk about the shortcomings of mass-produced authors. They are produced in fixed molds, and they are also limited by molds. They lack spirituality compared to the 'natural' authors. And what is the most important thing about the work? It's spirituality.

Works without spirituality are just piles of words, lackluster.

And there are too many similarities between the products produced in one mold. A large number of similar 'products' hit the market, and in the end, everyone had nothing to eat.

So the final conclusion of this experiment is that writers can be cultivated, but writers cannot be cultivated.

Don't think about writing so simply, it's easy to get into this industry, but it's hard to mix well. Most authors also earn money for tea.

So most of the author group is part-time, and writing is just a hobby. Less than 10 percent of the real full-time authors. (Without counting the web author.) ）

To exaggerate, 90% of the authors are just 'craftsmen' who pile up words, and whether their works can be sold or not depends on luck. Therefore, in the literary circle, these people do not care whether they are 'potential' or not.

The remaining 10 percent belong to spiritual writers who are able to create works with souls. They are the backbone of the literary circle. These people use their works to build a 'momentum' for themselves.

There are very few spiritual writers who embody spirituality as ideas and use their thoughts to influence more people. This kind of person is a master. The master must have the 'general trend'.

It is indisputable that Zhu Ziqing has initially possessed the 'general trend', and what he lacks is only the fermentation of time to make his 'potential' stronger.

The potential is naturally centripetal and will roll bigger and bigger without the interference of external forces. When your 'momentum' is large to a certain extent, the benefits will come naturally.

It is for this reason that Yasuo Matsushita and others took the initiative to find Zhu Ziqing as the spiritual leader of the 'ugly school'. They want to use Zhu Ziqing's 'momentum', but their 'leverage' behavior will in turn increase his momentum.

The people who want to borrow Zhu Ziqing's 'potential' are not only Yasuo Matsushita and others, it can be said that there are very, very many. No, there is another group in Zhu Ziqing's ignorance, and it is still an organization from the United States imperialism.

Reasoning does not have a world-wide unified award, but this does not mean that there are no world-recognized authoritative awards. On the contrary, there are quite a few world-authoritative reasoning awards.

For example, the three major awards for reasoning in the island nation, the Sherlock Prize in the United Kingdom, the Deutsche Krimi Preis Award in Germany, and so on.

Let's put it this way, countries with a high level of reasoning generally have world-authoritative reasoning awards. On the contrary, reasoning desert countries are not qualified to talk about what is not a big prize.

But as far as Western countries are concerned, these reasoning awards are still graded and important, among which the most influential and authoritative ones are the US Imperial Edgar Award and the John Bull Dagger Award.

The Edgar Award, also known as the Master Award, is the most authoritative reasoning award of the United States. The judging process starts in early August each year.

There are thirteen awards in the Master Award, including the best, the best virgin, and the best crime record. Among them, the best award is the highest gold content.

The Grand Prize is limited to one award per person per work, and no more nominations are allowed. The judging process for each award is divided into four rounds.

The first round is popular voting. As long as the work came out between June last year and June this year, it can be recommended. The twenty books with the highest number of votes advanced to the second round.

The second round is the jury vote. Six of the twenty books will be selected to advance to the third round.

The third round is the voting of the annual members of the American Imperialist Science Fiction Association, and the top three enter the final battle.

In the fourth round, the jury decides who is the champion and runner-up.

There is no doubt that Zhu Ziqing's "Sherlock Holmes" passed the first round of selection with a high number of votes that exceeded the total number of votes of the top five.

As a result, the American imperialists on the other side of the ocean came with good news: "The Sherlock Holmes Detective Book from Chinese writer Mr. Zhu Ziqing passed the first round of the Master Award, and ranked first in the first round with the highest number of votes in the history of the Master Award." ”

The influence of Sherlock Holmes in the East is not particularly exaggerated, and the influence in the Western world covers all aspects.

For example, after reading "Sherlock Holmes", countless people began to observe everything around them using the methods described in the book, and put the results on the Internet.

Some people wander the streets when they have nothing to do, just to observe passers-by, and then judge their work and marital status based on their clothing and walking speed.

Some people look for thieves according to the deductive method in order to seek justice.

There are also people who want to be 'detectives' and use the methods to find lost items or something.

And the kids play the plot of the show, or you play Sherlock Holmes, he plays Peanut, and comes to a crime-solving operation.

In short, Sherlock Holmes has penetrated into the hearts of all Westerners. Become an indispensable part of their lives.

For "Sherlock Holmes" to pass the first round of selection, Westerners celebrate and think that it is a matter of course. In their words, God would be angry if even Sherlock Holmes could not win the prize.

The Los Angeles Daily reported that there is no need to discuss it anymore, and there is no need to discuss it, Sherlock Holmes must be the best of the Masters Award. Now let's speculate on who is in second place.