Since the upload of notes is a sudden idea, I will directly bring up the previous notes without tidying up. Pen, fun, pavilion www.biquge.info can guarantee that it is original, and disorganized, everyone forgive me, if there is everyone.

There may be repetitive content, which is probably more critical and is the cornerstone of my thinking. There may also be contradictions, which may be different ideas in different periods, and this can be noted. At the same time, there is also a nonsense part, that is because I am not good at learning, and I talk big about tiger skin, please forgive me. A lot of times I just have an idea, and out of the recklessness of young people, I throw it out in one go.

There are also instructions to make up for it slowly later.

There is a feeling that this guy throws the messy notes he made on the Internet, which will actually bring trouble with chapter naming, which cannot but be said to be a kind of self-inflicted. Now I'm just going crazy, so it's not uncommon for chapter names to be inconsistent with the content, so don't hit me.

It's all nonsense, fragmented thinking, mainly reading books in various fields, and then being inspired, and quickly writing it down, which can be seen as a flash of inspiration in the brain

Because my thinking is based on my unique life experience, how can I force others to resonate with something?

Here we can talk about the Taoist "Tao", the Tao is very simple, but we can only observe the result of being interpreted by a unique individual, which is very complicated

Simple ideas are more recognized? I don't think that's what I mean? I mean complex ideas are derived from simple principles. For example, a whole set of mathematical systems derived from simple addition, subtraction, multiplication and division, the latter is recognized by many people, but it is not simple at all.

Could it be that my thinking pattern is a bit one-sided, and the misunderstanding may be mistaken for a generation gap?

Yes, at this stage, I can only think in an abstract dimension. Otherwise, when it comes to real social experience, any person will dump me for nine streets

Social experience is just a matter of how much, how deep or shallow

We need to play to our strengths and avoid our weaknesses

If the social experience is insufficient, the amount of reading will make up for it

Of course, that's not the point

It's that I determine my path early on

Taking the path of research is relatively simple, simple, and suitable for my child-like character

The main thing is that I'm too selfish and only focus on myself

This is a serious character flaw for me

The mental age is still in the child's stage

Recognize your own selfishness, not extreme? No, this is a deeper level of selfishness

Like a chain of suspicion, I know you know you know you know...... The average person goes back and forth two or three times, and I can get tangled up many times

My dream is to be like a philosopher and spend my life exploring the truth of the universe

And then generally it's lonely and old.

In fact, it is also very good as a pursuit

Actually, I don't think it's necessarily a blessing to be a partner now

One can be very happy

I'm a different one

Actually, I feel that my biological instinct controls my will, and my current method is the opposite

Don't be completely instinctual, well, it makes sense

There are many people in the world who satisfy their instincts, and there are people who get rid of them

It's just that maybe the latter number is smaller, but it still exists

Don't dwell on worldly ideas

This is also a truth of the universe, there is no absolute truth, it is just a choice

Of course, the idea of the present may change in the future

If you can live a happy life, it's OK, and the way is not informal

It's all a choice

It is impossible for a man to cross the same river twice

The possibilities are endless

It can be good, it can be bad, it's all probability

Everyone wants to move in a good direction, but there is still a lot of uncertainty

From a higher-dimensional perspective, in fact, the unique encounters of individuals are a kind of inevitability, and they are all a kind of distribution of the network

That is, at the statistical level, we know that everything is predestined, but we can't be sure whether we are destined or not, so we have to look a little away

For example, winning the lottery. We know that there must be people at the level of the whole, but our daily lives only pay attention to the individual level, so we have to be detached

I want to make a difference

But it's also possible if there is a situation where I don't achieve anything

God rewards hard work, just like if you work hard, there is a 90% probability that there will be better results. This is a preliminary conclusion from observation, but on a large enough scale, many of our old proverbs are still somewhat correct. But it's all probability, and we can understand it this way: the general causal relationship is two endpoints in dynamic equilibrium, that is, they transform into each other, but the whole may reflect one direction, and we can observe the trend of the whole.

I'm just trying to interpret the rewards of heaven from the perspective of the Internet

My current understanding is that everything is probability, and that 1% of the whole may be 100% of the individual, such as the prevalence of a certain disease is very low, but for the patient it is 100%

In fact, philosophy is generally nihilistic in the end. There is a certain meaning to be alive, just look at the person, and hope to go to which level

There is no certain standard that can be universal, and this is also the choice. But generally speaking, many of the current moral standards are relatively universal, and it is because there are more people who use them that they are determined to be standards

I struggled until the end to realize that I didn't have to struggle, but life may not be complete without going through this stage

We're like this normal distribution, where the peaks are what we think of as standard, but in reality, the peaks can move left and right

That's what changed

But in general, changes in codified standards are slow

I'm thinking too much now, but I don't learn much, and if I don't think about it, I'm going to die

If an individual's opinion is based on a rational attitude, he is qualified to express his opinion at any time

The so-called qualifications may be comparisons of the same dimension. But reality is multidimensional, and a certain equilibrium can be drawn in the end

We are all selectively expressed from the original state to the present, and it is unfair to compare a single dimension

I mean that some kind of advantage of any person is gained through sacrifice,

Only by achieving the ultimate in a certain field can it be possible to selectively express better results in a specific environment in the future

We tend to see only 1 college student selling pork, and we see 99 people doing the rest

I think his thoughts may be: I go my way, what is the matter

Of course, this is a survivorship bias that is a common phenomenon. But we can't give legitimacy to reality just because it exists

;